Miracle in Soho: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
add reference
add reference
Line 55: Line 55:
* [[Colin Douglas (actor)|Colin Douglas]] ... Supervisor
* [[Colin Douglas (actor)|Colin Douglas]] ... Supervisor
==Production==
==Production==
Emeric Pressburger wrote the script in 1934. It was originally called ''The Miracle in St Anthony's Lane''.
Emeric Pressburger wrote the script in Paris in 1934 for director [[Kurt Gerron]]. It was originally called ''The Miracle in St Anthony's Lane'' and was about German exiles in Paris. The film came close to being made in the 1930s, being optioned several times in France.<ref>MacDonald p 304</ref>


Pressburger went into a highly acclaimed partnership with Michael Powell for nearly twenty years. They made ''Battle of the River Plate'' for the Rank Organisation which was expected to be a big success; Pressburger wanted the team to follow it up with three movies: ''Ill Met By Moonlight'', ''Miracle in St Anthony's Lane'' and ''Cassie''. They made ''Ill Met By Moonlight'' but fought do much during the process that the partnership terminated.<ref>Powell p 304</ref>
Pressburger went into a highly acclaimed partnership with Michael Powell for nearly twenty years. Powell says Pressburger was always interested in ''Miracle'' saying "it had been optioned in Berlin, in Paris, and in London, and had even made one flight to Hollywood for six months before returning to its author, minus a few feathers." Powell said Pressburger tried to tell him the project "but I wasn't having any. The story was loaded with Hungarian charm but it had no substance. It was a tender trap, a good fairy, a marshmellow, the sort of film that attracts and sucks in top talent like [[William Wyler]], Margaret Sullavan and then leaves them floundering in the gooey mess."<ref>Powell p 220</ref> He also called it "emasculated de Maupassant" which "shows its age by the delicate way it steps around sexual relationships" and "the people in the lane are the usual ethnic stereotypes.<ref>Powell p 281</ref>


In 1945 Pressburger announced he would director produce the film independently of Powell but it was not made after Pressburger could not secure one of the three stars he wanted (Michael Redgrave, Robert Donat, Laurence Olivier).<ref>MacDonald p 264</ref>
''Battle of the River Plate'' was a financial and critical success. Pressburger signed a contract with Rank to write and produce ''Miracle'' for £11,000. Sir John Davis, head of Rank, allowed Pressburger to select a director from a short list of three young TV directors; Pressburger picked Julian Aymes.<ref>Macdonald p 365</ref>


In June 1954 Pressburger announced he and Powell would make ''Miracle'' as part of a slate of three films, the others being an adaptation of ''Die Fladermaus'' and a version of The Battle of the River Plate. Pressburger called ''Miracle'' "a love story - a sort of up-date of ''[[Seventh Heaven (1927 film)|Seventh Heaven]]'' set in London's Soho district."<ref>BY WAY OF REPORT: Graf Spee Story to Be Filmed -- Other Items BY A. H. WEILER. New York Times 20 June 1954: X5.</ref>
⚫
Aymes had been working mostly in TV but moved to features to make ''Hill in Korea'' and ''Miracle in Soho''. According to Aymes' obituary, "This was not a particularly happy time for Julian Amyes. He felt that the film business did not really suit him and he seemed to have to spend far too much of his time reading and rejecting bad scripts. For him the atmosphere of television was an altogether happier one where he felt he had much greater creative freedom."<ref>Julian Amyes;Obituary

The Times; London (UK) [London (UK)]27 Apr 1992. </ref>
They made ''Battle of the River Plate'' for the Rank Organisation. British Lion wanted to make ''Miracle'' with Stanley Baker and Diane Cilento.<ref>MacDonald p 358</ref> Pressburger wanted the team to follow it up with three movies: ''Ill Met By Moonlight'', ''Miracle in St Anthony's Lane'' and ''Cassie''. They made ''Ill Met By Moonlight'' but fought do much during the process that the partnership terminated.<ref>Powell p 304</ref>

