Related changes
Appearance
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
19 June 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 17:17 +4 ActivelyDisinterested talk contribs (To match how it was before the resent changes)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 14:21 −20 Peter Gulutzan talk contribs (Partially undid Revision as of 16:29, 1 June 2024 by Dustfreeworld. Not brown. See talk page comments dated today.)
- diffhist m Module:Banner shell 08:25 −57 MSGJ talk contribs (update location of level 3 articles)
18 June 2024
- diffhist Human rights in the United States 22:27 +919 Viriditas talk contribs (Restored revision 1227826109 by LucasBrown (talk): Not propaganda) Tags: Twinkle Undo
- diffhist Human rights in the United States 22:26 −919 59.23.157.132 talk (Removed pro-Chinese propaganda) Tags: Reverted references removed
- diffhist Terrorism in India 19:26 +65 LucasBrown talk contribs Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Human rights 08:00 +1,496 Thenightaway talk contribs (the historical context seems pertinent enough to belong here) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Human rights 07:32 −225 Casey56 talk contribs (Incorporated 3rd paragraph of lede into introductory paragraphs of History section)
17 June 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 06:24 +9 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (Undid revision 1229507875 by Dominic Mayers (talk) I undo myself, because the word "scientific" was there in 2003 and there is a notion of reliability there.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 05:42 −9 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: Of course, he was talking about the sources, not the editors. That is so obvious from the context, but fine, we can add "sources". It is obviously exactly what he meant. But, reliability is associated with ways to reject sources that were not considered at the time. If the argument is only a possible confusion with editors, then reliability is not at all needed.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 04:39 −18 Levivich talk contribs (→Neutral point of view: why three shortcuts when one is all that's 'due' ha ha)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 03:36 +20 Mathglot talk contribs (Undid revision 1226459334 by Dominic Mayers. In Wales's 2003 post on the WikiEN-l mailing list, it is clear that he was talking about reliable sources and not about Wikipedia editors. The example concerns a physics question, and is about what "mainstream physics texts" and the "majority of prominent physicists" (i.e. RSes) say about the question, and a view "held by an extremely small minority"... "doesn't belong in Wikipedia".) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Human rights 02:41 +552 SafariScribe talk contribs (Notifying of requested move using Move+)
15 June 2024
- diffhist m Wikipedia:WikiProject 10:26 0 Wikipedialuva talk contribs (→Inactive projects: clean up, typo(s) fixed: newly- → newly) Tag: AWB
- diffhist m Sri Lanka 02:31 +140 ThaiWood talk contribs (Filled in 3 bare reference(s) with reFill 2)
14 June 2024
- diffhist Module:Message box/tmbox.css 05:27 0 Izno talk contribs (just as obnoxious as the original brown)
- diffhist Module:Message box/tmbox.css 05:24 +537 Izno talk contribs (tmbox dark color)
- diffhist Module:Message box/tmbox.css 00:42 +87 Jon (WMF) talk contribs (Fixes phab:T367463)