Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
7 June 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 03:13 +241 Viriditas talk contribs (→Use of "buttery" out of control: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 03:03 +283 Baseball Bugs talk contribs (→Use of "buttery" out of control)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 02:11 −1 Viriditas talk contribs (→Use of "buttery" out of control: ce)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 02:11 +350 Viriditas talk contribs (→Use of "buttery" out of control: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 02:05 +195 Baseball Bugs talk contribs (→Use of "buttery" out of control)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 01:37 +364 Viriditas talk contribs (→Use of "buttery" out of control: new section) Tag: New topic
6 June 2024
- diffhist User talk:DuncanHill 18:14 +592 ActivelyDisinterested talk contribs (→Transclusion hell: new section) Tag: New topic
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 15:32 +639 Sagittarian Milky Way talk contribs (→Why are English, Indonesian & Malay the closest natural languages to ISO Basic Latin alphabet?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 09:56 +53 Remsense talk contribs (→Why are English, Indonesian & Malay the closest natural languages to ISO Basic Latin alphabet?)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 09:55 +329 Remsense talk contribs (→Why are English, Indonesian & Malay the closest natural languages to ISO Basic Latin alphabet?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 09:38 +143 Wakuran talk contribs (→More-than-full rhyme)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 09:31 +132 Wrongfilter talk contribs (→More-than-full rhyme)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 09:21 +248 Lambiam talk contribs (→Why are English, Indonesian & Malay the closest natural languages to ISO Basic Latin alphabet?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 08:26 +5 Lambiam talk contribs (→More-than-full rhyme: line break)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 07:55 +882 Lambiam talk contribs (→More-than-full rhyme: rime riche) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 03:36 +578 Remsense talk contribs (→Why are English, Indonesian & Malay the closest natural languages to ISO Basic Latin alphabet?)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 03:33 +324 Remsense talk contribs (→Why are English, Indonesian & Malay the closest natural languages to ISO Basic Latin alphabet?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 01:55 +8 Sluzzelin talk contribs (→More-than-full rhyme: oops)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 01:41 +383 Sagittarian Milky Way talk contribs (→Why are English, Indonesian & Malay the closest natural languages to ISO Basic Latin alphabet?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 01:40 +1,238 Sluzzelin talk contribs (→June 6: rhyming q)
- diffhist Pepé Le Pew 01:00 −95 LD1998 talk contribs (Undid revision 1227488396 by Jonathystiensteinstone (talk)) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Pepé Le Pew 00:59 −69 LD1998 talk contribs
- diffhist Pepé Le Pew 00:58 +164 Jonathystiensteinstone talk contribs (The paragraph is fine and doesn't need to be overly long or detailed. That is what the critism section is for.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist Pepé Le Pew 00:33 −69 LD1998 talk contribs Tags: Manual revert Reverted
5 June 2024
- diffhist Pepé Le Pew 23:58 −95 Binksternet talk contribs (Reverted 1 edit by Jonathystiensteinstone (talk): Rv conjectdure) Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
- diffhist Pepé Le Pew 22:37 +95 Jonathystiensteinstone talk contribs (If it must be there it should be worded as such, giving more of an unbiased tone and being plain and simple regarding the situation and unknown nature of what will happen with the character. Hopefully this will be a nice compromise.) Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist Pepé Le Pew 20:40 +319 (Oinkers42) talk contribs (This, however, I feel like is a heavily discussed aspect of the character (some might even say the most discussed aspect of the character) and therefore should be mentioned in the lead.) Tags: Undo Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 20:30 +7 Marco polo talk contribs (→Why are English, Indonesian & Malay the closest natural languages to ISO Basic Latin alphabet?)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 20:28 +1 Marco polo talk contribs (→Why are English, Indonesian & Malay the closest natural languages to ISO Basic Latin alphabet?)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 20:27 +1,653 Marco polo talk contribs (→Why are English, Indonesian & Malay the closest natural languages to ISO Basic Latin alphabet?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Pepé Le Pew 17:42 −319 Jonathystiensteinstone talk contribs (This is my only account, I just made it last night. I did edit twice without an account prior to making the last change. In addition, it still stands that if you wish to add notable content revolving around the controversy around the character, you should do it in the proper section and be unbiased.) Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist Pepé Le Pew 17:38 +285 Notwally talk contribs (Reverted 1 edit by Jonathystiensteinstone (talk): You are using multiple accounts to remove longstanding notable content) Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
- diffhist Pepé Le Pew 17:37 −285 Jonathystiensteinstone talk contribs (Please stop making unnecessary additions to the page. There is already a section for critism for the character. In addition, the section edited comes across as biased in the wording. If you have anything you'd like to add with the character do it in the critism section and be objective on the topic. Thank you.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist Pepé Le Pew 17:06 −34 2601:8c0:37f:47fb:84eb:f475:143b:5d65 talk Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Pepé Le Pew 17:05 +319 Notwally talk contribs (Undid revision 1227338126 by 2600:1700:8650:A780:B47C:90B9:48CF:C38F (talk)) Tags: Undo Reverted
- diffhist Pepé Le Pew 17:01 +36 2601:8c0:37f:47fb:84eb:f475:143b:5d65 talk Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Pepé Le Pew 16:59 +10 2601:8c0:37f:47fb:84eb:f475:143b:5d65 talk Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Pepé Le Pew 16:58 +57 2601:8c0:37f:47fb:84eb:f475:143b:5d65 talk Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 10:42 +703 AnonMoos talk contribs (→June 5)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 10:16 +199 Wakuran talk contribs (→Paris, Peru.....Iraq, Iran....)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 09:51 +783 Lambiam talk contribs (→Why are English, Indonesian & Malay the closest natural languages to ISO Basic Latin alphabet?: The Chaos) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 07:50 +280 Lambiam talk contribs (→How many solutions of perfect pangram exist?: User:Lambiam/Pangram)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 07:10 +165 Remsense talk contribs (→Why are English, Indonesian & Malay the closest natural languages to ISO Basic Latin alphabet?)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 07:08 +552 Remsense talk contribs (→Why are English, Indonesian & Malay the closest natural languages to ISO Basic Latin alphabet?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language 07:02 +176 Lambiam talk contribs (→Why are English, Indonesian & Malay the closest natural languages to ISO Basic Latin alphabet?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Pepé Le Pew 03:49 −319 2600:1700:8650:a780:b47c:90b9:48cf:c38f talk (If Leads should include important aspects of the subject, then why not include more summaries of the other aspects? Keep it organized and just leave it to the "Controversy" section to discuss that aspect.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist Pepé Le Pew 01:47 +319 Notwally talk contribs (Reverted 1 edit by 2600:1700:8650:A780:B47C:90B9:48CF:C38F (talk): That's not how lead sections work) Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
- diffhist Pepé Le Pew 01:20 −319 2600:1700:8650:a780:b47c:90b9:48cf:c38f talk (There is already a section for the controversy regarding the character. It is unneeded to add it twice.) Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist Pepé Le Pew 00:56 +320 Notwally talk contribs (Undid revision 1227308621 by 68.129.24.229 (talk) the point of lead sections is to summarize important content) Tag: Undo
4 June 2024
- diffhist Pepé Le Pew 23:47 −320 68.129.24.229 talk (Irrelevant to add that as there is already a section on the controversy.) Tag: Reverted