Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
6 June 2024
- diffhist User talk:Asilvering 19:24 +213 UnsungHistory talk contribs (→Question from UnsungHistory (19:24, 6 June 2024): new section) Tag: Mentorship module question
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 16:30 −6 Butwhatdoiknow talk contribs (→Responsibility for providing citations: copy edit re "all" | add missing "whose")
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 12:58 +168 Remsense talk contribs (Undid revision 1227554432 by Peter Gulutzan (talk): lucky for you it is not: i can tell because i read it) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 12:55 −174 Peter Gulutzan talk contribs (Undid Revision as of 00:13, 6 June 2024 by WhatamIdoing. I don't know what the edit summary "make the two lists match" means, I do know that this looks like a substantial change of the policy.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 12:32 +6 ActivelyDisinterested talk contribs (Missing word) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 05:21 −9 Remsense talk contribs (→Terms with common usage in English)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 00:13 +168 WhatamIdoing talk contribs (Make the two lists match) Tags: Reverted Visual edit
4 June 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout 05:28 +73 PamD talk contribs (Reverted good faith edits by Herostratus (talk): Cords are in this place in thousands of articles, though "display=title" means that they are seen at the top of the article) Tags: Twinkle Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout 04:55 −73 Herostratus talk contribs (→Order of article elements: I have literally never seen coordinates placed anywhere but the top of the article (which of course, as it is more functional to do so rather than burying it in the end matter), and rules are supposed to describe common practice) Tag: Reverted
3 June 2024
- diffhist User talk:Asilvering 08:16 +245 Aeon Trasazz talk contribs (→Question from Aeon Trasazz (08:16, 3 June 2024): new section) Tag: Mentorship module question
- diffhist User talk:Asilvering 03:41 +350 MarkWHowe talk contribs (→Question from MarkWHowe (14:53, 12 May 2024): Reply) Tag: Reply
2 June 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 16:24 +10 GSK talk contribs (→Verb tense: new shortcut)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 05:00 −1 Remsense talk contribs (→Scrolling lists and collapsible content)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 04:59 +138 Remsense talk contribs (→Scrolling lists and collapsible content: ce!)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 04:57 +2 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: dummy edit and apologies. What I’ve said is probably incorrect and it seems that a previous substantial edit is also a direct quote from Jimbo Wales (and not in the editor’s own words as I said). Thanks.)
1 June 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 23:00 +115 Remsense talk contribs (→Foreign terms: boldly switching term from "foreign" to "non-English" per talk page discussions where it seemed there were no real objections)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 22:22 +7 Remsense talk contribs (→Foreign terms: +shortcut)
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Verifiability 17:59 +13 Primium talk contribs (→Responsibility for providing citations: added ore-existing shortcut)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 16:29 +16 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: better?)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 16:09 −16 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (Self-revert. I didn’t notice there’s a discussion on talk until someone pinged me just now (this page wasn’t on my watchlist). I want to say that the green emphasis was added because in another discussion a user has misinterpreted the policy by citing what Jimbo said. It’s a long story but I don’t think I’m able to explain it clearly. Anyway I don’t want anymore drama so I’m self-reverting. Thanks everyone for watching...) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:No original research 08:50 −1 Remsense talk contribs (→See also)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 07:31 +16 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: Color. Wikipedia:Nobody reads the directions) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 07:24 −354 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (It seems to me that substantial change was made to the policy by another editor using their own words. I’m not sure it’s what Jimbo Wales’ original statement means. I’m restoring the page to the last stable version (revision 1224068956). Please read this too. Thanks.) Tag: Manual revert
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch 03:10 −16 Kire1975 talk contribs (Undid revision 1226664026 by Kire1975 (talk) UNDO OWN EDIT) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch 03:10 +16 Kire1975 talk contribs (→Relative time references: Wikipedia:As of) Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist User talk:Asilvering 02:19 +210 Kumar9098 talk contribs (→Question from Kumar9098 (02:19, 1 June 2024): new section) Tag: Mentorship module question
31 May 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 22:25 −6 SchreiberBike talk contribs (Small fix)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 12:14 +78 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: This part of Jimmy Wales original statement is fundamental to make clear the link with the fundamental notion of NPOV. In contrast, "reliable sources" can even be used to mean the opposite of NPOV as when people use "reliable" to mean "has a non biased point of view" and this incorrect use of "reliable" happens very often.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 12:00 −13 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: The "scientific" is misleading when we do not have the historical context, which was a scientific OR. The general principle is not about scientific knowledge only. This historical context was added as footnote, but this is not sufficient.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 11:54 −22 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (The notion of reliable sources was not discussed at the time. It's an important point, but not the key point.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout 09:40 −5 GhostInTheMachine talk contribs (→Section templates and summary style: use "links" to avoid confusion with actual references)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 09:22 +19 Remsense talk contribs (→Technical language)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 09:21 +12 Remsense talk contribs (→Technical language)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 09:19 −3 Remsense talk contribs (→Technical language: ce)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 09:12 +449 Remsense talk contribs (→Technical language: ce turned rewrite!)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 07:00 +2 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: better) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 06:59 +20 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: restore important clarification (revision 1226458510).) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Manual of Style 06:52 −2 Remsense talk contribs (→Technical language: (s)?)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 06:51 +13 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: add per Jimbo Wales 2003 statement.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 06:50 −2 Remsense talk contribs (→Animals, plants, and other organisms: unnecessary bracketing)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 06:49 +276 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: add context for Jimbo Wales 2003 statement.) Tag: Reverted