Related changes
Appearance
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
17 June 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 22:15 +31 NebY talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation: +) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 22:06 +2,054 NebY talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 06:24 +9 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (Undid revision 1229507875 by Dominic Mayers (talk) I undo myself, because the word "scientific" was there in 2003 and there is a notion of reliability there.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 05:42 −9 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: Of course, he was talking about the sources, not the editors. That is so obvious from the context, but fine, we can add "sources". It is obviously exactly what he meant. But, reliability is associated with ways to reject sources that were not considered at the time. If the argument is only a possible confusion with editors, then reliability is not at all needed.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 04:41 −17 Levivich talk contribs (don't need three shortcuts)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 04:39 −18 Levivich talk contribs (→Neutral point of view: why three shortcuts when one is all that's 'due' ha ha)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 03:36 +20 Mathglot talk contribs (Undid revision 1226459334 by Dominic Mayers. In Wales's 2003 post on the WikiEN-l mailing list, it is clear that he was talking about reliable sources and not about Wikipedia editors. The example concerns a physics question, and is about what "mainstream physics texts" and the "majority of prominent physicists" (i.e. RSes) say about the question, and a view "held by an extremely small minority"... "doesn't belong in Wikipedia".) Tag: Undo
- diffhist m Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 03:19 +62 Ifly6 talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation: unindent) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography 02:20 +566 SafariScribe talk contribs (Notifying of requested move using rmCloser)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 00:12 +1,505 Ifly6 talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation: Reply) Tag: Reply
16 June 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 22:24 +2,252 Cynwolfe talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation: I get that feeling, but I don't think that's the takeaway) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 18:50 +1 NebY talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation: typo) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 18:49 +800 NebY talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation: an example) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 18:47 +1,645 Cynwolfe talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation: Could you point us to workable models of such tutelage?) Tag: Reply
- diffhist m Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 15:54 −52 Ifly6 talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist m Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 15:46 +48 Ifly6 talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist m Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 15:41 +8 Ifly6 talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation: missing words) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 15:14 +1,062 Ifly6 talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 14:36 +1,005 Cynwolfe talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation: Again, what is the achievable goal, and what action toward achieving it can the G&R project collectively launch?) Tag: Reply
- diffhist m Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 05:11 +3 Ifly6 talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation: no intent to imply PA is breaking stuff) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 05:04 +3,294 Ifly6 talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 04:09 +2,727 P Aculeius talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 01:44 +2,080 Ifly6 talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation: Reply) Tag: Reply
15 June 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 21:09 +2,873 P Aculeius talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 20:42 +224 Ifly6 talk contribs (→What to do about obsolete or original research articles: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 20:39 +2,043 Ifly6 talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography 15:31 +953 Peaceray talk contribs (→Where in the article to put citations for archival material by the subject: new section) Tag: New topic
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 14:14 +1,320 Cynwolfe talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation: this all seems sensible) Tag: Reply
- diffhist m Wikipedia:WikiProject 10:26 0 Wikipedialuva talk contribs (→Inactive projects: clean up, typo(s) fixed: newly- → newly) Tag: AWB
14 June 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 18:21 +290 Ifly6 talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 17:56 +173 Ifly6 talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography 11:19 +625 Spinixster talk contribs (→Good article reassessment for Ivory (wrestler): new section) Tag: New topic
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 09:04 +632 Caeciliusinhorto-public talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Module:Message box/tmbox.css 05:27 0 Izno talk contribs (just as obnoxious as the original brown)
- diffhist Module:Message box/tmbox.css 05:24 +537 Izno talk contribs (tmbox dark color)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 01:33 +2,128 P Aculeius talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Module:Message box/tmbox.css 00:42 +87 Jon (WMF) talk contribs (Fixes phab:T367463)
13 June 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 23:41 +120 Ifly6 talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 23:38 +297 Ifly6 talk contribs (→What to do about obsolete or original research articles: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 23:36 +429 Ifly6 talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 18:01 +442 Cynwolfe talk contribs (→On sources which are superceeded or require expert interpretation: not sure what the issue is, since existing OR and RS policies cover all this; all we can do is fix the articles by doing the work) Tag: Reply
- Protection log 15:57 Bearcat talk contribs protected Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of [Create=Require extended confirmed access] (indefinite) (there have now been at least two instances of vandals somehow getting to this page and "creating" a category that was really a misplaced article) Tag: Twinkle
- diffhist Module:Class/definition.json 09:20 +303 MSGJ talk contribs (add some missing labels)
- diffhist m Module:Banner shell 08:57 +120 MSGJ talk contribs (non-existent pages will not be treated as articles)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome 05:01 +288 HLHJ talk contribs (→What to do about obsolete or original research articles: thank you!) Tag: Reply