Multi-domestic strategy: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
m Alter: template type. Add: doi. Removed parameters. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here.| Activated by User:NessieVL | Category:Orphaned articles from February 2011 | via #UCB_Category
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Normalize {{Multiple issues}}: Remove {{Multiple issues}} for only 1 maintenance template(s): More citations needed
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Multiple issues|
{{more citations needed|date=August 2009}}
{{more citations needed|date=August 2009}}
{{orphan|date=February 2011}}
{{orphan|date=February 2011}}
}}


A '''multi-domestic strategy''' is a strategy by which [[company|companies]] try to achieve maximum local responsiveness by customizing both their product offering and [[marketing strategy]] to match different national conditions. Production, [[marketing]], and [[R&D]] activities tend to be established in each major national market where business is done.
A '''multi-domestic strategy''' is a strategy by which [[company|companies]] try to achieve maximum local responsiveness by customizing both their product offering and [[marketing strategy]] to match different national conditions. Production, [[marketing]], and [[R&D]] activities tend to be established in each major national market where business is done.

Revision as of 05:26, 31 May 2020

A multi-domestic strategy is a strategy by which companies try to achieve maximum local responsiveness by customizing both their product offering and marketing strategy to match different national conditions. Production, marketing, and R&D activities tend to be established in each major national market where business is done.

An alternate use of the term describes the organization of multi-national firms. International or multinational companies gain economies of scale through shared overhead, and market similar products in multiple countries. Multi-domestic companies have separate headquarters in different countries, thereby attaining more localized management, but at the higher cost of forgoing the economies of scale from cost sharing and centralization.[1][2]

References

  1. ^ Kihn, Lili-Anne (15 December 2008). "Strategies, Decentralization, and Controls in Internationalized Finnish Firms". SSRN 1315410. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  2. ^ Roth, Kendall; Morrison, Allen J. (29 April 1992). "Implementing Global Strategy: Characteristics of Global Subsidiary Mandates". Journal of International Business Studies. 23 (4): 715–735. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490285. JSTOR 155156.