User talk:Legacypac

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Robert McClenon (talk | contribs) at 16:26, 23 May 2018 (→‎Draft:Terufumi Sasaki: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

M

Request for review

Dear Legacypac, thank you for your feedback. As I already wrote in the former message, I noticed that my article needed to be improved and I understand that you stay by your assessment. Now I have submitted in my sandbox a new version of my draft Susy Rottonara with all reliable references. I am a researcher of minority languages in European culture and I came across this woman, as she is the promoter of the Wikipedia Ladina in ladin language. Thank you in advance for the time you will spend to review my article. Best regards.Johannade57 (talk) 07:20, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts pasted in the sandbox can't be moved. Please put it at Draft:Susy Rottonara User:Johannade57 Legacypac (talk) 09:31, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Legacypac, thank you so much for your help. Best regards Johannade57 (talk) 06:58, 23 May 2018 (UTC) Dear Legacypac, thank you for your review. The international awarded productions are supported by reliable sources. I have cancelled the references to the user's generated sources and I have substituded the reference to the publication on her own website with the link to the festival. I hope now it is ok. Of course you already got the topic watchlisted, as I put it for review some time ago, but there were many things to improve as you noticed. Thank you for your time. Best regards. Johannade57 (talk) 14:45, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

28 April 2018 submission review of the page Ben-Soussan T.D.

Hello Legacypac, thank you for your message. It is the first I try to create a new page on the English Wikipedia and your suggestions and tips are very helpful. Thank you very much, sicerely Pasciutoale (talk) , 28 April 2018 (UTC)

On the fence if Behavioral Signals meets WP:CORPDEPTH

Hi! I would be so grateful for your help in understanding why there is a possible issue as to if Behavioral Signals meets Corpdepth guidelines. I read in these guidelines that "Wikipedia bases its decision about whether an organization is notable enough to justify a separate article on the verifiable evidence that the organization or product has attracted the notice of reliable sources unrelated to the organization or product." Behavioral Signals and/or its founders have been mentioned in articles in the New York Times, LA Times, Washington Post and other news sources which have featured emotion recognition and behavioral analytics. Companies, like Affectiva who do emotion recognition in faces, and Beyond Verbal, that analyze emotions from vocal intonations, have a corporate page. Behavioral Signals is in the emotions speech/voice industry, as is Beyond Verbal. We want to explain what is this new trend, especially in the age of conversational AI, voice assistants.

I would be grateful if you could help me in understanding ways I can make the Behavioral Signals page fit better to the Wikipedia guidelines.

ChessQueen1 (talk) 14:41, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please put this information on the talkpage of the draft. A reviewer will find it quite helpful. Legacypac (talk) 14:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
User:ChessQueen1 - Your only edits have been made to the draft for Behavioral Signals and to inquire about its acceptance. Do you have a connection to Behavioral Signals? Robert McClenon (talk) 16:57, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
User:Robert McClenon - To answer your question, I know Behavioral Signals team. Is that an issue? I want to be objective and I believe what I have written is the truth. ChessQueen1 (talk) 18:52, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
User:ChessQueen1 - Your only edits are to Behavioral Signals and to have it accepted. When you say that you know the team, are you a member of the team? Or are you simply editing Wikipedia to help out your friends get their own page? Robert McClenon (talk) 14:31, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
User:Robert McClenon - My affiliation to the company shouldn't have any impact as to it getting a wikipedia page. I know the company very well and nothing that I have written is false. ChessQueen1 (talk) 09:10, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for rejection of my Ray Carr article

Respectfully, Legacypac, the reason you rejected my resubmission is the VERY REASON it was resubmitted in the FIRST PLACE. We had a FEATURE ARTICLE that appeared this past Friday in The Cleveland Plain Dealer. It is reference number 4. You can check the link out here: http://www.cleveland.com/ministerofculture/index.ssf/2018/05/ray_carr_a_cleveland_renaissan.html

That is the second article strictly about Ray since this page has been submitted. Ray's show is known outside the US. In fact, we just heard from Petula Clark's current tour manager this morning, asking if he could share her current interview with Ray (aired last Tuesday, May 8) on social media.