''Battle of the River Plate'' was a financial and critical success. Sir John Davis of Rank agreed to finance ''Miracle'' (which became ''Miracle in Soho'') with Pressburger writing and producing for a fee of £11,000. Pressburger did not want to direct as he felt he was too close to the story (he had directed once before and not liked it). Sir John Davis, head of Rank, allowed Pressburger to select a director from a short list of three young TV directors.<ref>Macdonald p 365</ref> Powell said he felt Davis was "maneuvering Eric into a position he could not defend" and suggested that Pressburger ask a more experienced director like David Lean or Carol Reed, or [[Jack Cardiff]], who had been cinematographer on several Powell-Pressburger movies. However Pressburger picked the TV director Julian Aymes. Powell said Aymes "couldn't direct traffic".<ref>Powell p 415</ref>

⚫
Aymes had been working mostly in TV but moved to features to make ''Hill in Korea'' and ''Miracle in Soho''. According to Aymes' obituary, "This was not a particularly happy time for Julian Amyes. He felt that the film business did not really suit him and he seemed to have to spend far too much of his time reading and rejecting bad scripts. For him the atmosphere of television was an altogether happier one where he felt he had much greater creative freedom."<ref>Julian Amyes;Obituary The Times; London (UK) [London (UK)]27 Apr 1992. </ref>


Pressburger decided to make the movie entirely in the studio. He hired Carmen Dillon to do the art direction; Dillon had worked on Laurence Olivier's films of ''Henry V'' and ''Richard III''' and the producer wanted some of her theatricality.<ref>Macdonald p 366</ref>
Pressburger decided to make the movie entirely in the studio. He hired Carmen Dillon to do the art direction; Dillon had worked on Laurence Olivier's films of ''Henry V'' and ''Richard III''' and the producer wanted some of her theatricality.<ref>Macdonald p 366</ref>
Line 84: Line 89:


In a contemporary review, ''What's On in London'' called the film a "sentimental little fairy story...Peter Illing, as Papa, brings this coloured celluloid confection to life every time he comes on the screen, and Cyril Cusack, as the Salvationist postman, is very good, too. Of course, this isn't really Soho at all, but I don't suppose that's going to worry anyone except a few fussy Sohoians";<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.powell-pressburger.org/Reviews/57_Miracle/WhatsOn.html|title=Contemporary Review - What's On in London|publisher=}}</ref> while more recently, the ''[[Radio Times]]'' wrote, "Pressburger's script aims for the sort of semi-documentary tone that had become fashionable at the time, but this romance...needed a little local colour to buck it up, not grey sociological pronouncements. Christopher Challis's grim images of Soho have a certain historical value, but, amid a plethora of dodgy accents, neither John Gregson nor Belinda Lee even comes close to convincing";<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.radiotimes.com/film/hr6mh/miracle-in-soho|title=Miracle in Soho - Film from RadioTimes|publisher=}}</ref> and ''ithankyouarthur'' wrote, "With far grittier [[Kitchen sink realism|kitchen sinks]] just around the corner, the film looks back rather than forward but still has a cosy charm all of its own and the [[Magic realism|magic realist]] tone you would expect from its author and producer."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ithankyouarthur.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/emeric-alone-miracle-in-soho-1957.html|title=Emeric alone… Miracle in Soho (1957)|publisher=}}</ref>
In a contemporary review, ''What's On in London'' called the film a "sentimental little fairy story...Peter Illing, as Papa, brings this coloured celluloid confection to life every time he comes on the screen, and Cyril Cusack, as the Salvationist postman, is very good, too. Of course, this isn't really Soho at all, but I don't suppose that's going to worry anyone except a few fussy Sohoians";<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.powell-pressburger.org/Reviews/57_Miracle/WhatsOn.html|title=Contemporary Review - What's On in London|publisher=}}</ref> while more recently, the ''[[Radio Times]]'' wrote, "Pressburger's script aims for the sort of semi-documentary tone that had become fashionable at the time, but this romance...needed a little local colour to buck it up, not grey sociological pronouncements. Christopher Challis's grim images of Soho have a certain historical value, but, amid a plethora of dodgy accents, neither John Gregson nor Belinda Lee even comes close to convincing";<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.radiotimes.com/film/hr6mh/miracle-in-soho|title=Miracle in Soho - Film from RadioTimes|publisher=}}</ref> and ''ithankyouarthur'' wrote, "With far grittier [[Kitchen sink realism|kitchen sinks]] just around the corner, the film looks back rather than forward but still has a cosy charm all of its own and the [[Magic realism|magic realist]] tone you would expect from its author and producer."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ithankyouarthur.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/emeric-alone-miracle-in-soho-1957.html|title=Emeric alone… Miracle in Soho (1957)|publisher=}}</ref>
===Michael Powell===

