Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Swarm (talk | contribs) at 15:56, 4 July 2023 (→‎User:Gug01: done (using userRightsManager)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Autopatrolled

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Shortcuts
Please read Wikipedia:Autopatrolled before requesting or nominating another user for this right. Applicants are unlikely to be granted this right if they have created fewer than 25 new articles on English Wikipedia, excluding redirects and disambiguation pages. Note that this right will not help you create or patrol articles.

User:Engineerchange

Following request from @Raydann: on my talk page, I'm requesting autopatrolled rights. In the last couple years, I've made a lot of pages of mostly politicians in the Washington, D.C., Maryland, Virginia areas and given the volume of the pages that I've made, I'd probably be less of a burden on the patrolling process if I was given these rights. Cheers, --Engineerchange (talk) 13:01, 2 July 2023 (UTC) Engineerchange (talk) 13:01, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Endorse I have seen many non-problematic articles created by this user articles while NPPing Josey Wales Parley 21:45, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, thanks for putting yourself forward. – Joe (talk) 10:28, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:MaxnaCarta

Never had an issue with being patrolled. None of my 30+ articles have ever been deleted (or nominated/tagged for deletion), and I have 4 GAs. I am requesting it now because there is a backlog and some of my recent articles haven't gone live because of this. I've got a few more in the pipeline and I'd prefer not to clog up the queue further. Hoping I can receive this perm. Cheers. — MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 23:49, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, thanks. – Joe (talk) 10:30, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Twinkle1990

Was autopatrolled couple of months before, and removed because I have declined some AfC drafts as probationary reviewers. My AfC reviews has nothing to do with the right of Autopatrolled as I won't be AfC reviewer again. Since removed from from AfC reviewer, no point to remove me as autopatrolled as my created articles never got any messed or deleted by AfD. Till date I have created 35+ articles with well understanding of secondary, 3 reliable sources as per realiabile sourcing and none is deleted and whichever is AfDed, survived with WP:SNOW. Twinkle1990 (talk) 12:44, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled was removed in response to this ANI thread. Courtesy ping @Star Mississippi: – Joe (talk) 12:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Star Mississippi Since my AfC reviewers right is revoked, and I am no longer a reviewer, my autropatrolled right is presumed not to damage Wikipedia by my page creations and the page modifications. Twinkle1990 (talk) 13:11, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not familiar with the specific requirements of autopatrolled, but my experience with @Twinkle1990's edits at the AfC threads, in the AfD that preceeded the ANI and related is they're not familiar enough with that constitutes a mainspace ready subject/article. I believe their own creations would benefit from extra eyes and therefore autopatrolled would not be a good idea. No objection if I'm overruled, this is just my opinion. Star Mississippi 15:42, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 12:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Star Mississippi and @Joe Roe, can you please check this and why this? I have done some mistakes, but not meted to damage Wikipedia. Twinkle1990 (talk) 13:20, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You clearly can’t understand the notability policies, and therefore your articles should still be going through a review from new pages review. It’s not that you intended to damage Wikipedia, just you shouldn’t be autopatrolled as your articles need a second review. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 16:10, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done This editor's autopatrol was removed during an ANI three weeks ago. Controversial editor with recent controversy. It appears that the community does not currently trust this editor with sensitive permissions. It will take time, a good attitude when receiving feedback, and problem-free editing to rebuild that trust. This isn't a "never", but you have some things to work on. Thank you for applying and happy editing. –Novem Linguae (talk) 20:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gug01

Requesting autopatrolled rights following a request from @Raydann: on my talk page. I've created hundreds of clean articles and have a GA. I'm requesting to avoid creating a backlog for other Wikipedia editors. Gug01 (talk) 02:28, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done ~Swarm~ {sting} 15:56, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Autopatrolled&oldid=1163388196"