So, the reason you rejected it is in the article. MULTIPLE reasons are in the article. WILL YOU PLEASE TELL ME WHAT IN HELL I HAVE TO DO TO GET THIS DAMN THING INCLUDED ALREADY??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CVActor1 (talk • contribs) 08:08, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Respectfully, Legacypac, the reason you rejected my resubmission is the VERY REASON it was resubmitted in the FIRST PLACE. We had a FEATURE ARTICLE that appeared this past Friday in The Cleveland Plain Dealer. It is reference number 4. You can check the link out here: http://www.cleveland.com/ministerofculture/index.ssf/2018/05/ray_carr_a_cleveland_renaissan.html

That is the second article strictly about Ray since this page has been submitted. Ray's show is known outside the US. In fact, we just heard from Petula Clark's current tour manager this morning, asking if he could share her current interview with Ray (aired last Tuesday, May 8) on social media.

So, the reason you rejected it is in the article. MULTIPLE reasons are in the article. WILL YOU PLEASE TELL ME WHAT IN HELL I HAVE TO DO TO GET THIS DAMN THING INCLUDED ALREADY???

Here's the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ray_Carr

JUST TELL ME WHAT TO WRITE, INCLUDE, I DON'T CARE. I AM SICK OF THE REJECTIONS. AND CONSIDERING SOME OF THE OTHER SUBJECTS INCLUDED ON THIS WEBSITE, I SEE NO REASON NOT TO PUT THIS ONE LITTLE PAGE ON IT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CVActor1 (talk • contribs) 08:11, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:CVActor1 - Stop SHOUTING. It is rude, and is not likely to get your article accepted. I suggest that you ask for the opinions of other experienced editors at the Teahouse politely, rather then shouting at one reviewer. Robert McClenon (talk) 10:19, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Also, you have become a single-purpose account who is doing nothing but edit one article and demand its acceptance. Do you have a conflict of interest, such as being paid? That would explain why you are so angry and so demanding and why you are not editing anything else. If you are not connected with Ray Carr, take a chill pill and get a little exposure to Wikipedia by editing a few other articles. If you have a conflict of interest, declare it. Robert McClenon (talk) 10:23, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
User:CVActor1 - If you really are sure that your page is ready for article space, you have the right to move it into article space, and other editors have the right to nominate it for Articles for Deletion. If you are ready to defend it, maybe that is what you should do. That is definitely a better idea than just shouting at a reviewer. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:48, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Robert McClenon, First of all, I wrote to Legacypac because it was the suggestion of one of the many pages on this website to write to the reviewer and request why he/she has rejected my article. If that is you, then, yet again, I'm not being answered as to what to do about this in any constructive manner that helps at all. If it is not you, then why are you responding on Legacypac's page? Now as far as your accusations go, most of these assumptions (and we all know what that word means) are incorrect. As far as "getting exposure by editing a few other articles", I have added numerous amounts of information to many other articles on this website over the years. If you're looking for my name to prove it, I'm not always signed in when I do this. But do not for one minute assume that I just edit one article. However, I have been trying to write this article and get it accepted for years now, and no matter what I add, remove, fix or write, I keep getting the same answer. "Ray is not notable because the articles are mentions." They are not just mentions. At least two of them are articles strictly about Ray. And this was resubmitted because Ray has had a second feature article that appeared in this Friday's Plain Dealer, Cleveland's main newspaper. No one seems to have even noticed that edition in the credits, #4, since the rejection message is identical to the one I received on this article about 3 years ago. Here is the new article link: http://www.cleveland.com/ministerofculture/index.ssf/2018/05/ray_carr_a_cleveland_renaissan.html. It appeared in print on the first page of the 5/11/18 Cleveland Plain Dealer Friday Magazine, and has been online since 5/10/18 at this link. Apparently none of you have noticed, which makes me wonder if anyone is really reading this over at all. Why am I "shouting"? Well, you try working on an article for years without success and see how frustrated you get when no one seems to really listen to you, answer your questions or read what you write. I also have to say that if you think I am rude, you telling me that I have become a single-purpose account who has a conflict of interest, should take a chill pill, and am getting paid to do this, certainly seems to be very rude to me. I am not being paid for this, and have never been paid for it, so I resent that assumption. I do not need to take a chill pill. I have asked numerous times in this process for some suggestions on how to write this article, what you all want to see or not see in it, and what I need to do to finally get it accepted. I either get the same answers on things I have already fixed (like the references, for example), or no answers at all. So instead of insulting me, maybe a little help, that has been requested way too many times without success