Jump to content

The Flame of New Orleans: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
add
Line 22: Line 22:
}}
}}
'''''The Flame of New Orleans''''' is a 1941 [[comedy]] film directed by [[René Clair]] and starring [[Marlene Dietrich]] and [[Bruce Cabot]] in his first comedy role. The supporting cast features [[Roland Young]], [[Andy Devine]] and [[Franklin Pangborn]].
'''''The Flame of New Orleans''''' is a 1941 [[comedy]] film directed by [[René Clair]] and starring [[Marlene Dietrich]] and [[Bruce Cabot]] in his first comedy role. The supporting cast features [[Roland Young]], [[Andy Devine]] and [[Franklin Pangborn]].

It was the last of several films Dietrich made with producer Joe Pasternak who called it "in many ways, our most interesting."<ref>Pasternak p 207</ref>


The movie was nominated for an [[Academy Awards|Oscar]] for [[Academy Award for Best Production Design|Best Art Direction]] by [[Martin Obzina]], [[Jack Otterson]] and [[Russell A. Gausman]].<ref name="NY Times">{{cite web |url=https://movies.nytimes.com/movie/91629/The-Flame-of-New-Orleans/details |title=NY Times: The Flame of New Orleans |accessdate=2008-12-13|work=NY Times}}</ref>
The movie was nominated for an [[Academy Awards|Oscar]] for [[Academy Award for Best Production Design|Best Art Direction]] by [[Martin Obzina]], [[Jack Otterson]] and [[Russell A. Gausman]].<ref name="NY Times">{{cite web |url=https://movies.nytimes.com/movie/91629/The-Flame-of-New-Orleans/details |title=NY Times: The Flame of New Orleans |accessdate=2008-12-13|work=NY Times}}</ref>
Line 66: Line 68:


==Production==
==Production==
===Development===
The movie was the first American feature from Rene Clair, who had been forced to leave France due to World War Two.

The star was Marlene Dietrich who had revived her career at Universal appearing in ''[[Destry Rides Again]]'' (1939) produced by Joe Pasternak. In May 1940 Universal announced it would make two Dietrich films over the following year: ''[[Seven Sinners]]'' and ''The Countess of New Orleans''. Both were to be among the studio's bigger budgeted productions.<ref>UNIVERSAL PLANS TO MAKE 59 FILMS New York Times 13 May 1940: 23. </ref>
The star was Marlene Dietrich who had revived her career at Universal appearing in ''[[Destry Rides Again]]'' (1939) produced by Joe Pasternak. In May 1940 Universal announced it would make two Dietrich films over the following year: ''[[Seven Sinners]]'' and ''The Countess of New Orleans''. Both were to be among the studio's bigger budgeted productions.<ref>UNIVERSAL PLANS TO MAKE 59 FILMS New York Times 13 May 1940: 23. </ref>


In October 1940 Universal announced the director of ''Countess'' would be [[Rene Clair]]. It was his first Hollywood movie although he had directed two English-language films in England.<ref>SCREEN NEWS HERE AND IN HOLLYWOOD New York Times 1 Oct 1940: 34. </ref> Dietrich later said Clair's hiring was Pastenak's idea and "at first I resisted, but finally out of loyalty to my old principle that doing
In October 1940 Universal announced the director of ''Countess'' would be [[Rene Clair]], who had arrived in Lisbon from France in August. It was Clair's first Hollywood movie although he had directed two English-language films in England.<ref>SCREEN NEWS HERE AND IN HOLLYWOOD New York Times 1 Oct 1940: 34. </ref> Dietrich later said Clair's hiring was Pastenak's idea and "at first I resisted, but finally out of loyalty to my old principle that doing your duty was all that mattered, I yielded."<ref name="flop"/> Pasternak wrote in his memoirs that he suggested Clair, asked Dietrich "What do you say?" and she said "I think it'd be wonderful."<ref name=
your duty was all that mattered, I yielded."<ref name="flop"/>


