Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Middayexpress

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ryanoo (talk | contribs) at 21:35, 5 November 2018 (→‎Comments by other users). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Middayexpress

Middayexpress (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected


04 November 2018

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets

  • This account was created on May 10, few days after blocking socks Geneticanthro, Soupforone, ...etc. [1].
  • Same interests as Middayexpress/Soupforone . All this new user edits are TOTALLY focused on pages which were persistently edited before by Middayexpress/Soupforone [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17].
  • He doesn't seem to be a new user at all. There is NO WAY that this user is a new one.
  • He did identical edits on the same page here [18], [19] ,and he was also edit warring with other users over those edits [20], [21], [22].
  • The same persistent obsession with redefining Black Nationalism and Pan Africanism [23], [24].
  • The same obsession with the Pan African flag [25], [26], [27], [28]. He did almost identical edits on the same page here [29], [30]
  • He uses the same language and style of writing and he has the same behavior of making fake propaganda, attacking and threatening other users who don’t agree with him [31], [32], [33], [34], [35]
  • The same habit of using the word “formatting” or “format” in edit summaries [36].[37], [38], [39].
  • The same behavior of trying to link some parts of Sub-Saharan Africa to North Africa [40], [41], [42].
  • The editing style of making a major edit quickly followed by a minor edit such as [43], [44] and [45], [46] Middayexpress/Soupforone also had the same habit [47], [48].
  • The same behavior of editing the languages section (which was persistently edited before by Middayexpress/Soupforone) on the same page [49] [50], [51], [52].
  • In addition to the checkuser, I would like the admins to thoroughly evaluate the behavioral evidence (which is very clear in this case) as this user is known for using VPNs, proxies and so on, he before insisted on the use of checkuser and then later was confirmed to be a super persistent sock puppeteer!!!. Thanks in advance. Ryanoo (talk) 11:41, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Just wanted to point out, if it isn't already obvious, that this is an attempt to confuse the issue in a content dispute. -Roxy, in the middle. wooF 10:14, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@ -Roxy, in the middle. wooF Thank you for your input. On what basis did you build this conclusion??!! I think the one who is clearly confusing the issue is this suspected sock which is an additional evidence of his sock puppetry as Middayexpress/Soupfrone had the same habit, this suspected sock was disruptively editing a Wikipedia page and was refusing to engage in the talk page and after many warnings, he did and once I refuted his claims, he refused to continue the discussion on the talk page and came to attack me personally and threaten me on my page which is also an additional evidence of his sock puppetry as Middayexpress/Soupfrone had the same exact habit!!!!. Is it wrong to fight the persistent vandals and sock puppeteers such as Middayexpress/Soupfrone?? Is this your way to reward me for fighting vandalism and sock puppeteers?!! Sorry Mr. Roxy, but I really can't get you. It seems you don't know much about Middayexpress/Soupfrone and his very long history of persistence vandalism and sock puppeting. I know this person very well and I have been battling him for quite a long time, this guy has been vandalizing Wikipedia for many years. I am sure that would't be your conclusion, If you know this guy very well or If you read the report carefully or If you take 5 minutes to evaluate the super clear behavioral evidence!!!!. I agree with you that I might have used a harsh way in dealing with this suspected sock and I am really sorry for this as It is against the policy, but I did this only because I am 100 % SURE, no not 100 %, because I am 10000% sure of what I am saying about this suspected sock. I am a human Mr. Roxy, not a robot and any human with blood running through his veins and a bit of scientific honesty will get angry If he watches vandals and unchallenged sock puppeteers destroying one of main the sources of knowledge in our world. Unfortunately the persistence appearance of people like Middayexpress/Soupfrone on Wikipedia discourages the good users from editing and are why Wikipedia occasionally gets a bad name. Thank you again for your input and sorry for any inconvenience. Have a nice day. Ryanoo (talk) 13:49, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
have you finished yet?Roxy, in the middle. wooF 15:08, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Middayexpress&oldid=867462495"