Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes
Appearance
VfD etiquette
- VfD voters are expected to be familiar with the policies of Civility, Wikiquette and Don't bite the newbies.
- Don't make personal attacks against people who disagree with you.
- Don't add tally boxes to the deletion page.
- Repeat offenders of the above may be subject to temporary blocking.
Words
- COPYVIO
- Dictionary definitions
- If the definition can be expanded to a viable encyclopedia article, add a {{stub}} tag.
- If not, it belongs in Wiktionary; add a {{move to wiktionary}} tag.
- Foreign language texts need translation; add a {{notenglish}} tag.
- Guidebooks and how-to texts belong in Wikisource; add a <{{move to wikisource}} tag.
- Recipes belong in Wikisource; add a {{move to wikisource}} tag.
- Neologisms are notable if they have been widely used in several parts of the world. The google test tends to be very appropriate here.
- Slang
- Quotes belong in wikiquote
- Lists of words (e.g. Latin words in the English language) belong in wiktionary
- Gibberish
- Test pages (i.e. "Hello, does this edit thingy work?") should be deleted, add a {{testpage}} tag.
- Inherently POV articles (i.e. "Best songs ever") should be deleted.
- Sometimes, a variant page with an objective criterium (i.e. "Songs that have been #1 hits") can be created.
- Attack pages (i.e. "John Doe is a moron!")
- Often these were good articles that were vandalized; check the 'history' tab
- If not, they can be speedily deleted; add a {{db|attack page}} tag.
Original research
An article qualifies as original research if at least one of the following is true:
- It introduces a theory or method of solution
- It introduces original ideas
- It defines new terms
- It provides new definitions of old terms
- It purports to refute another idea
- It introduces neologisms
The following are not original research:
- Listing well-known claims which have few (or possibly just one or two) adherents (e.g. Shakespearean authorship theories or Linus Pauling's advocacy of Vitamin C)
- Listing notable claims which contradict established axioms, theories, or norms (e.g morphogenetic fields or conspiracy theories)
- Including research that fails to provide the possibility of reproducible results (e.g. theological or philosophical theories)
- Citing viewpoints that violate Occam's Razor, the principle of choosing the simplest explanation when multiple viable explanations are possible (e.g. Phlogiston, Aether)
- The ideas have been accepted for publication in a peer reviewed journal
- The ideas have become newsworthy: they have been repeatedly and independently reported in newspapers or news stories (such as the cold fusion story).
Remarks on notability
Cities and villages
- Bars, pubs, cafes and hotels should be listed on WikiTravel
- Cities themselves are notable, regardless of size
- Malls are not generally notable
- Streets are not generally notable
- Suburbs should generally be listed under the city they're part of
- Touristic information should be listed on WikiTravel
- The tag {{city-stub}} is obsolete, please don't use it.
Companies
- Blatant advertising pages are subject to deletion
- Products that have been planned but not created yet, are not generally notable
- Small companies are not generally notable
Education
- High schools are the subject of much debate, there currently exists no consensus of them
- However, a well-written non-stub school article has a higher likelihood of being kept
- High school teachers, clubs, classrooms or lessons are not notable.
- Classes are not notable (but they are usually about a notable subject, e.g. psychology)
- Professors are notable if they have made significant contribution to one or more books (not just papers)
- Students are not notable
Entertainment
- Celebrities are notable
- Radio stations are notable if broadcast at least regionally (i.e. not limited to a single city)
- Reality show contestants should generally be listed in the article on the show
- TV stations are notable if broadcast at least regionally (i.e. not limited to a single city)
Geography
- Cities and villages are notable
- Highways and interstates are notable
- Highway exits should be listed in an article on a highway, not on a separate article
- Landmarks (i.e. lakes, mountains, etc.) are notable
- Using the tag {{geo-stub}} is discouraged, please use more specific tags (e.g. US-geo-stub).
Internet
- Communities, message boards and blogs are generally not notable
- Programming languages are notable if somewhat widely used; Google is a reasonable test
- Webcomics are notable if they have had frequent (weekly or better) updates for over a year
Literarture
- Authors and writers are notable if they have released a book (other than through vanity press)
- Books are notable if well-known, and should be listed under the author if not
- Characters from books
- Major characters are notable if well-known, and should be listed under the book if not
- Minor characters should be listed under the book, or in an article that lists and describes minor characters
- Fanfic is not notable
- Literary texts themselves belong in WikiSource, but tend to be copyright violations
- Locations in books follow the same guidelines as characters, see above
- Poems belong in WikiSource, but are sometimes copyright violations
Music
- Albums are notable, but please provide the name of the band, and more info than a mere tracklist
- Bands and musicians are notable if they have released an album on a notable label
- Band members should generally be listed under the band, rather than in a separate article
- Lyrics belong in WikiSource, but tend to be copyright violations
- Radio stations are notable if broadcast at least regionally (i.e. not limited to a single city)
- Songs are not generally notable, and should be listed under album or artist as appropriate
- Shows and tours of bands should be listed in the band article, not in a separate article