Jump to content

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by L235 (talk | contribs) at 16:42, 23 October 2020 (User:HersiliaAramazd: close). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Requests for arbitration

Premature. Now at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents § User:HersiliaAramazd. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 16:42, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Initiated by WMrapids (talk) at 16:12, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Involved parties

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried

Statement by WMrapids

This is a new user who has shown unwavering support for Azerbaijani military actions in the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and does not appear to be here for encyclopedic reasons. They have made inflammatory comments in their edit summaries in support of Azerbaijan, such as here.

In the first edit I noticed with the user possible canvassing, they pinged other Azerbaijani users on a talk page, saying that my edit in an infobox "seems to be aimed at disrupting the article, and assisting the Armenian POV by hiding the front-line changes" of the Azerbaijan military. I told the user to use good faith with my edits and per the Templates section in WP:CANVASS, I notified the user on their talk page. They quickly removed my notice. Other notices about the possible canvassing were placed in related talk pages, such as here. They then bombarded my talk page with more accusations of WP:BATTLE (to be fair, I did not know it was a level 3 warning as I used the recommended notification from the Template section, but how does a newer user know this much?). After making attempts to disengage with the user, they began edit warring on my own talk page. I strongly believe that this user is not here to build an encyclopedia and recommend that appropriate actions be taken to prevent this type of behavior from jeopardizing the integrity of Wikipedia.--WMrapids (talk) 16:12, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Statement by HersiliaAramazd

Statement by Deepfriedokra

@WMrapids: Ahem. This belongs at WP:ANI or some form of dispute resolution --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:19, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Statement by {Non-party}

Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.

This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

User:HersiliaAramazd: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>

Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)