User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment: WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient notification template
Line 101: Line 101:
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; color:#606570" |'''Editor of the Week'''
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; color:#606570" |'''Editor of the Week'''
|-
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid lightgray" |Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]] in recognition of {{{briefreason}}}. Thank you for the great contributions! <span style="color:#a0a2a5">(courtesy of the [[WP:WER|<span style="color:#80c0ff">Wikipedia Editor Retention Project</span>]])</span>
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid lightgray" |Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]] in recognition of your great contributions! <span style="color:#a0a2a5">(courtesy of the [[WP:WER|<span style="color:#80c0ff">Wikipedia Editor Retention Project</span>]])</span>
|}
|}
[[User:{{{nominator}}}]] submitted the following nomination for [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]]:
[[User:Ixtal]] submitted the following nomination for [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]]:
:I nominate ScottishFinnishRadish to be this weeks Editor of the Week for their many, many responses to edit requests ([https://sigma.toolforge.org/summary.py?name=ScottishFinnishRadish&search=Edit+request&server=enwiki&max=500&ns=Talk It's over 9000!]) and their collaborative behavior with other editors. It's good to see someone handling this many ERs, especially in [[WP:ARBIPA|ARBIPA]] + [[WP:GS/CASTE|GS/CASTE]] areas. This award was seconded by [[User:Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI|W. Tell DCCXLVI]] and [[User:FormalDude]].
:{{{nominationtext}}}
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
<pre>{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}</pre>
<pre>{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}</pre>

Revision as of 13:44, 2 July 2022


Your GA nomination of Jesse Lawson

The article Jesse Lawson you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jesse Lawson for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krisgabwoosh -- Krisgabwoosh (talk) 18:42, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valimai Boxoffice Update

Hi dear ScottishFinnishRadish,

Valimai

1. It is confirmed that VALIMAI has collected more than ₹234 Crores. The collections should be specifically mentioned and updated. There are plenty of valuable sources to prove that. The statement from Jatinder Singh of Pinkvilla is simply incorrect and irrelevant.

2. Change Box office Update est. ₹234 crore[a]

Source :

https://m.timesofindia.com/entertainment/tamil/movies/box-office/valimai-lifetime-box-office-collection-this-ajith-starrer-film-mints-rs-234-crore-turns-the-9th-highest-grosser-film-in-tamil-nadu/amp_articleshow/90734046.cms — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glenn Maxwell Maxi (talkcontribs) 05:26, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy summer/winter

Sunshine!
Hello ScottishFinnishRadish! Interstellarity (talk) has given you a bit of sunshine to brighten your day! Sunshine promotes WikiLove and hopefully it has made your day better. Spread the sunshine by adding {{subst:User:Meaghan/Sunshine}} to someone else's talk page, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. In addition, you can spread the sunshine to anyone who visits your userpage and/or talk page by adding {{User:Meaghan/Sunshine icon}}. Happy editing! Interstellarity (talk) 22:14, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy first day of summer (or winter) wherever you live. Interstellarity (talk) 22:14, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you kindly. My garden, bees, and solar panels are living it up! ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:25, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of One Piece characters

Hi there. I know you're not an admin, but I was wondering if I could ask you for some advice, since you recently replied to a semi-protected edit request on Talk:List of One Piece characters. The IP range you responded to, 2601:40:3, created an account, Weeebatowj, but was indefinitely banned for vandalism shortly thereafter. Now, it seems like the same user/IP range is continuing to try to add their edits to the page. I reverted it, giving my rationale under their edit request on the talk page. Their sources are mostly unreliable, with Screen Rant being considered only a "marginally reliable" source at best. And even though this is approaching WP:OTHERSTUFF territory, even the One Piece fan wiki doesn't consider the addition official yet (sorry, I'm not sure how much you know about One Piece). As expected, they reverted my revert today, and I imagine this will continue to go on. Ultimately, is it the IP's responsibility to gather consensus for the addition, or will I have to let it slide eventually (to avoid getting banned for edit warring) and gather consensus for my side of the argument?