In November Universal said they hoped to make the film in the next month.<ref>'Week-end for Three' Likely Dunne Subject Los Angeles Times 1 Nov 1940: A10. </ref> However this did not happen. In December Universal said the film would now be called ''The Flame of New Orleans'' and star Andy Devine, Roland Young and [[Broderick Crawford]] alongside Dietrich.<ref>NEWS OF THE SCREEN New York Times 23 Dec 1940: 25. </ref>
In November Universal said they hoped to make the film in the next month.<ref>'Week-end for Three' Likely Dunne Subject Los Angeles Times 1 Nov 1940: A10. </ref> However this did not happen. In December Universal said the film would now be called ''The Flame of New Orleans'' and star Andy Devine, Roland Young and [[Broderick Crawford]] alongside Dietrich.<ref>NEWS OF THE SCREEN New York Times 23 Dec 1940: 25. </ref>
Line 88: Line 88:
==Reception==
==Reception==
===Critical===
===Critical===
Hedda Hopper said the film was like "molasses in January... Clair's direction lacks the zip we demand... the flame simmered down to a slow burn."<ref>Hedda Hopper's HOLLYWOOD Los Angeles Times 26 Apr 1941: A9. </ref>
Hedda Hopper said the film was like "molasses in January... Clair's direction lacks the zip we demand... the flame simmered down to a slow burn."<ref>Hedda Hopper's HOLLYWOOD Los Angeles Times 26 Apr 1941: A9. </ref> The film received poor reviews on the whole.<ref>Dietrich's 'Flame' or Rene Clair's? Critics Fall Out
Griffith, Richard. Los Angeles Times 6 May 1941: 12. </ref>

Pasternak wrote "the critics were, I thought, unfair to Rene. It is my firm conviction that if Clair had made this same picture in France and it had come over here with a French soundtrack and the usual subtitles, the critical ladies and gentlemen would have been talking about "Gallic wit," "the deft French touch," and "Latin sauci- ness." As it was, they jumped on us hard for trying to do something a little different. And— I'm sure unconsciously— they berated Rene Clair for making films in this country instead of France, not realizing that Rene had come here in search of that freedom which his pictures have always sung."<ref name="joe"/>

Pasternak also felt "the critics were most cruel to" Dietrich "chiding her for being mannered again and all the rest of it. She thought she was spoofing her old self, but apparently the gentle satire was lost." Pasternak wrote "Marlene didn't mind" because the war was going badly for the Allies "and Marlene's heart was not entirely centered on making motion pictures. She was thinking about the war and her adopted country's imminent part in it. Myself, I was trying to get out of my contract with Universal."<ref name="joe">{{cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/easyhardway00joep/page/208?q=%22flame+of+new+orleans%22|first=Joe|last=Pasternak|page=208|title=Easy the Hard Way|year=1956 |publisher=Putnam }}</ref>
===Box Office===
===Box Office===
Clair called the film "a big flop, and a great handicap in my American
Clair called the film "a big flop, and a great handicap in my American
Line 96: Line 101:
as always, wore lavish costumes, but that wasn’t enough. I didn’t particularly
as always, wore lavish costumes, but that wasn’t enough. I didn’t particularly
like Rend Clair, but I didn’t hate him as much as the rest did."<ref name="flop">{{cite book|page=136-137|url=https://archive.org/details/HollywoodTalksTurkeyTheScreensGreatestFlopsByDougMcClellandStarbrite/page/n151?q=%22flame+of+new+orleans%22|title=Hollywood Talks Turkey - The Screen's Greatest Flops|first=Doug|last= McClelland|year=1989|publisher= Starbrite}} </ref>
like Rend Clair, but I didn’t hate him as much as the rest did."<ref name="flop">{{cite book|page=136-137|url=https://archive.org/details/HollywoodTalksTurkeyTheScreensGreatestFlopsByDougMcClellandStarbrite/page/n151?q=%22flame+of+new+orleans%22|title=Hollywood Talks Turkey - The Screen's Greatest Flops|first=Doug|last= McClelland|year=1989|publisher= Starbrite}} </ref>

Pasternak wrote "I did not think it made the bookkeepers at Universal very happy."<ref name="joe"/>

The box office disappointment of the movie, along with other Pasternak productions ''Nice Girl'' and ''A Little Bit of Heaven'' led to Universal being difficult with the budgets of Pasternak's movies - and contributed to the producer leaving Universal and going to MGM.<ref>Mr. Pasternak's Farewell to Universal -- Short Feature Production Begins By DOUGLAS W. CHURCHILL. New York Times15 June 1941: X3. </ref>
==Notes==
==Notes==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}

Revision as of 05:03, 16 October 2019

The Flame of New Orleans
Directed byRené Clair
Written byNorman Krasna
Uncredited:
René Clair
Produced byRené Clair
Joe Pasternak
StarringMarlene Dietrich
Bruce Cabot
Roland Young
Mischa Auer
Andy Devine
Eddie Quillan
Anne Revere
CinematographyRudolph Maté
Edited byFrank Gross
Music byFrank Skinner
Production
company
Distributed byUniversal Pictures
Release date
  • April 6, 1941 (1941-04-06) (U.S.)
Running time
79 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$2,000,000

The Flame of New Orleans is a 1941 comedy film directed by René Clair and starring Marlene Dietrich and Bruce Cabot in his first comedy role. The supporting cast features Roland Young, Andy Devine and Franklin Pangborn.