over the years, would be far more productive, don't you think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CVActor1 (talk • contribs) 06:07, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Robert is another AfC reviewer - one of the best. He is welcome to respond on my talkpage anytime. Given the rudeness you should be glad you got a response from any volunteer. Unlike you, we have no financial or personal connection to the many subjects we work on. We have a very good understanding of what will survive a deletion discussion on Wikipedia and why. Nearly 100% of AfC submissions I accept stay on the site. In my opinion your submission would not survive a deletion discussion. If we need a newspaper article from this week to establish notability on a musician it is NOT established. There are plenty of perfectly successful good musicians that don't warrent a wikipedia article.
With that said User:CVActor1 - I'm going to watch and ensure that your submission is no longer considered by our volunteer reviewers. AFC is an optional process run by volunteers. As an editor you may move the page to article space from draft space yourself with no further involvement from the AfC project. Legacypac (talk) 07:11, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
User:Legacypac Exactly what are you saying you will do about User:CVActor1? Please do not sink to his level. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:47, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LegacyPac, where in my last paragraph was I rude? I never called anyone a name, never told them they were being paid ("Unlike you, we have no financial or personal connection to the many subjects we work on.") when they weren't (What do I have to say to make that clear? college radio does not pay anyone, okay? If you don't believe me, call any college radio station and they will tell you this.), never told anyone to take a chill pill, and I find it interesting that I have "become a single-purpose account" in your minds, yet this is the first time I have resubmitted this article in FOUR YEARS. When have I done nothing else if I haven't submitted it in four years? Yet, you and Robert see fit to continue to insult, and now threaten me with "I'm going to watch and ensure that your submission is no longer considered by our volunteer reviewers". I don't have anyone jumping on the wagon. I do not gang up on people and still say that they are rude. I get that you are all volunteers here. Guess what? So am I. I do not get paid for any of this. Out of exasperation, stretching back over 4 years, I typed one and half sentences in caps, which simply asked - not demanded - asked - what I needed to do to finally get this article included, and that makes me rude. Yet you and Robert threaten me and call me names and you are not rude? Think about that. I remember that this site had requests up recently for donations to stay in business. Insulting people who want to add to your website is no way to do that, regardless of what you think they've said to you. You want me to move my article? Fine. How do I do that? I don't need anymore threats, insults or name-calling. Especially when all of this is a result of not being given the really constructive help to fix any of this in the first place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CVActor1 (talk • contribs) 08:10, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:CVActor1 - I have not threatened you, and saying that I have threatened you, when I have not, amounts to a personal attack. I have cautioned you about conduct that can get you blocked from editing, but I am not an administrator and cannot block you. If you want advice on what to do to get your article accepted, ask for advice at the Teahouse, although you may be advised that nothing that is done to an article about a non-notable person will get the article accepted. If you want to move the article to article space, just move it. If you need advice on how to do that, you may ask at the Teahouse or the Help Desk. Please do not accuse us of threats. Please do not SHOUT. (The idea that the use of ALL CAPS is shouting is not unique to Wikipedia but is well-known in all on-line communities. Anyway, you knew that it was shouting, which is why you did it. We only disagree as to whether you are more likely to get an answer by shouting your demands for one.) Go ahead and move the page to article space, or ask for advice. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:47, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
User:CVActor1 - Also, once again, are you employed by Ray Carr? You seemed to say, four years ago, that you were. You seem to be saying, now, that you are not. Either you were and are, or you never were and still are not, or you were and no longer are. Please answer the question. It isn't optional. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:47, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

11:48:27, 18 May 2018 review of submission by FeWorld


Hi, you recently declined the submission for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ice_Poseidon_2 on grounds of notability. Could you provide some feedback on the sources used since I thought coverage from respected sources such as Rolling Stone, Next Web, Polygon, Kotaku, Vice, CBS, Fox and more would show sufficient notability. I also have a question on the name of the article since it should be created as just 'Ice Poseidon' not 'Ice Poseidon 2' (since this draft is a restoration of a deleted page) and the page is move protected. Do I have to request an admin to move it first?

