Tetradecimal: Revision history

15 January 2017

• curprev 08:5608:56, 15 January 2017‎ Christian75 talk contribs‎ 90 bytes +17‎ →‎top: Adding redirect template using AWB undo

21 September 2016

• curprev 06:2306:23, 21 September 2016‎ Bearcat talk contribs‎ m 73 bytes −33‎ →‎top: don't tag redirects as uncategorized using AWB undo

11 July 2016

• curprev 15:3615:36, 11 July 2016‎ Davey2010 talk contribs‎ 106 bytes −3,818‎ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tetradecimal closed as redirect to List of numeral systems#Standard positional numeral systems undo

4 July 2016

• curprev 00:5200:52, 4 July 2016‎ Blackbombchu talk contribs‎ 3,924 bytes +405‎ Nominated for deletion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tetradecimal. (TW) undo
• curprev 00:5000:50, 4 July 2016‎ Blackbombchu talk contribs‎ 3,519 bytes +3,088‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 00:4700:47, 4 July 2016‎ Blackbombchu talk contribs‎ 431 bytes +341‎ Listed for discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 July 4#Tetradecimal. (TW) undo

12 February 2016

• curprev 02:2702:27, 12 February 2016‎ RileyBot talk contribs‎ m 90 bytes +17‎ Bot: Tagging redirect with Template:R to section) (Task 17 undo

25 February 2015

• curprev 22:4222:42, 25 February 2015‎ David Eppstein talk contribs‎ 73 bytes −3,446‎ I don't think this is independently notable — try redirecting it to the parent article undo

20 February 2015

• curprev 04:3504:35, 20 February 2015‎ Double sharp talk contribs‎ 3,519 bytes −161‎ →‎In popular culture: and has anyone remarked on this, unlike 6×9=42? I'm now imagining mentions of the Wonderland 4×5=12 (base 18), 4×6=13 (base 21)... undo

30 October 2014

• curprev 17:5617:56, 30 October 2014‎ 2620:0:102f:1001:44e9:3bb7:c094:9240 talk‎ 3,680 bytes +161‎ No edit summary undo

25 September 2014

• curprev 07:0707:07, 25 September 2014‎ 14.2.179.92 talk‎ 3,519 bytes 0‎ →‎Base 14 multiplication table undo

24 June 2014

• curprev 05:4205:42, 24 June 2014‎ Double sharp talk contribs‎ m 3,519 bytes −1‎ I apparently can't spell quaternary undo
• curprev 05:2705:27, 24 June 2014‎ Double sharp talk contribs‎ 3,520 bytes −50‎ I don't see any refs for the other claims undo
• curprev 05:2405:24, 24 June 2014‎ Double sharp talk contribs‎ 3,570 bytes +78‎ 21 = unvigesimal (pretty cool for numerical reasons), 25 = pentavigesimal (a very horrible base) undo
• curprev 05:2105:21, 24 June 2014‎ Double sharp talk contribs‎ m 3,492 bytes +1‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 05:2105:21, 24 June 2014‎ Double sharp talk contribs‎ 3,491 bytes −230‎ we only really need one example undo
• curprev 05:1405:14, 24 June 2014‎ Double sharp talk contribs‎ 3,721 bytes −56‎ it is no more difficult than understanding any integer base undo

9 June 2014

• curprev 09:3809:38, 9 June 2014‎ 101.175.217.166 talk‎ 3,777 bytes 0‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 09:3709:37, 9 June 2014‎ 101.175.217.166 talk‎ 3,777 bytes 0‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 03:2803:28, 9 June 2014‎ ClueBot NG talk contribs‎ m 3,777 bytes −42‎ Reverting possible vandalism by 124.187.136.210 to version by 2.25.131.166. False positive? Report it. Thanks, ClueBot NG. (1868873) (Bot) undo
• curprev 03:2803:28, 9 June 2014‎ 124.187.136.210 talk‎ 3,819 bytes +42‎ No edit summary undo

30 January 2014

• curprev 16:2416:24, 30 January 2014‎ 2.25.131.166 talk‎ 3,777 bytes −89‎ No they can't. If you know Latin, "quattuordecimal" is obviously related to "quattuordecim" = 14. If you don't know Latin, you won't know what "quattuordecimal" means anyway without looking it up. undo

