Jump to content

Hoeffding's inequality: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

11 May 2024

28 January 2024

5 January 2024

8 November 2023

27 October 2023

11 October 2023

  • curprev 20:5120:51, 11 October 2023Limit-theorem talk contribs 11,949 bytes +2 Incorrect. See the reference original paper or use talk page. Plus the preceding equation matches for [0,1]. Undid revision 1179667354 by 77.65.88.237 (talk) undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 16:5216:52, 11 October 202377.65.88.237 talk 11,947 bytes −2 →‎Example: the previous bounds do not go to 0 as n goes to infinity, which is stupid because that would mean that this version of Hoeffdings inequality is so weak that it doesn't even imply the strong law of large numbers. I changed division by n into multiplication by n based on the version of Hoeffdings inequality that I saw cited in 'a hot spot proof of the generalized wall theorem' by Vitaly Bergelson and Joseph Vandehey. There is also a high probability that this page has more errors. undo Tag: Reverted

12 September 2023

2 September 2023

8 August 2023

2 July 2023

20 May 2023

2 September 2022

15 August 2022

24 June 2022

15 April 2022

  • curprev 19:1919:19, 15 April 2022Malparti talk contribsm 9,838 bytes −484 Chernoff bounds do not apply only to Bernoulli variables -- see, e.g, the relevant article here on Wikipedia. The reference Vershynin (2018) was incorrectly interpreted, and Nowak (2009) was wrong so I've removed it. undo

10 February 2022

3 February 2022

2 February 2022

8 January 2022

23 December 2021

19 November 2021

6 August 2021

18 June 2021

8 June 2021

10 April 2021

19 November 2020

17 November 2020

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)