Marleen (Australian Playhouse): Difference between revisions
→Cast: add |
add reference |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
==Plot== |
==Plot== |
||
Three marching girls are waiting for the results of a competition to elect the World Miss Marching Girl. One of them has a more sinister goal.<ref>{{cite news|newspaper=Sydney Morning Herald|date=July 18, 1966|title=TV Guide|page=13}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |
Three marching girls are waiting for the results of a competition to elect the World Miss Marching Girl. One of them has a more sinister goal. Her parents end up shooting a girl.<ref>{{cite news|newspaper=Sydney Morning Herald|date=July 18, 1966|title=TV Guide|page=13}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |
||
| title=The bulletin |
| title=The bulletin |
||
| publication-date=1880 |
| publication-date=1880 |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
One critic argued "it is time... ''Australian Playhouse'' had an independent audit. The works we are seeing ore not worth more than two cents of the licence fee. Pat Flower's "Marleen"... was a macabre grin at nothing. Those who saw it must have wondered if they themselves were short on brains, so short was it on plausible entertainment. Those who didn't see it need not die worrying. But Miss Flower cannot be blamed for the series. Efforts which should never have gone to air have included a puerile analogy between a parking ticket and an early baby ... a prissy story about a dotty couple tricking each other over a dead man . . . not to mention the short, short bit of witlessncss in which a husband and a lover were ever so conveniently trapped in a lift. The series has had few moments one cares to remember. It would be unfair to blame David Goddard, the overall director, or any of his studio teams. They are involved in production and cannot be expected to stand off with objective judgments. What is required is an independent judge to evaluate scripts, check again at rehearsals and stop dead every play that doesn't look like rising above workshop level. Otherwise, Australian Playhouse will do more harm than good to the cause of home-grown TV."<ref>{{cite news|first=Harry|last=Robinson|newspaper= Sydney Morning Herald|date= July 20, 1966|title=TELEVISION Barry didn't play it cool|page=16}}</ref> |
One critic argued "it is time... ''Australian Playhouse'' had an independent audit. The works we are seeing ore not worth more than two cents of the licence fee. Pat Flower's "Marleen"... was a macabre grin at nothing. Those who saw it must have wondered if they themselves were short on brains, so short was it on plausible entertainment. Those who didn't see it need not die worrying. But Miss Flower cannot be blamed for the series. Efforts which should never have gone to air have included a puerile analogy between a parking ticket and an early baby ... a prissy story about a dotty couple tricking each other over a dead man . . . not to mention the short, short bit of witlessncss in which a husband and a lover were ever so conveniently trapped in a lift. The series has had few moments one cares to remember. It would be unfair to blame David Goddard, the overall director, or any of his studio teams. They are involved in production and cannot be expected to stand off with objective judgments. What is required is an independent judge to evaluate scripts, check again at rehearsals and stop dead every play that doesn't look like rising above workshop level. Otherwise, Australian Playhouse will do more harm than good to the cause of home-grown TV."<ref>{{cite news|first=Harry|last=Robinson|newspaper= Sydney Morning Herald|date= July 20, 1966|title=TELEVISION Barry didn't play it cool|page=16}}</ref> |
||
The ''Age'' said "the ABC had never presented anything sillier."<ref>{{cite news|newspaper=The Age|last=Monitor|date=23 July 1960|title=TV Could be the Bridge|url=https://www.newspapers.com/image/122540671/?terms=%22australian%2Bplayhouse%22}}</ref> |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
Girls’ hall, were an advance in more ways than one. But I do wish that someone would write a simple comedy or two for the series." <ref>{{Citation |
Girls’ hall, were an advance in more ways than one. But I do wish that someone would write a simple comedy or two for the series." <ref>{{Citation |
||
| title=The bulletin |
| title=The bulletin |
||
Revision as of 15:30, 28 June 2020
| "Marleen" | |
|---|---|
| Australian Playhouse episode | |
| Episode no. | Season 1 Episode 13 |
| Teleplay by | Pat Flower |
| Original air date | July 18, 1966 |
| Running time | 30 mins |
Marleen is a 1966 television play broadcast by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. It was part of Australian Playhouse.[1] Australian TV drama was relatively rare at the time.[2]
Plot
Three marching girls are waiting for the results of a competition to elect the World Miss Marching Girl. One of them has a more sinister goal. Her parents end up shooting a girl.[3][4]
Cast
- Joy Mitchell
- Fay Kelton
- Sydney Conabere
- Elizabeth Harris
- Dorothy Bradley
Reception
The play was poorly reviewed.[5]
One critic argued "it is time... Australian Playhouse had an independent audit. The works we are seeing ore not worth more than two cents of the licence fee. Pat Flower's "Marleen"... was a macabre grin at nothing. Those who saw it must have wondered if they themselves were short on brains, so short was it on plausible entertainment. Those who didn't see it need not die worrying. But Miss Flower cannot be blamed for the series. Efforts which should never have gone to air have included a puerile analogy between a parking ticket and an early baby ... a prissy story about a dotty couple tricking each other over a dead man . . . not to mention the short, short bit of witlessncss in which a husband and a lover were ever so conveniently trapped in a lift. The series has had few moments one cares to remember. It would be unfair to blame David Goddard, the overall director, or any of his studio teams. They are involved in production and cannot be expected to stand off with objective judgments. What is required is an independent judge to evaluate scripts, check again at rehearsals and stop dead every play that doesn't look like rising above workshop level. Otherwise, Australian Playhouse will do more harm than good to the cause of home-grown TV."[6]
The Age said "the ABC had never presented anything sillier."[7]
The Bulletin said Pat Flower "is beginning to get the half hour length. The use of film behind, and the senseless, but eerie, marching of the girls up and down the Marching- Girls’ hall, were an advance in more ways than one. But I do wish that someone would write a simple comedy or two for the series." [8]
See also
References
- ^ "The Sydney Morning Herald - Google News Archive Search". news.google.com. Retrieved 28 May 2016.
- ^ Vagg, Stephen (18 February 2019). "60 Australian TV Plays of the 1950s & '60s". Filmink.
- ^ "TV Guide". Sydney Morning Herald. 18 July 1966. p. 13.
- ^ The bulletin, John Haynes and J.F. Archibald, 1880, retrieved 22 March 2019
- ^ "THE MARCHING GIRLS". Sydney Morning Herald. 19 July 1966. p. 13.
- ^ Robinson, Harry (20 July 1966). "TELEVISION Barry didn't play it cool". Sydney Morning Herald. p. 16.
- ^ Monitor (23 July 1960). "TV Could be the Bridge". The Age.
- ^ The bulletin, John Haynes and J.F. Archibald, 1880, retrieved 23 March 2019
External links
 | This article related to an Australian made-for-TV movie is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |