Exit consent: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m →‎top: clean up and formatting, added orphan tag using AWB
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Normalize {{Multiple issues}}: Remove {{Multiple issues}} for only 1 maintenance template(s): Unreferenced
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Multiple issues|
{{Orphan|date=November 2017}}
{{Orphan|date=November 2017}}
{{Unreferenced|date=December 2009}}
{{Unreferenced|date=December 2009}}
}}


'''Exit consent''' is a formal agreement that allows a majority group of [[creditor]]s holding [[sovereign bond]]s to change the non-financial terms of the bonds in a way that makes the bonds effectively worthless for the minority holdouts, motivating them to accept a [[restructuring]] offer. Thus creditors willing to restructure can outmaneuver holdouts by using the [[supermajority]] voting features of existing bonds to secure changes, which reduce their value as they are tendered in exchange for restructured debt.
'''Exit consent''' is a formal agreement that allows a majority group of [[creditor]]s holding [[sovereign bond]]s to change the non-financial terms of the bonds in a way that makes the bonds effectively worthless for the minority holdouts, motivating them to accept a [[restructuring]] offer. Thus creditors willing to restructure can outmaneuver holdouts by using the [[supermajority]] voting features of existing bonds to secure changes, which reduce their value as they are tendered in exchange for restructured debt.

Revision as of 01:26, 31 May 2020

Exit consent is a formal agreement that allows a majority group of creditors holding sovereign bonds to change the non-financial terms of the bonds in a way that makes the bonds effectively worthless for the minority holdouts, motivating them to accept a restructuring offer. Thus creditors willing to restructure can outmaneuver holdouts by using the supermajority voting features of existing bonds to secure changes, which reduce their value as they are tendered in exchange for restructured debt.

Reason

Government bond issued by sovereign nations are often perceived as safe investments. But over time, countries in difficulty economic situations have needed to restructure their debt structure, or see its national economy collapse. During that process, it must restructure the outstanding debt by offering its old bonds holders new instruments that reflect new financial terms. It is a process that sees the emergence of holdout creditors who refuse the proposed restructuring, posing a problem to the reorganization process the holdout problem. Therefore, the threat of an exit consent is used to encourage (or coerce) minority creditors to accept the exchange offer so they are not left with diminished bonds.

See also

References