Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DICE (band): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Alexis Jazz (talk | contribs) |
Ravenswing (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:* (blinks) Err ... the other national Wikipedias tend to their own gardens, and more to the point, each have their own notions of notability. That being said, sorry: if eleven years was not enough to come up with reliable, independent sources satisfying the GNG and NBAND, and seven days of deletion discussion ''here'' is not enough to come up with reliable sources satisfying the GNG and NBAND, then that is really rather a clear sign that either no one cares enough to bother and/or the subject just does not qualify for an article on Wikipedia. [[User talk:Ravenswing|'''<span style="background:#7F00FF;color:#00FFFF"> '' Ravenswing '' </span>''' ]] 07:20, 25 July 2020 (UTC) |
:* (blinks) Err ... the other national Wikipedias tend to their own gardens, and more to the point, each have their own notions of notability. That being said, sorry: if eleven years was not enough to come up with reliable, independent sources satisfying the GNG and NBAND, and seven days of deletion discussion ''here'' is not enough to come up with reliable sources satisfying the GNG and NBAND, then that is really rather a clear sign that either no one cares enough to bother and/or the subject just does not qualify for an article on Wikipedia. [[User talk:Ravenswing|'''<span style="background:#7F00FF;color:#00FFFF"> '' Ravenswing '' </span>''' ]] 07:20, 25 July 2020 (UTC) |
||
::* (blinks) PROD is not a discussion. Sorry but you just sound like a broken record. Repeating your points over and over doesn't make them any more meaningful. If ten years wasn't enough to PROD the article, you've had your chance. Anything that's not done within 10 years doesn't mean nobody cares. Some things actually take longer than 10 years on wiki. Counting numbers of users who care over some period doesn't establish notability. - [[User talk:Alexis Jazz|Alexis Jazz]] 18:45, 26 July 2020 (UTC) |
::* (blinks) PROD is not a discussion. Sorry but you just sound like a broken record. Repeating your points over and over doesn't make them any more meaningful. If ten years wasn't enough to PROD the article, you've had your chance. Anything that's not done within 10 years doesn't mean nobody cares. Some things actually take longer than 10 years on wiki. Counting numbers of users who care over some period doesn't establish notability. - [[User talk:Alexis Jazz|Alexis Jazz]] 18:45, 26 July 2020 (UTC) |
||
:::* ... whoof. You're honestly implying that it takes over ten years to source an article? That does say it all, doesn't it. [[User talk:Ravenswing|'''<span style="background:#2B22AA;color:#E285FF"> '' Ravenswing '' </span>''' ]] 18:59, 26 July 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:59, 26 July 2020
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- DICE (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
NN band, fails the GNG and WP:BAND. No substantive coverage in reliable sources found. Notability tagged for over a decade. Created and built upon by a SPA for whom this is the sole Wikipedia activity (and, startlingly enough, stretched over eleven years, which leads to wondering about COI).
(And before anyone asks, this is a mirror image of the article on the German Wikipedia, which is likewise source-free.) Ravenswing 06:19, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ravenswing 06:19, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Ravenswing 06:19, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I dumped an incomplete list of links on Talk:DICE (band). I will take some time to integrate some into the article if the article isn't doomed to begin with, which I find difficult to determine. I'd also like to say that I'd rather see this discussion happening on dewiki first, because dewiki users will have an easier time examining the sources. - Alexis Jazz 06:37, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- (blinks) Err ... the other national Wikipedias tend to their own gardens, and more to the point, each have their own notions of notability. That being said, sorry: if eleven years was not enough to come up with reliable, independent sources satisfying the GNG and NBAND, and seven days of deletion discussion here is not enough to come up with reliable sources satisfying the GNG and NBAND, then that is really rather a clear sign that either no one cares enough to bother and/or the subject just does not qualify for an article on Wikipedia. Ravenswing 07:20, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- (blinks) PROD is not a discussion. Sorry but you just sound like a broken record. Repeating your points over and over doesn't make them any more meaningful. If ten years wasn't enough to PROD the article, you've had your chance. Anything that's not done within 10 years doesn't mean nobody cares. Some things actually take longer than 10 years on wiki. Counting numbers of users who care over some period doesn't establish notability. - Alexis Jazz 18:45, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- ... whoof. You're honestly implying that it takes over ten years to source an article? That does say it all, doesn't it. Ravenswing 18:59, 26 July 2020 (UTC)