User talk:Superastig

Welcome to my space.

Drop me a message.

Userboxes you're free to use.

Additional guidelines in creating an article for any radio station.

List of Philippine radio markets per region.

Don't touch.

Home

Talk

Userboxes

Station Articles

Philippine Radio Directory

Trap

Welcome to my talk page. Take note of these rules before posting a comment.

• If you're here to throw hissy fits over any of my edits, get out. Ain't nobody got time for arguing with anyone.
• I have the right to end and delete any conversation which turn into arguments and are not worth continuing.
• If you're here to report disruptive edits from IP users and the pages involved, take them to the WP:AIV and WP:RFPP where they're better taken care of. I'm not an admin.
• I welcome good conversations, but I don't tolerate arguments. I don't wanna end up like a mastodon.
• Always sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/21 High Street Doha

Hi. There was no consensus to merge. The policy based responses were to delete. Please reconsider and revert your close. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:18, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

I'm afraid I cannot. Two editors voted to "merge" its content to the respective target because they believed that it's not notable enough to warrant a standalone article and therefore is a valid WP:ATD. Therefore, I don't see a reason for me to revert my closure. ASTIG️🎉 _{(HAPPY 2023)} 16:00, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Deletion review for 21 High Street Doha

An editor has asked for a deletion review of 21 High Street Doha. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:04, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Reconsidering the close for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badnaseeb (2nd nomination)

Hey, I think you made the wrong call in closing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badnaseeb (2nd nomination) given that keep !voters were never able to substantiate an actual case for how notability guidelines were met (as well as the prevalence of SPA IPs on the keep side). I'd ask you to reconsider your decision to NAC the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

I'm afraid I cannot. I know that the "keep" votes are weak, but they still have merit whatsoever. And I don't see enough consensus for it to be deleted or redirected either. Therefore, I don't see a reason for me to revert my closure. ASTIG️🎉 _{(HAPPY 2023)} 01:27, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Deletion review for Badnaseeb

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Badnaseeb. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 02:53, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Happy Fourteenth First Edit Day!

Thanks. ASTIG️🎉 _{(HAPPY 2023)} 13:06, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Hey, Superastig. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 20:25, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Belfield (4th nomination)

Hi, I've undone your close of this AfD. For the rationale, see the relist comment. The BLP1E argument came late in the discussion, but merits to be addressed. --Randykitty (talk) 15:27, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Superastig non-admin AfD closes. Thank you. To be clear, I have proposed to topic ban you from closing AfDs. Flatscan (talk) 05:22, 7 February 2023 (UTC)