19 November 2013

• curprev 06:5706:57, 19 November 2013‎ Dufo talk contribs‎ 3,866 bytes +1,992‎ Base 14 multiplication table undo

11 July 2013

• curprev 20:0320:03, 11 July 2013‎ Bcharles talk contribs‎ 1,874 bytes −37‎ added related detail; dropped irrelevant category undo

6 April 2013

• curprev 16:2616:26, 6 April 2013‎ Double sharp talk contribs‎ 1,911 bytes +108‎ No edit summary undo

11 December 2012

• curprev 11:2111:21, 11 December 2012‎ Yobot talk contribs‎ m 1,803 bytes −2‎ clean up, References after punctuation per WP:REFPUNC and WP:CITEFOOT using AWB (8792) undo

28 November 2012

• curprev 13:2913:29, 28 November 2012‎ Great force talk contribs‎ 1,805 bytes +1‎ →‎External links undo

27 November 2012

• curprev 09:4209:42, 27 November 2012‎ Great force talk contribs‎ 1,804 bytes +1‎ →‎Eternal links undo
• curprev 09:4009:40, 27 November 2012‎ Great force talk contribs‎ 1,803 bytes +117‎ No edit summary undo

26 September 2012

• curprev 18:3518:35, 26 September 2012‎ 207.210.134.83 talk‎ 1,686 bytes −5‎ No edit summary undo

14 July 2012

• curprev 21:3821:38, 14 July 2012‎ Thewikicontributor talk contribs‎ 1,691 bytes 0‎ No edit summary undo

22 March 2012

• curprev 21:5321:53, 22 March 2012‎ 217.137.173.243 talk‎ 1,691 bytes +341‎ have given a brief, more user friendly description of working with tetradecimal base systems. undo

3 November 2011

• curprev 22:0122:01, 3 November 2011‎ Jasper Deng talk contribs‎ 1,350 bytes −150‎ Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. There are many ways of understanding it. undo
• curprev 21:4221:42, 3 November 2011‎ Chasmorox talk contribs‎ m 1,500 bytes +39‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 21:4121:41, 3 November 2011‎ Chasmorox talk contribs‎ m 1,461 bytes +111‎ No edit summary undo

13 October 2010

• curprev 12:3612:36, 13 October 2010‎ Meco talk contribs‎ 1,350 bytes −69‎ removing sort key scheme for Category:Positional numeral systems that is not helpful undo

10 October 2010

• curprev 12:5712:57, 10 October 2010‎ Nø talk contribs‎ m 1,419 bytes +8‎ Mod comment for Positional numerl systems sort tag undo

23 December 2009

• curprev 03:2703:27, 23 December 2009‎ 4 talk contribs‎ 1,411 bytes −1‎ No edit summary undo

23 October 2009

• curprev 08:5608:56, 23 October 2009‎ Sligocki talk contribs‎ 1,412 bytes +33‎ No edit summary undo

18 July 2007

• curprev 06:3906:39, 18 July 2007‎ Dirac1933 talk contribs‎ m 1,379 bytes +4‎ No edit summary undo

26 May 2007

• curprev 21:4021:40, 26 May 2007‎ Uaxuctum~enwiki talk contribs‎ 1,375 bytes +27‎ No edit summary undo

24 April 2007

• curprev 06:0606:06, 24 April 2007‎ Alvestrand talk contribs‎ 1,348 bytes +263‎ Labels & links. Questionable use, but nice for completeness.. undo

16 April 2007

• curprev 15:3215:32, 16 April 2007‎ SmackBot talk contribs‎ m 1,085 bytes +5‎ Date/fix the maintenance tags &/or gen fixes undo

4 April 2007

• curprev 08:5308:53, 4 April 2007‎ Alaibot talk contribs‎ m 1,080 bytes +29‎ Robot: tagging as uncategorised undo

9 March 2007

• curprev 15:3715:37, 9 March 2007‎ Date20070309 talk contribs‎ 1,051 bytes +1,051‎ ←Created page with 'The tetradecimal (base-14) positional notation system is based on the number fourteen. Comparatively, the decimal system is based on the number ten, the hexadecimal...'