Arbitration Committee proceedings

Request name	Motions	Initiated	Votes
Anachronist		16 June 2024	0/5/0
Rio Grande 223		19 June 2024	0/1/0

[edit]

Open cases

Currently, no arbitration cases are open.

[edit]

Recently closed cases (Past cases)

Case name	Closed
Venezuelan politics	25 May 2024

Clarification and Amendment requests

Request name	Motions	Case	Posted
Request for clarification: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Kosovo	none	none	7 June 2011

Arbitrator motions

Motion name	Date posted
Block of Rp2006	18 June 2024

Requests for clarification

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification/Header

Request for clarification: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Kosovo

Initiated by AGK [•] at 14:42, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of any users involved or directly affected, and confirmation that all are aware of the request:

AGK (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) (initiator)
The other parties to the case might be considered to be involved, but the case is rather old and this clarification concerns general remedies, rather than ones about specific users.

Statement by AGK

Further to the confusion generated in this request for arbitration enforcement, I request that the Committee clarify which of the contradictory enforcement provisions of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Kosovo#Enforcement should be used. Is enforcement 1) or enforcement 2) the one that the community can enforce? AGK [•] 14:42, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Xeno: In order to ensure that all authoratitive Committee decision pages are kept updated, could we strike the enforcement provisions of Kosovo and place a note underneath noting that they are, as a practical matter, superseded by the other case decision? AGK [•] 09:27, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Statement by other user

Clerk notes

This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

Arbitrator views and discussion

Hmm... On a plain reading, those remedies seem to apply only to "parties of [the Kosovo] case"; and unless Alinor edited under a different username in 2006, s/he was not a party to that case.
In any case, Newyorkbrad suggested that the more recent WP:ARBMAC decision be leveraged instead, and it appears this was done. –xeno^talk 15:05, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
@AGK: The enforcement provisions still affect parties to the case, though it seems there is only one remedy that is still in effect (and that user has seemingly not edited since 2008). Though it would probably be a good idea to tuck a pointer to the ARBMAC decision in there somewhere - Kosovo is already noted as superseded by Macedonia at Wikipedia:General sanctions#Superseded sanctions. –xeno^talk 14:02, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Concur with Xeno, including his (and AGK's) suggestion of a cross-reference. Newyorkbrad (talk) 14:50, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I too concur with Xeno and his (and AGK's) suggestino of a cross-reference. Risker (talk) 15:53, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Me too.. um.. three.. ur.. four (oh never mind!)... or in long, I agree with Xeno and his/AGK's Suggestion of a cross-reference.. SirFozzie (talk) 19:28, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Me five-ish? The cross-ref idea seems a good one. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 15:22, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Pile ON!!!1! — Coren ^(talk) 14:17, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]