Also, this is ban evasion, right? I'm not sure if I can report them though...would that seem like I'd be doing it in bad faith, given the above situation? Wani (talk) 14:23, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's likely ban evasion. I suggest you request protection at WP:RFPP, and possibly reach out to Widr to see if a WP:DUCK block is in order, as they blocked Weeebatowj. Starting a talk page section about the addition, even if the other user is editing in bad faith, is a good idea too as it shows that you're trying to use good faith dispute resolution methods. If you're still having problems, I'd put together a short list of diffs showing the disrupting and the similarity between the IP and the blocked user, and make a short report at WP:ANI. If you need any other help, feel free to reach out. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:41, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wani, pinging, in case you're not watching this page. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:42, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Possible GA?

Based on your Lawson couple work, I thought you might enjoy working on John Mercer Langston, another individual active in African American activism around the same time. The article seems very short for the importance and stature of the man it is about and you have a good knack for finding information in newspapers of the era. — Ixtal ( T / C ) Join WP:FINANCE! 21:15, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Lawson was actually his lawyer, so they're even connected that way. I keep meaning to wikilink him in Langston's article. I think the next article in going to work up to GA is Frelinghuysen University, which needs a lot of love, and then I was going to create articles on the notable people tied to that. I may get to Langston at some point during that I don't have a lot of time, and I don't know when I'll get to writing more, but rest assured, it's in my radar. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:28, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Woah that's a cool coincidence. Good luck with the Frelinghuysen University work :) — Ixtal ( T / C ) Join WP:FINANCE! 21:52, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keith olbermann articles deletion

Why did you delete and erase the articles they were from new sources that are new guard certified? Is Newsweek too good 4 ya? JohnPaos (talk) 23:58, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please familiarize yourself with WP:RSP and stop edit warring and discuss on the talk page. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:04, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Collins Page

Hi, I am 2600:1017:B409:6009:6D3F:DF0A:677A:7182 (talk) 15:37, 26 June 2022 (UTC)Collins Historian. I saw your comment to build concensus to resolve the dispute. I have not been given feedback from Administrstors to address the removal of content. I continue to respond to all feedback but I am unable to get resolution. How should I respond to my only feedback which was “get off your soapbox” when I added historical events with citations including primary source citations and direct quotes? Earnestly willing to work with administrators. I am open to edits but believe the article is missing substantive content on Dobbs v. Jackson and the role of Susan Collins in this ruling surrounding her floor speech, and immediate criticism for her vote, and now her statements punlically that she was “misled.” The content can not exclude the fact of her floor speech, the decisive vote she justified within her floor speech, and the now historical events of the leaked draft and her vote against codifying Roe, and then the final decision of Dobbs v. Jackson. I respect the reverence of adding to a sitting senators profile but at the same time Wikipedia has an obligation to address the legacy of Susan Collins even updating the current events of what is already mentioned. It is widely argued that this is a pivotal moment in Susan Collins career and I think the bar is set pretty low in the article which already mentions her votes on the court in the edited section.[reply]

I have no opinion on the article content, I simply made a procedural close of the edit request, as there was an objection. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:50, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

britannica

Hello SFR. I couldn't find anything at rsn about the Britannica website. Could you point me to any discussions on this source? I've used it in the past, might lean to avoiding it if there's something i don't know about. Thanks. (Also, I'll cop to not paying attention on the Gallo age discrepancy that's out there. That's my bad. Apologies.)Nohomersryan (talk) 23:28, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's listed at WP:RSP, WP:BRITANNICA links to the specific entry. There also needs to be wide coverage. I actually had to check RSP, because I thought I had seen it somewhere. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:38, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Barca request

Thank you I provided two links to support the request, 108.21.235.188 (talk) 17:58, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should we just AFD it? His stupid calendar isn't notable and I don't think he really is otherwise, there's a lot of crufty PR pieces about him but nothing that's really in depth or independent imo. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:47, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I think it would probably be kept. This isn't a bad source, this is local, but has some depth, this is in-depth and independent. I think there's probably enough independent SIGCOV out there that he meets GNG. :( ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:53, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Praxidicae, based on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyond the Farthest Star (film), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heritage Falls (film), and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power Sword (2nd nomination) I'm pretty sure it'd be kept. He has far more coverage than any of those topics. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:20, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week

Editor of the Week
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Ixtal submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I nominate ScottishFinnishRadish to be this weeks Editor of the Week for their many, many responses to edit requests (It's over 9000!) and their collaborative behavior with other editors. It's good to see someone handling this many ERs, especially in ARBIPA + GS/CASTE areas. This award was seconded by W. Tell DCCXLVI and User:FormalDude.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}

Thanks again for your efforts! ―Buster7  13:38, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]