User talk:Luxofluxo

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pfaffenthal-Kirchberg railway station has been accepted

Pfaffenthal-Kirchberg railway station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 13:14, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Luxofluxo, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Luxofluxo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Assuming good faith

In this edit at Talk:Czech Republic#Requested move 25 July 2021 on 7 August you questioned my good faith at the article talk page discussion. And then you followed up a couple days later and did the same thing again in these edits by responding to a comment by Kahastok by casting aspersions on their motives in the discussion, whereas I found them to be responding to the content and applying guidelines and policy correctly. (You later removed the worst of it, so bravo for that, but that still leaves the bulk of it in place.) On the Talk page, please stick to making your points based on the content of the article and how best to improve it, not on your assessment of other editors' motives in the discussion. If you find that editors are engaging in activity on the Talk page that is contrary to behavioral guidelines, it's appropriate to raise the issue on their Talk page, but please leave such comments out of the Talk page discussion, which should be confined to article content and how to improve it. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 08:35, 9 August 2021 (UTC)