Thanks FeWorld (talk) 11:48, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you will need an Admin. Many watch this page so hopefully one will look into this. Legacypac (talk) 11:52, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If and when the draft becomes acceptable, an admin can be pinged and the protection lowered to allow for the move. Primefac (talk) 13:18, 18 May 2018 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]
Okay, do you have any feedback on the sources given since they are from respected sites such as Rolling Stone, Next Web, Polygon, Kotaku, Vice, CBS, Fox and more before I resubmit or am I likely to be declined again for some other notability test. FeWorld (talk) 14:18, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Given the history of the page I'm not inclined to review it again. Your account has sufficent age to request an Admin to deal with it. AfC is an optional process. Legacypac (talk) 18:03, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Auditor-General Republic of Namibia

I've just deleted The Auditor-General Republic of Namibia (which you accepted and moved to mainspace) as it was a clear copy-paste from the official website - please be more careful when reviewing drafts. Cheers! :) [stwalkerster|talk] 20:11, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually that is not a correct action. I examined that before acceptance and found the material repeated was direct quotes from the country's constitution and enabling law which can't possibility be copyrighted. Surely in every country it is legal to republish sections of such documents - please restore User:Stwalkerster Legacypac (talk) 07:39, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Publication

Hi Legacypac! I'm a new wiki contributor and I'm getting my start by making a few edits here and there as well as creating pages for some comediennes and artists that I'm into. I've tried to make a couple pages and I haven't got it right yet, but I'll keep trying! One of my pages was called "Abbey Luck" and was marked for speedy deletion, but I didn't catch it in time and now it's gone! Would you mind restoring it so I can look at the content? It's okay if it doesn't end up meeting the notability requirements, I'll probably just skip that one plug away on other people I'd like to add (that may get rejected, haha!). I'd still like to get the copy though because I didn't save it, for future reference. but the reason said it was deleted said "filled with Spam links"... I def didn't put spam in there but maybe we have different views on what that means. Any way, thanks for the help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mysssteriousss (talk • contribs) 01:47, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an Admin - you need one of them to restore or send you a copy. I don't recall the page so can't offer much advice. Legacypac (talk) 15:12, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:01, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Due to a lack of references and notability, I would like to speedy delete the following page : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sonia_Jam

However, before I delete I would like to use the content as an English translation for an already existing French page : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonia_Jam

How do I do that? I added the Template:Translated* tag to my entry, but the page was never translated. I asked in IRC forum but they were unable to give me an answer. Can an admin take care of this? Thanks Abonzz (talk) 13:35, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 13:40:37, 20 May 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Abonzz


Legacypac I would like to speedy delete this page. However, the content can be used as an English translation for the following page:https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonia_Jam So before I delete, can an admin add the English content to the existing page in French wikipedia? Abonzz (talk) 13:40, 20 May 2018 (UTC) Abonzz (talk) 13:40, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We can't put Englsih content on French wikipedia. I can't delete your page but many Admins watch my page so maybe one will do it. Legacypac (talk) 15:10, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
My immediate reaction to this is, unsurprisingly, that we have enough backlogs here without doing other Wikipedia's work for them. Then I see that it's already a translation from the French article. The only way I can delete the page quickly is if it's moved to an Abonzz sub-page and they put {{Db-u1}} on it. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:21, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well, for U1, "Pages which have previously been moved are only eligible if all previous titles were in the user's userspace". WP:G7 should be applicable as declines and comments aren't really content of the page. Galobtter (pingó mió) 15:30, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
(talk) I can delete the page. It's the English translation that I would like to keep. However, on the French page, I don't see the "Dans d’autres langues" menu for displaying the page in English. How did you access the English translation on the French page? Thanks Abonzz (talk) 15:32, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

19:33:20, 20 May 2018 review of submission by 109.145.42.244


Hi there, first off, thanks so much for reviewing the Apache Arrow article, I appreciate it.

