Allianz SpA v West Tankers: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →top: clean up; http→https for Google Books using AWB |
m Normalize {{Multiple issues}}: Remove {{Multiple issues}} for only 1 maintenance template(s): Technical |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Multiple issues | |
|||
{{Orphan|date=May 2014}} |
{{Orphan|date=May 2014}} |
||
{{technical|date=June 2014}} |
{{technical|date=June 2014}} |
||
}} |
|||
{{Infobox European case |
{{Infobox European case |
||
|court=ECJ |
|court=ECJ |
||
Revision as of 18:06, 31 May 2020
 | This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. (June 2014) |
| Allianz SpA v West Tankers | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Submitted 2 April 2007 Decided 10 February 2009 | |
| Full case name | Allianz SpA, formerly Riunione Adriatica di Sicurtà SpA, Generali Assicurazioni Generali SpA, v West Tankers Inc. |
| Case | C‑185/07 |
| CelexID | 62007CJ0185 |
| ECLI | ECLI:EU:C:2009:69 |
| Case type | Reference for a preliminary ruling |
| Chamber | Full chamber |
| Procedural history | Reference of the House of Lords (United Kingdom) |
| Court composition | |
| Judge-Rapporteur J. Klučka | |
| President V. Skouris | |
| Judges | |
| Advocate General J. Kokott | |
| Legislation affecting | |
| Interprets Brussels Regulation | |
| Keywords | |
| antisuit injunction, arbitration | |
Allianz SpA v West Tankers is a preliminary ruling by Full Chamber the Court of Justice of the Court of Justice of the European Union upon a reference for a preliminary ruling from the House of Lords. The court held that the validity of arbitration agreements falls within the scope of the Brussels regulation, but that anti-suit injunction can not be given.[1]
See also
References
- ^ Neil Andrews. The Three Paths of Justice: Court Proceedings, Arbitration, and Mediation in England. Springer. Retrieved 24 May 2014.
  | This article relating to European Union law is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |