Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/MilHistBot 6: Difference between revisions
Created |
|||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
<!-- List full and complete function details here. Please be precise and explicit, describing all changes the bot would make, including those "bundled" with bot frameworks like AWB or pywikipedia genfixes. Bots cannot be approved for open-ended tasks, so ensure the details cover all cases. Consider making several BRFAs for tasks with large independent changes. Vague or incomplete details can delay the BRFA process. Straight-forward details and examples will speed up the approval. If you need to modify these details after a discussion starts, it is recommended that you use del tags – <del></del> – to remove text and ins tags – <ins></ins> – for additions (this preserves coherence of the discussion), or show/hide boxes as you see fit. --> |
<!-- List full and complete function details here. Please be precise and explicit, describing all changes the bot would make, including those "bundled" with bot frameworks like AWB or pywikipedia genfixes. Bots cannot be approved for open-ended tasks, so ensure the details cover all cases. Consider making several BRFAs for tasks with large independent changes. Vague or incomplete details can delay the BRFA process. Straight-forward details and examples will speed up the approval. If you need to modify these details after a discussion starts, it is recommended that you use del tags – <del></del> – to remove text and ins tags – <ins></ins> – for additions (this preserves coherence of the discussion), or show/hide boxes as you see fit. --> |
||
'''Function details:''' The MilHistBot is now routinely assessing MilHist articles with missing or incomplete assessments. |
'''Function details:''' The MilHistBot is now routinely assessing MilHist articles with missing or incomplete assessments. The coordinators decided that those rated B class should be assessed manually. Accordingly, a run has been created to report these. There are estimated to be between 10 and 20 per month. The run makes a single edit, listing the articles that have been rated B class. A sample can be seen at [[User talk:Hawkeye7#AutoCheck report for December]] (The Bot now signs these.) |
||
: [[User:Hawkeye7|<span style="color:#800082">Hawkeye7</span>]] [[User_talk:Hawkeye7|<span style="font-size:80%">(discuss)</span>]] 01:54, 18 December 2019 (UTC) |
: [[User:Hawkeye7|<span style="color:#800082">Hawkeye7</span>]] [[User_talk:Hawkeye7|<span style="font-size:80%">(discuss)</span>]] 01:54, 18 December 2019 (UTC) |
||
===Discussion=== |
===Discussion=== |
||
Revision as of 01:56, 18 December 2019
Operator: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 01:54, Wednesday, December 18, 2019 (UTC)
Function overview: Report on which articles have been graded as B class over the last month.
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Manual
Programming language(s): C#
Source code available: User:MilHistBot/AutoReport.cs
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators#Bot assessments
Edit period(s): Monthly
Estimated number of pages affected: 1
Namespace(s): Wikipedia talk
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: The MilHistBot is now routinely assessing MilHist articles with missing or incomplete assessments. The coordinators decided that those rated B class should be assessed manually. Accordingly, a run has been created to report these. There are estimated to be between 10 and 20 per month. The run makes a single edit, listing the articles that have been rated B class. A sample can be seen at User talk:Hawkeye7#AutoCheck report for December (The Bot now signs these.)