The article has been declined as not notable, but in the references, Apache Arrow is mentioned in a number of reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. For example, InfoWorld has over 1 million monthly visitors. ZDNet has almost 40 million monthly visitors for its site alone. I won't go through each of the other sources, but they're all online periodicals with significant readership and influence. Could you help me understand what other sorts of things you'd need to see here to view this as notable? Thank you!

109.145.42.244 (talk) 19:33, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Portal guidelines etc

Hi,

Would you be interested in being involved in this?

Kind regards, Cesdeva (talk) 20:07, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Page Title

Thank you Legacypac for taking the time to review and accept my article for Wikipedia. Please may I request your assistance to help add something to the Page Title - I'd like to add the acronym SAMCODES. JLL87 (talk) 07:09, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No that would go against our naming conventions. Legacypac (talk) 10:54, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please clarify - how is that against naming conventions? Are acronyms not allowed? If that is the case then please could you create a redirect as you suggested on my talk page. Many thanks JLL87 (talk) 13:00, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
We create at the proper name North Atlantic Treaty Organization or NATO not a combination of the two. I already created SAMCODES Legacypac (talk) 13:10, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Safka page

Hi - I went back and reviewed and fixed the links on the Eric Safka page and would like to know if it's ok now. I discovered the link to the album of the year was incorrect and have fixed that as well. Advice on how to make this better is always welcome. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EchoSound (talk • contribs) 13:38, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Scam accusations against cryptocurrencies

I think someone who has actually written articles about cryptocurrencies should judge is Monacoin is a scam. I want someone else to review this article. Draft:Monacoin The article for Monacoin already has a Japanese version.

I will find a cryptocurrency article editor to review it right now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MingT8 (talk • contribs) 15:23, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My statement is accurate. By submitting to AfC you asked for a review. If you don't want to take the review on board don't use AfC. [1] Legacypac (talk) 15:27, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For all the work you've been putting in to AfC - nice to see that we are finally back under 1000 KylieTastic (talk) 19:13, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yahoo did we get under 1000? Legacypac (talk) 19:19, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, hopefully we can keep it there... if only people would stop resubmitting utter crap... KylieTastic (talk) 22:02, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
lowest is 996 at one point. Quek157 (talk) 23:43, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Dani Bell and the Tarantist CSD

I might be missing something on the draft, I couldn't find anything that made it an attack page. Before I removed the tag, I just wanted to be sure I didn't miss something. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:44, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is a bunch of total BS in there like chasing wild animals in Vancouver. It's mocking the subject and maybe a hoax. Legacypac (talk) 19:49, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Gotcha, I'll have a look into it a bit more. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:50, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There was a cleaner version prior to the IP edits. I rev del'd the possible BLP vios and reverted the draft back. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:57, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Page deleted Lisa-Jayne Lewis

Hi - can you help me. I thought that the page I had written was in line with the many other pages of a similar content. I had used many citations, more than on some allowed articles and the page in no way was promoting it was entirely information based I would have thought a notable person working in broadcasting with a citation on the European Broadcasting Union would have stood. I am just unsure how to go about restoring this and trying again in a way that passes. Wikipedia is very difficult to use, unless you are a computer geek and understand all the weird coding, is there not a more affable way to be able to help people create articles rather than just delete everything? It's difficult to talk to people, difficult to ask questions, difficult to achieve anything unless you are one of the greats, I genuinely thought Wikipedia was a community effort but I may have been mistaken in that, I just need so help and guidance. Lisajaynelewis (talk) 06:33, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you always talk about yourself in the 3rd person? Read WP:AUTOBIO please. Page suffered from a variety of things, including you just do not pass WP:N. Legacypac (talk) 08:04, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clara Anna Fontein

Good day Legacypac

I accept your opinion to make it part of Durbanville. I would however like to respectfully verify why I belief it is justifiable to have it as its own subject. It was never part of Durbanville. Population growth has caused that this original farm today falls under the jurisdiction of Durbanville. It was one of that original Tygerberg farms. Its was a landmark in the valley. Its also shows the urban creep that takes place in urban areas. I will however accept your decision if you still feels like it. I have altered certain parts of the article. If I include it under Durbanville, should I include everything I have written in this draft?

