Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
1 June 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 18:00 +424 Toadspike talk contribs (→Question 1: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Verifiability 17:59 +13 Primium talk contribs (→Responsibility for providing citations: added ore-existing shortcut)
- diffhist Template:Did you know 17:50 +18 Schwede66 talk contribs (→Hooks: as per Errors, but also change tense)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 16:29 +16 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: better?)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 16:25 +391 AirshipJungleman29 talk contribs (→Travis Glover: reply)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 16:09 −16 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (Self-revert. I didn’t notice there’s a discussion on talk until someone pinged me just now (this page wasn’t on my watchlist). I want to say that the green emphasis was added because in another discussion a user has misinterpreted the policy by citing what Jimbo said. It’s a long story but I don’t think I’m able to explain it clearly. Anyway I don’t want anymore drama so I’m self-reverting. Thanks everyone for watching...) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 16:07 +439 Lightburst talk contribs (→Travis Glover: sports)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Assume good faith 15:55 −79 Butwhatdoiknow talk contribs (→top: Actually, it doesn't need to be said at all. WP:KUDZU)
- diffhist User talk:Theleekycauldron 15:48 +155 Drmies talk contribs (→I wonder how the two day discussion period would hold up)
- diffhist User talk:Theleekycauldron 13:44 +257 Buster7 talk contribs (→I wonder how the two day discussion period would hold up: Two-Buster support)
- diffhist User talk:Theleekycauldron 13:06 +114 BusterD talk contribs (→I wonder how the two day discussion period would hold up: Elli looking quite good as of this datestamp; no challenges of any kind; discussion section is chatty and cordial)
- diffhist Wikipedia:No original research 08:50 −1 Remsense talk contribs (→See also)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 07:31 +16 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: Color. Wikipedia:Nobody reads the directions) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 07:24 −354 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (It seems to me that substantial change was made to the policy by another editor using their own words. I’m not sure it’s what Jimbo Wales’ original statement means. I’m restoring the page to the last stable version (revision 1224068956). Please read this too. Thanks.) Tag: Manual revert
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 05:44 +280 Nineteen Ninety-Four guy talk contribs (→69?: my 2c)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 05:41 +162 Bruxton talk contribs (→Need help with a nomination after an article title change: Brian Kesselring)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 05:26 +197 Bruxton talk contribs (→Need help with a nomination after an article title change: weak sauce)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 05:10 +124 Josethewikier talk contribs (→69?: Reply) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
- diffhist English language 02:30 0 Lyndon George talk contribs (The Republic of Ireland 🇮🇪 has a larger population and percentage of English-speakers than New Zealand 🇳🇿 .) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- diffhist English language 01:57 −1 David Thirpe talk contribs (#article-section-source-editor) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
- diffhist English language 01:57 −35 David Thirpe talk contribs (Fixed typo #article-section-source-editor) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
- diffhist m User talk:Theleekycauldron 01:51 −1 BusterD talk contribs (→I wonder how the two day discussion period would hold up: ce)
- diffhist User talk:Theleekycauldron 01:50 +484 BusterD talk contribs (→I wonder how the two day discussion period would hold up: non-sequitur)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 01:16 −2 RoySmith talk contribs (→Travis Glover: fix)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 01:16 +358 RoySmith talk contribs (→Travis Glover: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Assume good faith 01:12 −3 Closed Limelike Curves talk contribs (Brevity) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist User talk:Theleekycauldron 01:04 +722 BusterD talk contribs (→I wonder how the two day discussion period would hold up: let's not all jump at once!)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 00:59 +834 Narutolovehinata5 talk contribs (→Travis Glover: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 00:53 +409 Launchballer talk contribs (→69?: +comment)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 00:51 +198 Muboshgu talk contribs (→69?: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 00:41 +273 Lightburst talk contribs (→69?: run)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 00:16 +265 Lepricavark talk contribs (→Question 1: yes)
31 May 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 23:56 +133 BlueMoonset talk contribs (→Older nominations needing DYK reviewers: struck two; added two)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 23:08 +210 Hog Farm talk contribs (David, given that 69 (number) is one of today's DYKs, this doesn't seem so off-topic as to instantly remove) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 22:30 −210 David Eppstein talk contribs (Undid revision 1226628201 by Josethewikier (talk) if this has any relevance to DYK, it is not made clear) Tags: Undo Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 21:30 +210 Josethewikier talk contribs (→69?: new section) Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit New topic
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 20:15 +690 BeanieFan11 talk contribs (→Travis Glover: cmt)
- diffhist User talk:Theleekycauldron 19:39 +246 Theleekycauldron talk contribs (→I wonder how the two day discussion period would hold up: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist User talk:Theleekycauldron 19:33 +241 BusterD talk contribs (→I wonder how the two day discussion period would hold up: let's wait for now but I'm willing)
- diffhist User talk:Theleekycauldron 18:27 +813 Theleekycauldron talk contribs (→I wonder how the two day discussion period would hold up: Reply) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 17:46 +1,494 Gonzo fan2007 talk contribs (→Travis Glover: re)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 17:28 +404 Gonzo fan2007 talk contribs (→Travis Glover: re)
- diffhist User talk:Theleekycauldron 16:50 +472 BusterD talk contribs (→I wonder how the two day discussion period would hold up: new section) Tag: New topic
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography 16:37 +425 BINK Robin talk contribs (→Eric Hippeau edit request: new section) Tag: New topic
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 16:32 +111 Zanahary talk contribs (→Travis Glover: Reply) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 15:20 +281 Dilettante talk contribs (→Question 1: Reply) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:Did you know 15:19 +1,489 Gonzo fan2007 talk contribs (→Travis Glover: re)
- diffhist m Wikipedia talk:Did you know 13:50 +28 Nineteen Ninety-Four guy talk contribs (→Older nominations needing DYK reviewers: X approved)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 12:14 +78 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: This part of Jimmy Wales original statement is fundamental to make clear the link with the fundamental notion of NPOV. In contrast, "reliable sources" can even be used to mean the opposite of NPOV as when people use "reliable" to mean "has a non biased point of view" and this incorrect use of "reliable" happens very often.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 12:00 −13 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: The "scientific" is misleading when we do not have the historical context, which was a scientific OR. The general principle is not about scientific knowledge only. This historical context was added as footnote, but this is not sufficient.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted