Talk:List of Victorian Government infrastructure plans, proposals and studies

Australia: Victoria List‑class Low‑importance

	Australia portal List of Victorian Government infrastructure plans, proposals and studies is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Requested move 9 January 2023

The request to rename this article to List of Victorian Government infrastructure plans, proposals and studies has been carried out.

If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag.

List of Victoria Government Infrastructure Plans, Proposals and Studies → List of Victorian Government infrastructure plans, proposals and studies – This is not a proper noun and thus should not be capitalised with the exception of Victoria Government. I have also changed "Victoria Government" to "Victorian Government" as it seems to be better that way according to the lead of Victoria State Government. Steelkamp (talk) 04:55, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support- I agree with these reasons. HoHo3143 (talk) 05:04, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree ThylacineHunter (talk) 05:04, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support- Capatilization is not appropriate for words proposal and studies here NotOrrio (talk) 05:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Also the article needs a good going over for its over-capitalization of lots of things esp. in headings. Dicklyon (talk) 03:49, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Dicklyon: No it doesn't? The headings' capitalisation looks fine to me. Granted, there are a few other capitalisation issues, such as "PRINCIPLE 1", "PRINCIPLE 2", etc, but not in the headings. Steelkamp (talk) 04:01, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see support in the cited sourced for the headings ending in "Plan" and "Report" being proper names. If it's there, fine; I haven't looked too hard yet. Dicklyon (talk) 04:06, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]