WP:ARC

Requests for arbitration

recent changes
purge this page
view or discuss this template

Request name	Motions	Initiated	Votes
User repeatedly causing issues and not engaging in talk to resolve dispute		25 December 2020	0/0/0

[edit]

Open cases

Currently, no arbitration cases are open.

[edit]

Recently closed cases (Past cases)

Case name	Closed
Venezuelan politics	25 May 2024

Clarification and Amendment requests

Request name	Motions	Case	Posted
Amendment request: Article titles and capitalisation	none	(orig. case)	7 June 2024
Clarification request: mentioning the name of off-wiki threads	none	none	4 June 2024
Amendment request: India-Pakistan	none	(orig. case)	7 June 2024
Clarification request: Contentious topics restrictions	none	none	10 June 2024

Arbitrator motions

Motion name	Date posted
Block of Rp2006	18 June 2024

Shortcuts

WP:ARC
WP:A/R/C

Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority).

Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests.

Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace.

To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.

File an arbitration request

This page is for statements, not discussion.

If you must reply to another user's statement, do so in your own section (more information).
Your section must not contain more than 500 words (Word Count Tool; internal gadget). This includes your replies to other users. To request an extension, either make the request in your statement section or email the clerks email list.
Arbitrators or clerks may refactor or delete statements, eg off-topic or unproductive remarks, without warning.
Banned users may request arbitration via the committee contact page; don't try to edit this page.
Under no circumstances should you remove requests from this page, or open a case (even for accepted requests), unless you are an arbitrator or clerk.
After a request is filed, the arbitrators will vote on accepting or declining the case. The <0/0/0> tally counts the arbitrators voting accept/decline/recuse.
Declined case requests are logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Declined requests. Accepted case requests are opened as cases, and logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Cases once closed.

User repeatedly causing issues and not engaging in talk to resolve dispute

Initiated by Amo247 (talk) at 07:21, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Involved parties

Amo247 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
Srsseehra (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Username (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request

[diff of notification Srsseehra]
[diff of notification Username]

Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried

Link 1
Link 2

Statement by Amo247

Replace this comment with your statement. Dear admins and volunteers of Wikipedia, i have been put in time out before for engaging with this user in regards to information on this page as well as other similar ones which have since been deleted. This user keeps editing pages putting in incorrect information and not providing any cites either because they are wrong. They are purposely disrupting wikipedia with their own agenda that is not factual. They are not engaging in discussion and providing any proof or references. Before I get blocked again, please intervene.

Statement by Srsseehra

Statement by Username

Statement by Deepfriedokra

@Amo247: Not an ArbCom clerk, but I think that WP:AN/I or WP:DRN would be the more appropriate venues. Have you discussed this at either of those yet? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:56, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely a content dispute. Page reverted to status quo ante and protected. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:11, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And then it was pointed out to me that I'd reverted to a copyvio. Best Christmas ever. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:16, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Statement by WaltCip

Nowhere near ripe and a horribly malformed request. Summarily reject. WaltCip-(talk) 16:05, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Statement by {Non-party}

Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.

User repeatedly causing issues and not engaging in talk to resolve dispute: Clerk notes

This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

User repeatedly causing issues and not engaging in talk to resolve dispute: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>

Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)