Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ingenuity (talk | contribs) at 13:25, 30 September 2023 (→‎User:Oronsay: done (using userRightsManager)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


New page reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Shortcuts
See Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers#Guidelines for granting for the granting guidelines. Guidelines include account age at least 90 days old, at least 500 edits to mainspace, demonstrated knowledge of page quality control (usually shown through participation in processes such as WP:AFD, WP:CSD, WP:AFC reviewing, etc.), no blocks or 3RR violations in the past 6 months, and no indications of undisclosed paid editing. Applicants should show some evidence that they generally meet the guidelines, have a demonstrated need for the right, and that they have read and fully understood the tutorial at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Editors may want to consider WP:NPPSCHOOL before applying.

User:Isochrone

Hello, I was previously granted NPP on probation and used it to review articles as suitable. I would appreciate if I could be granted the right permanently if an admin deems it fit. Thank you. – Isochrone (T) 16:55, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:OlifanofmrTennant

I see that the backlog is rather large and there is an upcoming Backlog drive which I wish to participate in. I was a AfC reviewer and it was recommended to me that I should participate in other areas of Wikipedia for various reasons. OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) Questions? 19:38, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) The relevant threads are User talk:OlifanofmrTennant#About a draft you accepted and User talk:OlifanofmrTennant#Multiple messages received about your work as an AfC reviewer. OlifanofmrTennant, this is purely some friendly advice but NPR is a somewhat harder and more demanding perm than AfC, and given your removal from AfC I would highly recommend you work on AfDs and content writing first before NPP. Thanks. VickKiang (talk) 00:59, 24 September 2023 (UTC) Updated on 23:14, 27 September 2023 (UTC).[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) OlifanofmrTennant, I second VickKiang here. NPP is demanding, more so than AfC. If you want to do maintenance work but are not ready for AfC/NPP yet please consider enrolling at the Countervandalism Unit Academy if you wish. #prodraxis connect 03:27, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done per the above. – Joe (talk) 05:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:ClydeFranklin

I was previously granted 1 month NPP (as the bot should tell you). During this time, I've admittedly done less than I hoped, but life has been busy and I think what I have done has been generally good. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 05:50, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Ingenuity (expires 00:00, 30 September 2023 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 05:50, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I also hope to help out with the backlog drive. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 05:52, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Trial extended until the end of the year. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wikiexplorationandhelping

I have a measurable experience with RFDs, AFDs, as well as CSDs. I would be a good person to help review pages, as well as to help the backlogging that exists at the moment. Thanks, Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 16:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. There seem to have been issues with some of your recent(ish) mainspace creations which suggest that you're not quite up to speed with all the relevant policies and expectations for new articles. I would suggest building some more experience at AfC and AfD and writing some nice clean articles on notable subjects if that's something you're interested in, then reapplying in a couple of months or so. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:10, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Thank you for the feedback. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 23:24, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:FatalFit

I was given temporary NPR until September 30, I'm requesting for my trial period to be extended or for the permission to not expire. Requesting early as I know requests take a while to be answered sometimes. Thank you! FatalFit | ✉ | ✓  22:53, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Ingenuity (expires 00:00, 30 September 2023 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 23:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@FatalFit can you give examples of where you've reviewed articles? I see a lot of redirects in your curation log but there's ,uch less to assess there than with an article. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:20, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Mostly I wanted to help out with the very large redirect backlog but I've also reviewed some disambiguation pages and some articles I've reviewed are Detroit Bus Station, Amasia (supercontinent), Augustana (Illinois) Vikings football, Sam Gellaitry, Basira Paigham and Glasgow Transit. FatalFit | ✉ | ✓  23:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Astrophobe