Powell wrote in his memoirs that he knew what Pressburger "was trying to get over in this mixture of fantasy, realism and superstition. It's a heady mixture that appeals to central Europeans and particularly Hungarians. They like shortcuts to a situation, and they jump from joke to joke."<ref>Powell p 414</ref> Powell disliked Aymes direction and felt the set was "a shambles... which still gives me nightmares to remember."<ref>Powell p 415</ref> Powell wrote "I never saw so much plot in my life; everybody was drowning and swimming in plot and the Soho atmosphere was laid on so thick that you couldn't care whether St Anthony was watching over his flock or not."<ref>Powell p 416</ref> He also felt John Gregson was miscast in a role for which Stanley Baker would have been better suited. "John Davis had his way," wrote Powell. "This was the kind of film he wanted made at Pinewood Studios."<ref>Powell p 417</ref>
==References==
==References==
<references/>
<references/>

Revision as of 11:24, 5 August 2020

Miracle in Soho
British quad poster by Renato Fratini
Directed byJulian Amyes
Written byEmeric Pressburger
Produced byEmeric Pressburger
exec
Earl St John
associate
Sydney Streeter
StarringJohn Gregson
Belinda Lee
Cyril Cusack
CinematographyChristopher Challis
Edited byArthur Stevens
Music byBrian Easdale
Production
company
Distributed byJ. Arthur Rank Film Distributors
Release date
11 July 1957 (London premiere)
Running time
93 minutes
CountryUnited Kingdom
LanguageEnglish

Miracle in Soho is a 1957 British drama film directed by Julian Amyes and starring John Gregson, Belinda Lee and Cyril Cusack.[1] The film depicts the lives of the inhabitants of a small street in Soho and the romance between a local road-builder and the daughter of Italian immigrants.

The film had its premiere on 11 July 1957 at the Odeon Leicester Square, preceded by the British Film Academy awards.

Emeric Pressburger made the movie after his partnership with Michael Powell ended.

Plot

Michael Morgan is a labourer working with a gang, mending a road in Soho, when he meets Julia Gozzi, an Italian barmaid. Julia's brother is engaged to Gwladys, a local barmaid. Michael is a notorious womaniser and Julia's family is about to emigrate to Canada, so she resists his overtures. Julia's brother wants to stay behind because of Gwladys but Michael has already proved her an easy conquest, and saves him from a hopeless marriage.

Julia's elder sister s reluctant to go as she has a chance to marry a prosperous cafe proprietor. Julia eventually falls for Mike, and stays, only to find he doesn’t want her.

When Michael's job in Soho is finished, the affair is over, so Julia visits a local church and prays for him to come back. A miracle occurs when a burst water main brings the return of the road gang. Mike and Julia are reunited.

Main cast

Production

Emeric Pressburger wrote the script in Paris in 1934 for director Kurt Gerron. It was originally called The Miracle in St Anthony's Lane and was about German exiles in Paris. The film came close to being made in the 1930s, being optioned several times in France.[2]

Pressburger went into a highly acclaimed partnership with Michael Powell for nearly twenty years. Powell says Pressburger was always interested in Miracle saying "it had been optioned in Berlin, in Paris, and in London, and had even made one flight to Hollywood for six months before returning to its author, minus a few feathers." Powell said Pressburger tried to tell him the project "but I wasn't having any. The story was loaded with Hungarian charm but it had no substance. It was a tender trap, a good fairy, a marshmellow, the sort of film that attracts and sucks in top talent like William Wyler, Margaret Sullavan and then leaves them floundering in the gooey mess."[3] He also called it "emasculated de Maupassant" which "shows its age by the delicate way it steps around sexual relationships" and "the people in the lane are the usual ethnic stereotypes.[4]

