Midland Metals Overseas Pte Ltd v The Christchurch Press Co Ltd: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →top: Date formats |
m Normalize {{Multiple issues}}: Remove {{Multiple issues}} for only 1 maintenance template(s): Unreferenced |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2019}} |
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2019}} |
||
{{multiple issues| |
|||
{{Orphan|date=December 2014}} |
{{Orphan|date=December 2014}} |
||
{{unreferenced|date=December 2014}} |
{{unreferenced|date=December 2014}} |
||
}} |
|||
{{Infobox court case |
{{Infobox court case |
||
Revision as of 19:02, 31 May 2020
 |
| Midland Metals Overseas Pte Ltd v The Christchurch Press Co Ltd | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | Court of Appeal of New Zealand |
| Full case name | Midland Metals Overseas Pte Limited v The Christchurch Press Company Limited, Orion New Zealand Limited, TL Scott, SJJ Hirsch, Wellington Newspapers Limited, and The New Zealand Press Association |
| Decided | 24 October 2001 |
| Citation(s) | [2002] 2 NZLR 289 |
| Transcript(s) | Court of Appeal judgment |
| Court membership | |
| Judge(s) sitting | Gault P, Tipping J, Blanchard J, Tipping J, McGrath J |
Midland Metals Overseas Pte Ltd v The Christchurch Press Co Ltd [2002] 2 NZLR 289 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding owing a duty of care in negligence.
References
 | This article relating to case law in New Zealand is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |