User talk:Mureungdowon

August 2022

Hello, I'm Deepfriedokra. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:58, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at People Power Party (South Korea), you may be blocked from editing. Jeff6045 (talk) 12:36, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

WP:RFPP is not disupte resolution

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:52, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Hello, I'm Andrevan. I noticed that you recently removed content from People Power Party (South Korea) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Andre🚐 04:56, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. I'd like you to check out the history of the article. There has long been consensus among users that PPP is in a political position of "right-wing", but it is only Jeff6045 that PPP is "centre-right to right-wing".--Mureungdowon (talk) 05:03, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

People Power Party

Let's stop edit war. I know you have accused me of disruptive behavior at adminstration notice board. Let's wait wiki adminstrator's decision. If I get sanctioned by wiki admin I will give up my revision and find alternative way. Thank you. Jeff6045 (talk) 07:26, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

The editorial war isn't what I started, it's what you're doing. Do not change your long-held political position in the article. Mureungdowon (talk) 07:33, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as you did at People Power Party (South Korea). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 07:34, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Congressional Progressive Caucus

Hi. I have reverted an edit of yours on this article, and would like to remind you about WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the recommended next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss the dispute on the article talk page with other editors, but not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring, a disruptive activity which is not allowed. Discussion on the talk page is the only way we have of reaching consensus, which is central to resolving editing disputes in an amicable and collegial manner, which is why communicating your concerns to your fellow editors is essential. While the discussion is going on, the article generally should remain in the status quo ante until the consensus as to what to do is reached (see WP:STATUSQUO).

Please remember that as the person attempting to make a change to the article, the WP:ONUS is on you to justify the change, and to get a consensus if it is disputed. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:06, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

If so, "centre-left" is also a new description and should be removed. I have seen countless sources describing the CPC as socialism. It is not limited to the American conservative media. Mureungdowon (talk) 04:10, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

I understand that you, personally, believe that it should be removed, but Wikipedia works by consensus, and to make changes which are disputed by other editors you must have a consensus. Please go to the article talk page and make your arguments there. If enough other editors agree with you, you can make the change. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:11, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Let's open a Talk to that article now. Thanks. Mureungdowon (talk) 04:12, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Thqat's fine, simply leave the article in the state it was in BEFORE YOU STARTED EDITING IT, at this version. If you revert again, you *WILL* be reported for edit warring. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:14, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022

Hello, I'm LilianaUwU. I noticed that in this edit to New Right (Denmark), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 06:05, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

The intention was to increase readability by simplifying overlapping ideologies in infobox. From now on, I will try to reveal the edit summary when I do a large amount of editing. Mureungdowon (talk) 06:08, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Warning

• Storm598 (talk · contribs)
• Mureungdowon (talk · contribs)
• Common articles
• Storm598 at ANI

I was reminded at my talk that I closed the above ANI report early last January. Your current contributions show a strong interest in the labels used to describe political parties and an interest in Korean politics (example1, example2). Be aware that edit warring, even if done slowly, will not be tolerated. If you change how an article describes a party and are reverted, you need to justify your proposal on article talk and wait for consensus. Johnuniq (talk) 08:23, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Sidebars

Sidebars are navigation templates. A sidebar's function is to help readers navigate across articles listed inside it, not to serve as an aesthetic piece for articles which are related to, but which do not focus on elements of, its primary topic. Yue🌙 08:06, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 09:07, 24 November 2022 (UTC)