Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
7 June 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Be bold 08:43 −41 SilverLocust talk contribs (Undid revision 1227631109 by VitAlv13 (talk) (undoing the visual gag of making the display title bold. The quota for fun is already met by showing a comic.)) Tag: Undo
6 June 2024
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Be bold 22:18 +41 VitAlv13 talk contribs Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 16:30 −6 Butwhatdoiknow talk contribs (→Responsibility for providing citations: copy edit re "all" | add missing "whose")
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 12:58 +168 Remsense talk contribs (Undid revision 1227554432 by Peter Gulutzan (talk): lucky for you it is not: i can tell because i read it) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 12:55 −174 Peter Gulutzan talk contribs (Undid Revision as of 00:13, 6 June 2024 by WhatamIdoing. I don't know what the edit summary "make the two lists match" means, I do know that this looks like a substantial change of the policy.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 12:32 +6 ActivelyDisinterested talk contribs (Missing word) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 00:13 +168 WhatamIdoing talk contribs (Make the two lists match) Tags: Reverted Visual edit
5 June 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Civility 14:10 +28,160 Slatersteven talk contribs (Undid revision 1227400104 by 50.219.108.55 (talk)) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Civility 14:06 −28,160 50.219.108.55 talk (←Replaced content with ' (-_-) .... hi') Tags: Replaced Reverted
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Good articles/Natural sciences 03:36 +16 Esculenta talk contribs (→Arthropods: add missing italics)
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Good articles/Natural sciences 03:32 +4 Esculenta talk contribs (→Reptiles and amphibians: add missing italics)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Good articles/Natural sciences 03:30 +24 Esculenta talk contribs (→Birds: + Laysan honeycreeper)
4 June 2024
- diffhist m Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 18:12 −4 TheLocalTemp talk contribs (Fix hyperlink ('toaster' is a common word that most readers understand))
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spaceflight 10:57 +389 Randy Kryn talk contribs (new section, Euclid (italics? name change?))
2 June 2024
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Good articles/Natural sciences 21:29 0 CosXZ talk contribs (avoid redirect)
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Good articles/Natural sciences 21:23 −6 CosXZ talk contribs (avoid redirect)
- diffhist Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not 18:44 +28 The Sharpest Lives talk contribs (other redirect) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 04:57 +2 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: dummy edit and apologies. What I’ve said is probably incorrect and it seems that a previous substantial edit is also a direct quote from Jimbo Wales (and not in the editor’s own words as I said). Thanks.)
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Content assessment 02:39 +2 WhyIsNameSoHardOmg- - talk contribs Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
1 June 2024
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Verifiability 17:59 +13 Primium talk contribs (→Responsibility for providing citations: added ore-existing shortcut)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 16:29 +16 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: better?)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 16:09 −16 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (Self-revert. I didn’t notice there’s a discussion on talk until someone pinged me just now (this page wasn’t on my watchlist). I want to say that the green emphasis was added because in another discussion a user has misinterpreted the policy by citing what Jimbo said. It’s a long story but I don’t think I’m able to explain it clearly. Anyway I don’t want anymore drama so I’m self-reverting. Thanks everyone for watching...) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Assume good faith 15:55 −79 Butwhatdoiknow talk contribs (→top: Actually, it doesn't need to be said at all. WP:KUDZU)
- diffhist Wikipedia:No original research 08:50 −1 Remsense talk contribs (→See also)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 07:31 +16 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: Color. Wikipedia:Nobody reads the directions) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 07:24 −354 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (It seems to me that substantial change was made to the policy by another editor using their own words. I’m not sure it’s what Jimbo Wales’ original statement means. I’m restoring the page to the last stable version (revision 1224068956). Please read this too. Thanks.) Tag: Manual revert
- diffhist Wikipedia:Assume good faith 01:12 −3 Closed Limelike Curves talk contribs (Brevity) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
31 May 2024
- diffhist m Spaceflight 20:34 0 Chris the speller talk contribs (→Alternatives: replaced: rocket assisted → rocket-assisted) Tag: AWB
- diffhist Wikipedia:Good articles/Natural sciences 18:19 +37 LunaEatsTuna talk contribs (→Pharmacology)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 12:14 +78 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: This part of Jimmy Wales original statement is fundamental to make clear the link with the fundamental notion of NPOV. In contrast, "reliable sources" can even be used to mean the opposite of NPOV as when people use "reliable" to mean "has a non biased point of view" and this incorrect use of "reliable" happens very often.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 12:00 −13 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: The "scientific" is misleading when we do not have the historical context, which was a scientific OR. The general principle is not about scientific knowledge only. This historical context was added as footnote, but this is not sufficient.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 11:54 −22 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (The notion of reliable sources was not discussed at the time. It's an important point, but not the key point.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted