Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case
Requests for arbitration
- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
| Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inappropriate censorship of contribution to page entitled "God" | 24 January 2022 | 0/0/0 |
| Request name | Motions | Case | Posted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amendment request: Definition of the "area of conflict" Clause 4 (b) | Motion | (orig. case) | 26 July 2024 |
| Amendment request: Palestine-Israel articles (AE referral) | Motion | (orig. case) | 17 August 2024 |
| Clarification request: Conduct in deletion-related editing | none | (orig. case) | 8 September 2024 |
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. This page is for statements, not discussion.
|
Inappropriate censorship of contribution to page entitled "God"
Initiated by Djhbrown (talk) at 22:49, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Involved parties
- Djhbrown (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
- MrOllie (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- [diff of notification MrOllie]
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
Statement by Djhbrown
a page entitled "God" should not be permitted to be sequestered by a special interest group that will censor any objective, testable, scientific information as to who invented the concept of "God" and when and where and why, which is what my contribution provided, although i would be the first to acknowledge that it could be improved upon. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=God&type=revision&diff=1067723405&oldid=1067722697 A possible solution could be for the entire page to be deleted or to be retitled "The Christianity Concept of God" which more accurately reflects its (highly censored) content and could justifiably exclude any non-partisan objectivity, archaeology or history.
@FyzixFighter: {{subst:arbcom notice|Inappropriate censorship of contribution to page entitled "God"}}. Djhbrown (talk) 22:49, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
@MrOllie: {{subst:arbcom notice|Inappropriate censorship of contribution to page entitled "God"}}. Djhbrown (talk) 22:49, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
{{subst:arbcom notice|Inappropriate censorship of contribution to page entitled "God"}}.
-->
Statement by MrOllie
Statement by TransporterMan
Garden-variety content dispute. No dispute resolution, not even content DR, attempted. Reject. — TransporterMan (TALK) 23:06, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Statement by {Non-party}
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
Inappropriate censorship of contribution to page entitled "God": Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
Inappropriate censorship of contribution to page entitled "God": Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>
Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)