Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Anarchyte (talk | contribs) at 06:21, 27 March 2021 (→‎User:Crossroads: done (using userRightsManager)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Pending changes reviewer

The reason why I'm requesting is because it can get annoying for IP users trying to add a edit that is unreasonable. kpgamingz (rant me🐦) 00:26, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Not a valid reason for requesting, doesn't indicate that you understand what you're requesting or have a reason for requesting it. Also way too many ongoing issues resulting in warnings and other notifications. ~Swarm~ {sting} 02:16, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I like to give pending changes review and I have already read about pending changes review, Thanks. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 11:14, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict)I think even rollback is too much for you at this level of experience and English grammar. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 12:19, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree that rollback is "too much" for Dam222, they are proven to be capable at it. Regarding the grammar, they are improving ever since I first seen them join. MarioJump83! 12:24, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I don't really think you need this right, Dam222, because you haven't really used it a lot during your trial. ~ 🌀 SCS CORONA 🌀 16:10, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I used it and I need it, @Super Cyclonic Storm Corona: can you tell me how much you have used this right? Dam222 🌋 (talk) 18:06, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Dam222: Like, around 15 times. I haven't used it a lot lately, but I have used it a good amount of times since getting it granted (28 January 2021). ~ 🌀 SCS CORONA 🌀 18:09, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am ready with all the challenges, I am ready for the right. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 18:21, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done ~Swarm~ {sting} 02:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This user right is consistent with the type of editing I would like to help out with. I have applied for, and been granted rollback permissions to confirm I understand vandalism. I'm familiar with the policies on content and copyrights. I have also read, and understand Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, as well as Wikipedia:Tips for pending changes reviewers. Thank you for your consideration. Huggums537 (talk) 18:32, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done ~Swarm~ {sting} 02:26, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have been editing Wikipedia for just over a year now and have made over 5,000 edits. I would like pending changes reviewer so I can accept pending changes on articles I work with, such as Tornadoes of 2021. 🌀HurricaneCovid🌀 (contribs) 19:48, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done ~Swarm~ {sting} 03:14, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I see pending changes in my watchlist (or on recent changes) that I'd like to accept sometimes. Plus, I like doing things like helping to clear the edit request backlog so I imagine I'd enjoy helping to clear the pending changes backlog too when I have the time. Volteer1 (talk) 13:24, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done ~Swarm~ {sting} 03:15, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am a quite active editor, and I have extended confirmed rights, and rollback. I use RedWarn and Twinkle to revert vandalism. Anyway introduction over! I would like this tool so that I can swiftly revert changes on pending revisions pages, without having to waste any time before looking at recent changes again. Additionally, I would like to clear the high-level pending changes backlog. Thanks, have a nice day! EGL1234 05:15, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done ~Swarm~ {sting} 03:15, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! My reason for requesting pending changing reviewer rights is because I want to be able to check other users edits, allow good-faith edits to pass and revert vandalism edits on pending changes protection pages. I revert any vandalism I see and warn users about hoaxes they created. Next, I am familiar with the pending changes reviewer policy and other policies and guidelines. I also want to help people learn as they grow on Wikipedia, like how I am learning. Even though I haven't have made that many mainspace edits, I hope to do so in the following weeks, months and years I edit. I also hope to accept and decline some of the edits waiting in the log and reduce the work, time and effort for other pending changes reviewers and admins. Thanks for reading, Cupcake547 (talk) 23:31, 24 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]
 Automated comment This user has had an account for 7 days and has 83 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 01:50, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Brand new user, more time needed to establish trust ~Swarm~ {sting} 03:15, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As an extended confirmed user with substantial editing experience, particularly on political-related issues, I think I would be a good candidate. Specifically, I would be a valuable asset reviewing pages of notable government/political leaders. Cliffmore (talk) 23:49, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Not enough counter-vandalism experience and effectively no edit summary usage. Anarchyte (talkwork) 06:14, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I already help out with similar tasks, so I think I would be perfect for this right. Lomrjyo (talk) 01:41, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have over 10,000 edits, edit regularly, and have never been blocked. This permission will be very useful for me and my watchlist, which seems to have many PC protected pages. I have read the required guideline pages. Crossroads -talk- 06:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Anarchyte (talkwork) 06:21, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I mainly work in weather-related articles such as Tornadoes of 2021 and have done so for ten years. Since this work often involves current events, I would like to be a pending changes reviewer so that I may help prevent pending changes from delaying updates. Aside from vandalism, edits to these articles from new or unregistered users are most often subject to scrutiny because they are unsourced or contain original research. TornadoLGS (talk) 17:32, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]