Thank you

User:Barry Ne — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barry Ne (talk • contribs) 15:59, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

page just looked really thin. All inhabited places are autonotable. You don't need AfC permission to move it to mainspace as you are an experiemced editor. Legacypac (talk) 00:59, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft Rejected for Lack of Notability

Hi Legacypac, I noticed that Draft:Vapor (Server-side Swift) was rejected again for a lack of notability. I created this article to provide a more complete view of server side swift. Since Vapor is a red link on the Swift (programming language) article, and similar server side swift projects like Perfect (server framework) and Kitura are equally notable, I thought the draft was filling in missing information. I have a couple metrics to prove that Vapor is equally (arguably more) notable than Kitura and Perfect. This first source shows the number of questions asked on Stack Overflow for each framework. Stack Overflow is a place for developers to ask questions, making it a great network to evaluate the usage and therefore notability of each framework.

Developer recognition is also shown by GitHub stars, which demonstrate each framework's popularity in the developer community. (http://www.timqian.com/star-history/#vapor/vapor&perfectlysoft/perfect&ibm-swift/kitura).

I believe that the sources added since my first review adequately show the notability of the subject and all are from reliable, secondary sources, but if you would like more sources, please let me know as there are many more I can add.

Thanks for your time! Confiture1271 (talk) 17:03, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Confiture1271 you are obviously ready to defend this if someone seeks to delete it. AfC reviews are completely optional. You are free to move the page to Article space yourself. Legacypac (talk) 00:50, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thank you for your suggestion to add to the Collections section of the page I am creating for Anna Wong(artist). It is much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaggitha (talk • contribs) 18:53, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:GWC Warranty

Can you provide specifics of references that do meet your guidelines? After deep review of your guidelines, I'm still incredibly confused as to why this continues to get rejected. Putting the same exact explanation as the previous reviewer does nothing to help me supply information that complies with your guidelines. I'd like to create something that fits your rules, but my sources are being declined when I see far inferior sources on other business pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattvanstone87 (talk • contribs) 20:32, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mattvanstone87 It takes time to understand exactly what rules apply to Wikipedia articles. We provide helpful links but there is no substitute for simply editing some existing articles. Creating a brand new article that will survive a deletion discussion is an advanced skill. Legacypac (talk) 00:53, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clive Wilkins

Hi Legacypac, I've been trying to get the Clive Wilkins entry onto Wikipedia. Proving his notability seems to be evading me, despite the man's success in being invited to influential venues, universities and conferences all over the world to speak on memory and perception using art and literature to illustrate his points, often his own art and literature. If his contribution was vacuous, he would hardly be likely to be invited anywhere. The University of Cambridge, department of Psychology, have made him their first artist in residence in a science department and kept him there for 6 years on the trot. It has never happened before. On some level these things are a measure of success, but I understand, not in terms of Wikipedia. I am surprised that some of the later references in the article don't convince you of the worth of the entry in Wiki terms. But that's me still not having worked out what is needed no doubt. I am working on it.:))) The peer reviewed articles and papers are published and have been distributed in notable and well respected journals, I could put up more, indeed I will improve the citations and present them with the academic status they deserve. Work which is not considered of worth is not published in academia. Reference 18 seems to go some way to providing an independent third party account of what Clive has done~ would you agree? If there was more like that would it help? The paintings, in many people eyes speak for themselves, he has been described as 'one of the UK's leading figurative artists' in the foreword to an exhibition catalogue of his work. Could I use that and quote the extract? Is that allowed or does that infringe a copyright or something? He has national newspaper mentions for his paintings could they be used? If you could tell me what I should be looking for, that would help~ I find it a little hard reading and understanding the wiki pages that describe these things, I am not used to them yet and can think of multiple ways of interpreting what they mean. My problem is I am new to this~ as you can tell~ my apologies. Give me time to sort this out please~ I think I can do it~ I am working on it~ Hope to hear from you. I hope you are allowed to reply. Best wishes in any event. Jean Scott Thomson (talk) 23:25, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Jean Scott ThomsonJean Scott Thomson (talk) 23:25, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Creating a new page in Wikipedia that will survive a deletion discussion is tough - an advanced skill. You are better served editong some existing pages to get a feel for things. You are also free to move your Draft to Article space yourself if you wish. Legacypac (talk) 00:56, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

06:36:35, 23 May 2018 review of submission by Veronica111a


Good morning! I was trying to create a page about russian blogger Eugenia but all articles from reliable magazines like L'Officiel or Marie Claire are in russian language (links are attached). Does it mean that it is better to create first page in russian in wikipedia and after that create in english?

