Jump to content

User talk:Amorymeltzer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Costco bear
Slap!
Since 2009
Since 2018
Since 2018
Bot operator top icon
Alternate account: Amory
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Amorymeltzer (talk | contribs) at 11:03, 8 June 2018 (→‎Template:WikiProject Music: Database reports). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

I use the Modern skin — if anything doesn't look right to you, upgrade!
Amory prefers to receive notifications. Please use {{ping}} or {{reply to}} when you reply to this user on other pages. No talkback messages are needed.

12:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Fauna, Inc

Hi @Amorymeltzer,

Thank you for correcting my title of the page and moving it appropriately.

Can I please request your review of my Draft page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Fauna,_Inc

Greatly appreciate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dodilp (talkcontribs) 23:51, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dodilp — if you want a thorough review of your draft, may I suggest the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process? All you need to do is add {{subst:submit}} to the top of your draft and a seasoned reviewer will be along. They're backed up, so it might take a few weeks, but that's the easiest process. I'll add that I think you'll need more reliable third-party sources; it's not clear to me that the links show general notability. ~ Amory (utc) 00:54, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @Amorymeltzer -- given that this is a technical topic, there are citations from DZone, InfoQ and other technical sources that have good credibility. I saw how this aligns with other similar tech companies that have some Wikipedia entries, and looks like it is comparable. I have taken your feedback and put in the tag for review, but the wait period is 2 months now, looks like the review team has a big backlog. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dodilp (talkcontribs)

Not to be nit-picky, but...

"There is some evidence Pbsouthwood has at least thought about the concept of adminship..." (change as to has) (I am talking about your vote in this RfA.)

I had to read the sentence a few times, so I thought I'd let you know. --JustBerry (talk) 14:12, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, thank you! I appreciate small, nitpicky grammar fixes. ~ Amory (utc) 14:32, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You have made some insightful comments, and they should be read without such distractions! It relates to the question I posed earlier (#5) about AfD involvement and demonstrating knowledge/practical experience with deletions on the English Wikipedia. --JustBerry (talk) 14:36, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Appealing a block. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Review my contribs

@Amorymeltzer: Review my rollback contribs because it will be expired at 2 June 2018. :-) Thank you, Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 14:16, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it over and I think it'd be good to go over to WP:PERM/R and request it there through the typical procedure. ~ Amory (utc) 00:52, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Done at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback#Siddiqsazzad001. Thank you, Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 04:39, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2018).

Administrator changes

added None
removed Al Ameer sonAliveFreeHappyCenariumLupoMichaelBillington

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • IP-based cookie blocks should be deployed to English Wikipedia in June. This will cause the block of a logged-out user to be reloaded if they change IPs. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. For the time being, it only affects users of the desktop interface.
  • The Wikimedia Foundation's Anti-Harassment Tools team will build granular types of blocks in 2018 (e.g. a block from uploading or editing specific pages, categories, or namespaces, as opposed to a full-site block). Feedback on the concept may be left at the talk page.
  • There is now a checkbox on Special:ListUsers to let you see only users in temporary user groups.
  • It is now easier for blocked mobile users to see why they were blocked.

Arbitration

  • A recent technical issue with the Arbitration Committee's spam filter inadvertently caused all messages sent to the committee through Wikipedia (i.e. Special:EmailUser/Arbitration Committee) to be discarded. If you attempted to send an email to the Arbitration Committee via Wikipedia between May 16 and May 31, your message was not received and you are encouraged to resend it. Messages sent outside of these dates or directly to the Arbitration Committee email address were not affected by this issue.

Miscellaneous


Please comment on Talk:Germanic peoples

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Germanic peoples. Legobot (talk) 07:20, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

21:54, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018 GOCE newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors June 2018 News

Welcome to the June 2018 GOCE newsletter, in which you will find Guild updates since the February edition. Progress continues to be made on the copyediting backlog, which has been reduced to 7 months and reached a new all-time low. Requests continue to be handled efficiently this year, with 272 completed by the end of May (an average completion time of 10.5 days). Fewer than 10% of these waited longer than 20 days, and the longest wait time was 29 days.

Wikipedia in general, and the Guild in particular, experienced a deep loss with the death on 20 March of Corinne. Corinne (a GOCE coordinator since 1 July 2016) was a tireless aide on the requests page, and her peerless copyediting is a part of innumerable GAs and FAs. Her good cheer, courtesy and tact are very much missed.

March drive: The goal was to remove June, July and August 2017 from our backlog and all February 2018 Requests (a total of 219 articles). This drive was an outstanding success, and by the end of the month all but eight of these articles were cleared. Of the 33 editors who signed up, 19 recorded 277 copy edits (425,758 words).

April blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 15 through 21 April, focusing on Requests and the last eight articles tagged in August 2017. At the end of the week there were only 17 pending requests, with none older than 17 days. Of the nine editors who signed up, eight editors completed 22 copy edits (62,412 words).

May drive: We set out to remove September, October and November 2017 from our backlog and all April 2018 Requests (a total of 298 articles). There was great success this month with the backlog more than halved from 1,449 articles at the beginning of the month to a record low of 716 articles. Officially, of the 20 who signed up, 15 editors recorded 151 copy edits (248,813 words).

Coordinator elections: It's election time again. Nominations for Guild coordinators (who will serve a six-month term for the second half of 2018) have begun, and will close at 23:59 UTC on 15 June. All Wikipedia editors in good standing are eligible, and self-nominations are encouraged. Voting will take place between 00:01 UTC on 16 June and 23:59 UTC on 30 June.

June blitz: Stay tuned for this one-week copy-editing blitz, which will take place in mid-June.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Corinne, Jonesey95, Miniapolis, Reidgreg and Tdslk.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:26, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Music

I do not believe that there was a consensus to delete Template:WikiProject Music. What was the reason for deletion? Please {{ping}} me when you respond. --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:54, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Of the five people involved in the discussion (nom+4) you were the only one advocating it be kept as such. Your argument amounted to consensus can change, but nobody seemed to be convinced. Moreover, absent any evidence that consensus has or is likely to change, it's not a particularly strong argument. Thryduulf did !vote deprecate, but while I found that to be a strong argument, it was likewise unconvincing to other participants. I even went and relisted the discussion twice, on the chance that more folks (perhaps from your outreach) would participate and would might thus better weigh the proposed arguments, but that did not happen. I stand by my closing statement. ~ Amory (utc) 01:25, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In your close you referred to the DBR. What is the DBR please? Thincat (talk) 08:50, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Thincat: That'd be WP:DBR, aka Database Reports. Specifically Wikipedia:Database reports/Broken WikiProject templates, which is what Plastikspork was referring to. It reports uses of nonexistent wikiproject templates, and is somewhat regularly cleaned up. ~ Amory (utc) 11:03, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Template:WikiProject Music

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Template:WikiProject Music. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jax 0677 (talk) 02:04, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]