Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Amorymeltzer (talk | contribs) at 14:06, 16 April 2018 (→‎User:JSFarman: done (using userRightsManager)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

New page reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Shortcuts
See Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers for the granting guidelines. Applicants should show some evidence that they generally meet the guidelines outlined there, have a demonstrated need for the right, and that they have read and fully understood the tutorial at Wikipedia:New pages patrol.

User:Staszek Lem

I do review daily the new pages reported in User:AlexNewArtBot/PolandSearchResult. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:46, 11 April 2018 (UTC) Staszek Lem (talk) 18:46, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Question: Please confirm that you have read and fully understood the instructions at WP:NPP. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:22, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Adamfinmo

I have read the new requirements at NPP. I would like to continue patrolling new pages from time to time. AdamF in MO (talk) 19:19, 11 April 2018 (UTC) AdamF in MO :(talk) 19:19, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note User has made only 53 mainspace edits in the last 12 months. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:12, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done I was disinclined earlier for these same reasons — I don't need a ton of activity, but more than a passing interest is required, if only to be responsive to author concerns, AfD discussions, etc. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:15, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am somewhat perplexed by this. I was invited on my talk page to come here and request this. I read all the requirements and as far as I can see I meet all those requirements. Please accept some criticism. 1. Don’t invite people to this board who don’t qualify. It is quite demoralizing to be invited somewhere only to have a door slammed shut. 2. If there is a requirement that a reviewer meet a threshold of recent activity please post those in the requirements. Thank for all the hard work the clerks do here. Cheers. —AdamF in MO (talk) 20:06, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The invitations were based on a very loose set of criteria which did not take into account the levels of activity that would demonstrate sufficient experience. The actual according of user rights is up to admin discretion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:02, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

:::::@Kudpung:, it’s be nice if the criteria by which the administers make their decisions is somehow spelled out to avoid pointless requests from good faith editors. Had I known what the secret, undocumented expectations are, I would have never asked for the perms. The documentation should be updated to accurately reflect the expectations for acceptance. —AdamF in MO (talk) 01:35, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dial911

I am among the most active AfC reviewers and want to help at NPP. I have access to page curation and I edit/tag/fix newly created articles. Am I eligible to help now? Dial911 (talk) 04:29, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment This user has had 3 requests for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1][2][3]). — MusikBot talk 04:30, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dial911 has proven to be a good AfCer from everything I've seen. Legacypac (talk) 03:08, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Legacypac, Thanks for having some confidence in me Dial911 (talk) 03:22, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Although ACTRIAL has yet to return, I am inclined to support this request (I still think Dial911 is quite under experienced, but they are doing better work at AfC and I am comfortable with Legacypac's endorse). Alex Shih (talk) 03:28, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the user has a track record at AfC and some experience elsewhere, so I would personally support this request. L293D (☎ • ✎) 13:24, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
L293D, thanks mate! Dial911 (talk) 13:26, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:LynxTufts

Requesting as an active AfC reviewer. I was encouraged to do this on my talk page. LynxTufts (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:NottNott

Requesting right per this talk page discussion. I am an AfC reviewer and have read over the NPR guide, and will help out where I can. -NottNott 23:01, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:07, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Carwil

I'm a semi-regular AfC reviewer who is willing to help with NPP on occasion. I've edited for 10 years and try hard to respect the processes I get involved in. Carwil (talk) 19:53, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Done ~ Amory (u • t • c) 00:20, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:AmericanAir88

Hello, I am an AfC reviewer, Rollbacker, and Copy Editor. I have read over the NPR guide throughly. I am dedicated to improving and adding to wikipedia AmericanAir88 (talk) 21:23, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:JSFarman

I'm an active AfC reviewer. I'm requesting this permission at the suggestion of insertcleverphrasehere. I've studied the tutorial, and I'd like to help out with the backlog. JSFarman (talk) 04:57, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Done ~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:06, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:LukeSurl

Hello, I have been asked on my talk page to apply for this permission. I have formerly done work with WP:AfC without serious issues. I haven't done much reviewing recently, but may do some more reviewing in the future. I have read Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers and meet these requirements. LukeSurl t c 09:16, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bobherry

Hello I am currently an PC reviewer and rollbacker. I am requesting this flag to help me review new pages. Thank you. Bobherry Talk Edits 13:32, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/New_page_reviewer&oldid=836725643"