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.marieclaire.ru%2Fmoda%2Fevgeniya-epplbum-nachnite-s-horoshih-bazovyih-veschey-%2F&edit-text=

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lofficielrussia.ru%2Fbeauty%2Feugenia-applebum-carolina-herrera

Veronica111a (talk) 06:36, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Russian and English wikipedia operate under different rules and guidelines. Starting your effort at English Wikipedia by building a new page on a blogger using all Russian sources is going to be a very difficult process for you. I suggest contributing to existing pages for a while before attempting a new page. Legacypac (talk) 12:19, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PHP Tools for Visual Studio

Hello Legacypac, I noticed that you commented on my draft of PHP Tools for Visual Studio. Thank you very much for reading it and for your feedback.

You stated that it looks like an ad, but it's not your field of work. Sincerely, I'm just trying to describe the tool and I have seen that this is usually how other tools are described here in Wikipedia. However, I'm not interested in making it an ad.

Please, can you give suggestions on how to improve it? I'll be more than willing to apply the changes. Thank you. ~~Fernanda Liendo~~ —Preceding undated comment added 07:32, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's really not my field. You might try WikiProject Computing? Legacypac (talk) 14:48, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Response to all your comments/observations regarding Kopparapu Poets

For all Users and Administrators: User: Legacypac and Robert McClenon and User: Discospinster This note is in response to all your comments on my draft: Kopparapu Poets or Literary Duo: Kopparapu poets. While the former is found in the sandbox as a redirected draft, the second one is found in the edit summary/contributions page. Though the two drafts are having different heads, the content is same. In fact, I have summoned my colleague in English department yesterday night; he sat down on my laptop and edited the text. After his clearing it, I moved it into article space. Then a set of four notices flashed on the article page stating that the draft was under the finishing stage of review and should not have been moved to article space--Inform author. Probaly due to this all edits could have got undone. Thus User: Robert McClenon could not find any edits carried out by my fellow academic from English dept.

We are all academics in English and communication department in a reputed University in India, and keep writing to national and international journals in English. Yet with all humility we accept your suggestions and follow them.

With regard to the comments of User: Discospinster, I have a simple answer. All of you may kindly read a similar piece available in the English Wikipedia on Tirupati Venkata Kavulu and find out whether the comments/observations that you have made on my draft Kopparapu Poets applies to it? Also kindly examine whether the article Tirupati Venkata Kavulu is well sourced with independently available references? Whether the article Tirupati Venkata Kavulu is not written in praise of them? Was it written neutrally totally? It is interesting to note that for similar articles/write ups different yardsticks have been applied by reviewers be they the editors or the administrators. Same questions are posed again and again by different editors. For instance I have clarified that an identical piece in Telugu is already available in Telugu Wikipedia on Kopparapu Poets entitled as Kopparapu Sodara Kavulu [1]. In keeping with a call from Wikipedia English, I have written about same poets in English wikipedia. However, all of you kindly read this restponse at a time and arrive at a calculated decision whether to keep it?MUMACHA2203 (talk) 10:22, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://te.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B0%95%E0%B1%8A%E0%B0%AA%E0%B1%8D%E0%B0%AA%E0%B0%B0%E0%B0%AA%E0%B1%81_%E0%B0%B8%E0%B1%8B%E0%B0%A6%E0%B0%B0_%E0%B0%95%E0%B0%B5%E0%B1%81%E0%B0%B2%E0%B1%81

Rate of review

Seven approvals in ten minutes. I could see that rate for declines, but I genuinely think that you're not doing your due diligence when reviewing. Please slow down. I don't care if the backlog is 10 or 1000, we don't need to be reviewing pages that quickly. Primefac (talk) 15:49, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Terufumi Sasaki

Deleting this draft through the back door while it was being discussed at the Teahouse was not helpful. Please don't do that again. Some editors think that a stand-alone article is warranted. If so, at least we should have the draft available in draft space for reference. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:26, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Legacypac&oldid=842623913"