Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case
Requests for arbitration
- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
| Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kiss from the Past disputed article notability | 24 January 2021 | 0/2/0 |
| Request name | Motions | Case | Posted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amendment request: Article titles and capitalisation | none | (orig. case) | 7 June 2024 |
| Clarification request: mentioning the name of off-wiki threads | none | none | 4 June 2024 |
| Amendment request: India-Pakistan | none | (orig. case) | 7 June 2024 |
| Clarification request: Contentious topics restrictions | none | none | 10 June 2024 |
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. This page is for statements, not discussion.
|
Kiss from the Past disputed article notability
Initiated by Psywave (talk) at 13:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Involved parties
- Psywave (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
- Richard3120 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Onel5969 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- [diff of notification Richard3120]
- [diff of notification Onel5969]
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
- Link 1
- Link 2
Statement by Psywave
The Kiss from the Past album is a notable component of the artist Tiesto's career, as it marked a footnote of the genre for which the artist was originally famous. This makes the album sufficiently notable in my view. The album's existence and its link to Tiesto, and the significance of it within his career - despite little commercial success - was appropriately referenced and valid. There has bene considerable disagreement between myself and Richard3120, although the latest reversion was by Onel5969, so they have been added as a party.
Statement by Richard3120
Statement by Onel5969
Statement by The Bushranger
Still having Requests/Case watchlisted after the Kurdistan thing- The OP might be interested in the dispute resolution noticeboard, which is thataway→. - The Bushranger One ping only 19:16, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Statement by {Non-party}
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
Kiss from the Past disputed article notability: Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
Kiss from the Past disputed article notability: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/2/0>
Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)
- Decline and possibly just remove this now; filer has not made any talk or user talk edits since 2018, and no effort has been made to go through dispute resolution. This is 100% a content dispute. Primefac (talk) 14:02, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- Obvious Decline Arbcom is not the place for notability discussions. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:12, 24 January 2021 (UTC)