Related changes
Appearance
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
18 June 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions 16:45 −21 AirshipJungleman29 talk contribs (→Step 4a: What to do during a review if it seems abandoned{{anchor|N4a|What to do if a review seems abandoned}}: trim header)
- diffhist User talk:Chiswick Chap 08:07 −3,209 Chiswick Chap talk contribs (archiving)
17 June 2024
- diffhist User talk:Chiswick Chap 11:04 +119 Chiswick Chap talk contribs (→OTD: thanks!)
- diffhist m User talk:Chiswick Chap 09:07 +6 Gerda Arendt talk contribs (→OTD: connect to pic)
- diffhist User talk:Chiswick Chap 09:06 +507 Gerda Arendt talk contribs (→OTD: new section) Tag: New topic
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 06:24 +9 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (Undid revision 1229507875 by Dominic Mayers (talk) I undo myself, because the word "scientific" was there in 2003 and there is a notion of reliability there.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 05:42 −9 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: Of course, he was talking about the sources, not the editors. That is so obvious from the context, but fine, we can add "sources". It is obviously exactly what he meant. But, reliability is associated with ways to reject sources that were not considered at the time. If the argument is only a possible confusion with editors, then reliability is not at all needed.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 04:39 −18 Levivich talk contribs (→Neutral point of view: why three shortcuts when one is all that's 'due' ha ha)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 03:36 +20 Mathglot talk contribs (Undid revision 1226459334 by Dominic Mayers. In Wales's 2003 post on the WikiEN-l mailing list, it is clear that he was talking about reliable sources and not about Wikipedia editors. The example concerns a physics question, and is about what "mainstream physics texts" and the "majority of prominent physicists" (i.e. RSes) say about the question, and a view "held by an extremely small minority"... "doesn't belong in Wikipedia".) Tag: Undo
16 June 2024
- diffhist User talk:Chiswick Chap 19:10 −725 Chiswick Chap talk contribs (rm intermediate notices)
- diffhist User talk:Chiswick Chap 01:47 −726 Chiswick Chap talk contribs (rm dup) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
15 June 2024
- diffhist User talk:Chiswick Chap 22:06 +726 LittleJerry talk contribs (Undid revision 1229276807 by LittleJerry (talk))
- diffhist User talk:Chiswick Chap 22:06 −1,043 LittleJerry talk contribs Tag: Manual revert
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions 20:27 −7 Prhartcom talk contribs (Rmv. bold, c/e: can -> may)
14 June 2024
- diffhist User talk:Chiswick Chap 22:38 +318 LittleJerry talk contribs (Undid revision 1228744095 by LittleJerry (talk)) Tags: Undo Reverted
13 June 2024
12 June 2024
- diffhist User talk:Chiswick Chap 23:09 −318 LittleJerry talk contribs (Undid revision 1228743446 by LittleJerry (talk)) Tags: Undo Reverted
- diffhist User talk:Chiswick Chap 23:03 +318 LittleJerry talk contribs (→Cladogram request: new section) Tags: Reverted New topic
- diffhist User talk:Chiswick Chap 07:47 −3,354 Chiswick Chap talk contribs (archiving) Tag: Manual revert