In 1945 Pressburger announced he would director produce the film independently of Powell but it was not made after Pressburger could not secure one of the three stars he wanted (Michael Redgrave, Robert Donat, Laurence Olivier).[5]

In June 1954 Pressburger announced he and Powell would make Miracle as part of a slate of three films, the others being an adaptation of Die Fladermaus and a version of The Battle of the River Plate. Pressburger called Miracle "a love story - a sort of up-date of Seventh Heaven set in London's Soho district."[6]

They made Battle of the River Plate for the Rank Organisation. British Lion wanted to make Miracle with Stanley Baker and Diane Cilento.[7] Pressburger wanted the team to follow it up with three movies: Ill Met By Moonlight, Miracle in St Anthony's Lane and Cassie. They made Ill Met By Moonlight but fought do much during the process that the partnership terminated.[8]

Battle of the River Plate was a financial and critical success. Sir John Davis of Rank agreed to finance Miracle (which became Miracle in Soho) with Pressburger writing and producing for a fee of £11,000. Pressburger did not want to direct as he felt he was too close to the story (he had directed once before and not liked it). Sir John Davis, head of Rank, allowed Pressburger to select a director from a short list of three young TV directors.[9] Powell said he felt Davis was "maneuvering Eric into a position he could not defend" and suggested that Pressburger ask a more experienced director like David Lean or Carol Reed, or Jack Cardiff, who had been cinematographer on several Powell-Pressburger movies. However Pressburger picked the TV director Julian Aymes. Powell said Aymes "couldn't direct traffic".[10]

Aymes had been working mostly in TV but moved to features to make Hill in Korea and Miracle in Soho. According to Aymes' obituary, "This was not a particularly happy time for Julian Amyes. He felt that the film business did not really suit him and he seemed to have to spend far too much of his time reading and rejecting bad scripts. For him the atmosphere of television was an altogether happier one where he felt he had much greater creative freedom."[11]

Pressburger decided to make the movie entirely in the studio. He hired Carmen Dillon to do the art direction; Dillon had worked on Laurence Olivier's films of Henry V and Richard III' and the producer wanted some of her theatricality.[12]

Filming started January 1957.[13] The shoot took eight weeks and was finished by 15 March. John Davis saw a cut on 26 July.[14]

Reception

Box Office

According to a biography of David Lean the film was "a big flop" for which Sir John Davis blamed Emeric Pressberger and "made it plain that he had no future with Rank."[15]

Pressburger's biographer said "the public stayed as far away as possible. If Emeric harboured delusions of a career as a solo producer, Miracle knocked them out of him.He was no longer a bankable propsect for the Rank Organisation."[16]

Critical reception

Variety called it "a slow-moving sentimental yarn... a simple story that lacks punch and gives the impression that more could be made of the colorful material. It rates as fair entertainment that should cash in on the popularity of the stars... John Gregson never seems quite at home in rough clothes but makes a likeable personality... and Belinda Lee is simple and naive as the anglicized Italian girl in love with him."[17]

The Monthly Film Bulletin said "This depressing production, with its synthetic Soho setting, has characters conceived strictly within the less happy conventions of British comedy. The lack of any style or pace in the writing needlessly vulgarises the central situation, though John Gregson and Belinda Lee do manage to convey a certain superficial charm."[18]

Pressburger's biographer called it "a film with few redeeming features. Emeric had lugged the story around for so long he seems to have forgotten exactly what it was about. But the muddled plot and sledge hammer characterisation are not the only flaws. Carmen Dillon let him down badly. The sets are small, stolid and cramped and about as lacking in flair as they could be. As for the direction, it is utterly aimless."[19]