Hi! I'm requesting this right because I want to grow as an editor from just adding content to also contributing to areas where there's a clear need and a consistent backlog. I'll organize my request around explaining why I satisfy all the criteria at Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers#Guidelines_for_granting. 1) I've been registered and active for well over 90 days, and have made slightly over over 10k live edits to mainspace. 2) I would name "policy-compliant content editing" as the main way that I demonstrate competence under part 2: I've created 316 mainspace articles, which lands me in the top ~2600 or so Wikipedians by articles created. Only one has been deleted: it was the second article I ever tried to write, and it went to AfD because I didn't yet know the consensus around how to interpret "significant press coverage" in WP:NPOL point 2. My articles typically receive good content ratings, with about half assessed at C or higher by the relevant WikiProjects, and fewer than 2 dozen out of >300 assessed as stubs. I've also participated in 4 GAs. One of them became an FA and netted me a Four Award, while another entitled me to a half-million award. I also have participated at AfD over the years. 3) I make a serious effort to always be civil, especially with new editors, and perusing my talk page archives might be a good way to verify this. I've also recently been trying to participate more at the Teahouse. 4) I've certainly done some page moves in my time. I've also had learning experiences from doing it the wrong way, in particular when I mis-judged whether or not a move would be uncontroversial per Wikipedia:Requested_moves#When_not_to_use_this_page (you can find this example in the edit history of Michel Rivard). After I was corrected, I went back and carefully re-read the relevant guidelines, and it has now been several years since I did a move that turned out to be too bold. 5) I've never been blocked. 6) I have only ever edited Wikipedia as a volunteer, and I will only ever edit Wikipedia as a volunteer. Thanks for considering my request! Astrophobe (talk) 16:44, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done for a one-month trial; you should be fine if you've written an FA but I still wouldn't mind double-checking after a month. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:25, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:EytanMelech

I have been editing Wikipedia for around 6 years now, and have been more actively editing for the past year. I enjoy writing my own articles, as well as expanding upon articles from time-to-time, having made over 4,000 edits to Wikipedia and having created over 100 pages. However, I would love to help in the PageTriage by giving feedback and reviewing articles and helping clear out the backlog.

I have done similar review in a more "unofficial" way, I guess. I often go through the "Random article" button for long periods of time and see what feedback or constructive edits I can add or "needed" banner notices that I can contribute to help improve or increase the chance of improvement on an article.

Please consider me for the permissions of new page reviewer. Thank you for your time, EytanMelech (talk) 17:44, 26 September 2023 (UTC) EytanMelech (talk) 17:44, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done for a one-month trial. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:36, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:JayTee32

I have created 5 articles and been a Wikipedia user for 4 years now. I find the permission would allow me to contribute to eliminating the backlog of new articles and contribute more to AfC, through which I created the article that led to my first GA. JayTee⛈️ 19:17, 26 September 2023 (UTC) JayTee⛈️ 19:17, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done for a one-month trial. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:49, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Deauthorized

I figure I'll give this request a shot and see how it does. I've been patrolling the new pages feed for a while now, improving or tagging articles as needed. I think I have a good grasp on notability now, and would like to participate in the upcoming NPP backlog drive. I'm requesting a trial period for that duration, if that's alright. Deauthorized. (talk) 13:55, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done for a one-month trial. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:51, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Alpha3031

I've recently started participating again at AfC and AfD again in the past few months and I figured I can handle the more demanding workload. By my own estimate, in a month I probably won't review much more than a dozen, perhaps a score, but I thought I'd throw my hat in anyway. Alpha3031 (t • c) 13:12, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:NotAGenious

With the increasing backlog (although drive is coming), some help probably wouldn't hurt. I've been working at counter-vandalism, help venues, dispute resolution, speedy deletion (some of those) and a bit at AFD and removing copyvios, and currently writing a few articles. I've went through all the instructions for the Curation Tool, the new page feed, the acceptance criteria and other guidance. I've understood everything, though if I'm unsure, I'll rather ask for help or leave it in the queue rather than review it myself. NotAGenious (talk) 11:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has 409 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 12:00, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cyberwolf434344

I have been working in csds for a while now and i want to contribute to the drive ~~~~ •Cyberwolf• 18:03, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. As far as I can see, you've only written one article and haven't participated in any AfDs. A lot of your contributions have been removing content from articles with the summary "spam clean up", which isn't accurate much of the time; for example, here, you removed a section that was clearly not spam - instead of removing it, you could've converted the external links into references. Also, this isn't the kind of attitude I look for in a reviewer. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 13:19, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Voorts

I've been doing AFC for three months, have four GAs (one of which I hope is about to pass FAC), and have reviewed several GANs and FACs. I'm hoping to help out at NPP as well. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:01, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 13:23, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Oronsay

I am aware that there is a large backlog of articles awaiting review and would like to help reduce that number. I have mainly created articles about women, but also list articles for awards, years in Australian literature and Australian honours. I am happy if you choose to grant me temporary permission that can be reviewed later. Oronsay (talk) 02:25, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 13:25, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:GraziePrego

Would love to be involved in this process- I have made many mainspace content edits and participated in AFD. GraziePrego (talk) 03:24, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/New_page_reviewer&oldid=1177919899"