Van Soest v Residual Health Management Unit: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →top: Date formats |
m Normalize {{Multiple issues}}: Remove {{Multiple issues}} for only 1 maintenance template(s): Refimprove |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2019}} |
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2019}} |
||
{{refimprove|date=October 2014}}{{orphan|date=October 2014}} |
|||
}} |
|||
{{Infobox court case |
{{Infobox court case |
||
Latest revision as of 18:47, 31 May 2020
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (October 2014) |
| Van Soest v Residual Health Management Unit | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | Court of Appeal of New Zealand |
| Full case name | J&P Van Soest v Residual Health Management Unit and K Ramstead |
| Decided | 27 September 1999 |
| Citation(s) | [2001] 1 NZLR 179 |
| Transcript(s) | Court of Appeal judgment |
| Court membership | |
| Judge(s) sitting | Gault J, Thomas J, Henry J, Keith J, Blanchard J |
| Keywords | |
| negligence | |
Van Soest v Residual Health Management Unit [2001] 1 NZLR 179 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding nervous shock cases .[1]
Background[edit]
This case involves relatives of patients that died during surgery under surgeon Keith Ramstead at Christchurch Hospital.
The relatives sued the Residual Health Management in tort for the nervous shock that they suffered as a result of having a relative die.
Held[edit]
The Court of Appeal rejected the relatives claim, as they were only claiming they suffered grief, holding that they law required a higher standard for a nervous shock case to be successful.
References[edit]
- ^ McLay, Geoff (2003). Butterworths Student Companion Torts (4th ed.). LexisNexis. ISBN 0-408-71686-X.
 | This article relating to case law in New Zealand is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |