User talk:Tprtm

May 2022

Your recent editing history at Balhae shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Esiymbro (talk) 23:44, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

ok. but transliteration you write down exists.

It is strange that you deleted Balhae's Korean title in the past, but it is okay it's not too surprising if you think you're Chinese but. Tprtm (talk) 00:16, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Lead sections

Please familiarise yourself with the purpose and goals of writing lead / introductory sections in articles. Here are the articles in English and 한국어. The main point I want to stress to you is that Wikipedia leads should not be super detailed, specifically, they should not have many supporting details in parentheses. If the person, place, or thing is not the primary topic of the article, you do not need to add the years it existed or its name(s) in other languages. I know this is a common practice on Korean wikis like Namuwiki (나무위키), but this is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia. All the best, Yue🌙 19:40, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

ok Tprtm (talk) 23:56, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Your recent editing history at Gojoseon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Qiushufang (talk) 19:29, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tprtm. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 16:56, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts disallows you using both an account and an IP address as to evade scrutiny. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Next time, remember to log in when editing. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 17:03, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Yes. sorry Tprtm (talk) 17:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

It's true that you edited while logged out, but it's too unfair to be blocked right away for that reason.

If you give me one chance, I will never make this mistake again.

(The reason I used multiple accounts is because I forgot my password.) Tprtm (talk) 17:40, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Your editing while logged out gives me the impression of intentionally, repeatedly, evading scrutiny. I doubt you forgot your password, remembered it, forgot it again, and so forth at convenient times when your edits are challenged. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 17:42, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

It's obviously my fault to edit while logged out. But I don't understand being blocked without warning. Tprtm (talk) 17:49, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

This user and their IP sock have been in a drawn out edit war at Ōei Invasion, where they have been reverted by at least five different users, that they are still continuing. At Gojoseon, they have been reverted by three different users, their sock IP made this edit [1] and then they made the same one again today: [2] and again [3]. Several users and their socks have edit warred over the same content on the page including Traineek and their socks. @DatGuy: Qiushufang (talk) 03:56, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

If you are talking about Kor Ph, this account is not me.Tprtm (talk) 04:05, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

See similarities between Tprtm and Traineek's socks MarcofuUSA and BNParibasguy: [4], [5], [6]. Qiushufang (talk) 06:54, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Administrators will know if the account is really me or not lol Tprtm (talk) 07:02, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022

Your recent editing history at Hanbok shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
The current version stays as the WP:ONUS is on you, not others. You need to gather consensus before making this change. John Yunshire (talk) 05:39, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

So far no one has responded to my talk page and no one has raised any objections.

You are the only one currently reverting my edits. would you like to discuss with me? You obviously told me to discuss with the other editors and come to an agreement, but no one answered me.

You said there is obviously a historical reason, so let's discuss that reason. Tprtm (talk) 05:55, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Then why don't you join the debate? No one is responding to my discussion page.

You said there is a historical reason, let's discuss why on the talk page.

Tprtm (talk) 05:45, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

Your recent editing history at Goguryeo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Qiushufang (talk) 01:02, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Reason for being blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Tprtm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

In addition to this current account, I have created other accounts in the past called Aqww and Q1A1Z.

As a result, I was banned from Wikipedia and I was unblocked because I appealed to the administrator and said I would never use or create another account again.

But suddenly I was blocked again for the same reason.

I haven't used the accounts Aqww and Q1A1Z since they were unblocked, and now I'm using only this account. Also, I have never created another account. Check the history of the previous two accounts.

I created another account and was blocked, but I appealed to the manager of Wikipedia that I would never use that account again, and after the block was lifted, I never used those accounts. After that, I was only active with this account.

And while I've had editorial wars in the past, I haven't had editorial wars with other editors lately.

furthermore, it is too unfair to block it indefinitely due to an editing war. I was blocked for using multiple accounts and was unblocked by telling them I would never use multiple accounts again. Since then, only this account is currently being used.

You can find out by checking the usage history of accounts you have used in the past.

Really, why should I be blocked? What the hell have I done wrong? For multiple accounts, the ban was already lifted through appeal, and I was currently using only this account, but I was blocked again for the same reason. I don't remember the IDs of the two accounts I created before, and they are currently unused and neglected accounts. I have never used that account again, nor have I ever created a new account again.

It seems that an editor with whom I frequently clash has reported me, and that editor has reported me many times for the same reason. However, as I have said repeatedly, I have already filed an objection with the Wikipedia administrator in the past, and even though it has already been resolved, I reported it again for a similar reason and was blocked again. Again, I haven't used the accounts Aqww and Q1A1Z since this Tprtm account was unblocked. Tprtm (talk) 17:24, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I was not aware about past discussion about your previous block, however the logs show your block was not lifted, it expired. You were warned at that time not to edit logged out yet you have continued to do so, and that logged-out editing is what led me to block you again. I am unblocking you now subject to a formal one-account restriction, which means that you may edit from this account and this account only, and may not edit logged out at all, anywhere on the English Wikipedia. If you do edit logged out again, for any reason including by accident, you will be blocked again. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 21:21, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Conditionally unblocked

Per the section above, you have been conditionally unblocked, subject to a single account restriction. You are required to edit while logged into this account, and only this account. You may not create nor use multiple accounts, and you may not edit while logged out. Any single violation of this restriction will result in your indefinite block being restored. This condition does not expire, but may be appealed by posting a request at the administrators' noticeboard. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 21:36, 8 February 2023 (UTC)