Screenonline said "the film's evocation of Soho was outdated by 1957, too studio-bound and art-directed to capture the multi-ethnic authenticity it wanted. The huge sets, designed by Oscar-winning Carmen Dillon, complemented Pressburger's view of the magic that appears in everyday life, but in a climate increasingly dominated by social realism, the street looked stilted and fake. Despite this, and its frivolity, Pressburger's script depicts a communal Soho that would soon be submerged beneath its growing reputation as a centre of vice and exotica."[20]

In a contemporary review, What's On in London called the film a "sentimental little fairy story...Peter Illing, as Papa, brings this coloured celluloid confection to life every time he comes on the screen, and Cyril Cusack, as the Salvationist postman, is very good, too. Of course, this isn't really Soho at all, but I don't suppose that's going to worry anyone except a few fussy Sohoians";[21] while more recently, the Radio Times wrote, "Pressburger's script aims for the sort of semi-documentary tone that had become fashionable at the time, but this romance...needed a little local colour to buck it up, not grey sociological pronouncements. Christopher Challis's grim images of Soho have a certain historical value, but, amid a plethora of dodgy accents, neither John Gregson nor Belinda Lee even comes close to convincing";[22] and ithankyouarthur wrote, "With far grittier kitchen sinks just around the corner, the film looks back rather than forward but still has a cosy charm all of its own and the magic realist tone you would expect from its author and producer."[23]

Michael Powell

Powell wrote in his memoirs that he knew what Pressburger "was trying to get over in this mixture of fantasy, realism and superstition. It's a heady mixture that appeals to central Europeans and particularly Hungarians. They like shortcuts to a situation, and they jump from joke to joke."[24] Powell disliked Aymes direction and felt the set was "a shambles... which still gives me nightmares to remember."[25] Powell wrote "I never saw so much plot in my life; everybody was drowning and swimming in plot and the Soho atmosphere was laid on so thick that you couldn't care whether St Anthony was watching over his flock or not."[26] He also felt John Gregson was miscast in a role for which Stanley Baker would have been better suited. "John Davis had his way," wrote Powell. "This was the kind of film he wanted made at Pinewood Studios."[27]

References

  1. ^ "Miracle in Soho (1957)". Archived from the original on 14 January 2009.
  2. ^ MacDonald p 304
  3. ^ Powell p 220
  4. ^ Powell p 281
  5. ^ MacDonald p 264
  6. ^ BY WAY OF REPORT: Graf Spee Story to Be Filmed -- Other Items BY A. H. WEILER. New York Times 20 June 1954: X5.
  7. ^ MacDonald p 358
  8. ^ Powell p 304
  9. ^ Macdonald p 365
  10. ^ Powell p 415
  11. ^ Julian Amyes;Obituary The Times; London (UK) [London (UK)]27 Apr 1992.
  12. ^ Macdonald p 366
  13. ^ "Rank to Make 23 British Pix in 57". Variety. 2 January 1957. p. 10.
  14. ^ MacDonald p 366
  15. ^ Brownlow, Kevin (1996). David Lean : a biography. A Wyatt Book for St. Martin's Press. p. 395.
  16. ^ MacDonald p 367
  17. ^ Review of film at Variety
  18. ^ Monthly Film Bulletin. Vol. 24, no. 283. August 1957. p. 104 [www.screenonline.org.uk/media/mfb/1006727/index.html www.screenonline.org.uk/media/mfb/1006727/index.html]. {{cite magazine}}: Check |url= value (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)
  19. ^ Macdonald p 366-367
  20. ^ Miracle at Soho at BFI Screenonline
  21. ^ "Contemporary Review - What's On in London".
  22. ^ "Miracle in Soho - Film from RadioTimes".
  23. ^ "Emeric alone… Miracle in Soho (1957)".
  24. ^ Powell p 414
  25. ^ Powell p 415
  26. ^ Powell p 416
  27. ^ Powell p 417

Notes

  • Macdonald, Kevin (1994). Emeric Pressburger. Faber and Faber.

External links


Stub icon

This article related to a British film of the 1950s is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Miracle_in_Soho&oldid=971320289"