Jump to content

User talk:Nnadigoodluck/archives/11

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Celestina007 (talk | contribs) at 23:30, 14 April 2021 (→‎Drafts: Wording). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Data verification

Hi again. I am not sure why some other user did this last night. I do not know how the NCDC did their updates in the early days of the pandemic. Is that change supported by a reliable source? LSGH (talk) (contributions) 01:10, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

LSGH, Yes, they're probably right, the data was incorrect. See my edits on that day here and here. Also see the situation report from the NCDC official website on that day. Best, —Nnadigoodluck 02:29, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
How about this? I can say that those are not the numbers that were shown when I updated the chart. The user has been actively involved in this topic area for almost one month already. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 10:41, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
LSGH, Surprisingly, they're right again. See this reliable source and this one. Best, —Nnadigoodluck 10:51, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Did they publish their numbers more than once on those days? This was superseded by this, but this superseded a previous update that I could not find. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 01:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
LSGH, This is the first update from 16 February 2021 you couldn't find. So, from what I could see from my investigation, the NCDC updated twice on those days, adding numbers of Lagos State they couldn't add or missed in their initial report, so all good here. Best, —Nnadigoodluck 07:05, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Before this, I had not been aware of such instances of late reporting. I usually look at the source just once a day, and I had assumed that there was no change from the previous day's data. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 00:59, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

THANK YOU TOO Siyanco (talk) 08:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft pages

Nnadi please can you check and undraft this two page I create as draft, Abdullahi Gana, Mohammed Idris.

Thank you

New Page Reviews
Thank you for reviewing my new articles. Have this nicely crafted mound of Jollof and Dodo Halo as a sign of my appreciation. The Sokks💕 (talk) 13:18, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts

An addendum to this would be, technically there’s an option to “accept” but if you attempt to “accept” it, it doesn’t work and a notice of “admin protected” pops up. Celestina007 (talk) 22:46, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Celestina007, it's not really about the interface allowing you to accept the draft of a title protected from creation, it's to first show your readiness to accept the draft and a willing administrator will remove the page's protection, thus allowing you to move it to the article space. That should be standard practice. —Nnadigoodluck 23:06, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate your input, but like I stated you simply cannot accept the article even if you attempted to, a notice is auto generated mandating that the article name be first unprotected, at least as far as accepting drafts at AFC that’s the standard practice. Oh? I get your POV now, you think it should be the individual attempting to accept the draft that the onus depends on? if that was your POV then it’s a matter of choice, you may or may not assume that responsibility as afc reviewers aren’t mandated to, infact it is behoove of the article creator to do so anyway, like I earlier stated your input is very much appreciated.Celestina007 (talk) 23:22, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]