Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mississippi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article alerts exist for this project — click "show" to view
(Deletion discussions, peer reviews, featured article candidates, and other alerts)

Did you know

Articles for deletion

Categories for discussion

  • 14 Nov 2024Category:Mississippi Independents (talk · edit · hist) CfDed by Jjamesryan (t · c) was closed; see discussion

Featured article candidates

A-Class review

Good article nominees

Articles to be split

Articles for creation


New articles exist for this project — click "show" to view
(These are new Wikipedia articles which a bot has identified as possibly being within the scope of this project.)
This list was generated from these rules. Questions and feedback are always welcome! The search is being run daily with the most recent ~14 days of results. Note: Some articles may not be relevant to this project.

Rules | Match log | Results page (for watching) | Last updated: 2024-11-24 21:30 (UTC)

Note: The list display can now be customized by each user. See List display personalization for details.
















User script to detect unreliable sources

[edit]

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

  • John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jefferson Davis FAR

[edit]

I have nominated Jefferson Davis for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Guerillero Parlez Moi 13:15, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Article Save Award for Jefferson Davis

[edit]

There is a Featured Article Save Award nomination at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/Jefferson Davis/archive1. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts for missing Mississippi Supreme Court justices

[edit]

Drafts have been created for the following missing Mississippi Supreme Court justices under Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/United States judges and justices#Mississippi. Any help in getting these completed and promoted to mainspace would be be appreciated:

BD2412 T 02:56, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Wikipedia (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {CX}) 06:36, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I started a draft on this fellow a while back and would be happy to have some help with it. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:18, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]