It was the last of several films Dietrich made with producer Joe Pasternak who called it "in many ways, our most interesting."[1]

The movie was nominated for an Oscar for Best Art Direction by Martin Obzina, Jack Otterson and Russell A. Gausman.[2]

Plot summary

The legend of "Claire of New Orleans" is born after two fishermen find a wedding dress floating around on the Mississippi River one day. The legend tells that the Countess Claire Ledux disappeared on her wedding day in the year of 1840, and when the dress was found, the people of New Orleans assumed that the bride had committed suicide by throwing herself into the river. This is how the story begins, and then we find out what really happened, as the story of Claire Ledux is revealed.

When Claire arrives in New Orleans for the first time in her life she has a strong ambition to become Mrs Charles Giraud - a very rich and renowned banker. She gets her opening one night at the opera, when she manages to get the seat next to the banker. Trying to catch the unsuspecting banker's attention she fakes fainting in her seat. The banker immediately rushes to her rescue and Claire's mission is accomplished. Desperate to see the beautiful Claire again, Charles sends his valet over to Claire's maid Clementine after the opera. The maid forwards the message, asking Claire to meet with Charles in the park. Claire and the maid make a plan to let a man harass Claire in the park, so that Charles can come to her "rescue". But even the simplest plans go wrong, and on the way to the park Claire's carriage runs over a monkey by accident. The monkey belongs to river boat captain Robert Latour. he stops the carriage, but since Clementine believes this is the man they hired to make a fuzz with them, she tells the driver to go on and ignore the man. Robert Latour is aggravated by this behaviour and tips the carriage over.

After this incident, where Charles was not only stood up by Claire since the carriage never arrived, but also deprived of a chance to come to her aid, he swears to avenge Robert Latour's insolent behaviour. He also vows to properly take care of and guard Claire every night from now on.

Attending a Mardi Gras festivity, Claire recognizes Robert Latour in the crowd, and points him out to Charles, who is quick to challenge Robert to a duel. Robert gets to choose weapons, and he chooses knives, something Charles isn't quite prepared for. Robert gets a distinct advantage over Charles in the duel, and Claire steps in to interrupt what she fears will be the end of the banker's life. She tells Charles that she mistook Robert for someone else, thus ending the battle.

To settle the matter once and for all, Robert invites Claire to dinner on his rover boat the following night. He borrows 150 dollars to pay for the feast. But while Claire is getting ready for her meeting with Robert, Charles arrives and throws her a proposal of marriage there on the spot. Claire accepts his proposal, and sends a message via her maid to Robert, cancelling the dinner without telling him the real reason. Robert fears that Claire is taken ill and in need of a doctor. He rushes over to her house to offer his assistance, but sees Charles through the window, and realizes the real reason for her rejection.

Only two days before their wedding Charles throws a party in Claire's honor. To the party comes many distinguished guests, and among them are the newly arrived Russian gentleman Zolotov. This man sees Claire and recognizes her from St. Petersburg. During the evening Zolotov tells stories of Claire to a friend of his, Bellows, and Charles' brother-in-law hears them talk. Charles hears of the stories and is upset, challenging Zolotov to a duel. Zolotov has no wish to enter a duel with the banker, and swears he must have been mistaken, since the girl he knew was known to fake fainting to get a man's attention. At this point Claire faints - for real this time, and is carried out of the room.

The next day Charles comes to visit Claire in her home in order to break off their engagement. He doesn't get to meet Claire, but is instead confronted by a woman named Lili - Claire's look-alike and illegitimate cousin from St. Petersburg. A woman of highly questionable reputation, seen from Charles' point of view. Charles agrees to meet with Lili that same night at the Oyster Bed Café, located down by the docks. Charles brings Zolotov and Bellows to the restaurant, and demands that Lili leave town never to return - he doesn't wish to be associated with the kind of woman she is. Feeling threatened, Lili decides to leave, but before she does she bumps into Robert Latour. Robert opens his heart to Lili and tells her he is in love with Claire, and has been since he first met with her. Charles finds Lili and Robert talking, and promises to settle Robert's loan debt if he takes Lili out of New Orleans. Robert agrees to this.

Robert passes by Claire's house and peers through the window, seeing Lili inside. He puts two and two together and realizes that Lili and Claire are the same person. He doesn't confront her, but tells what he has found out to Charles. They conspire to abduct Lili/Claire and hide her away on Robert's boat until the wedding. Once Robert arrives back to his boat with Claire, he sets her free and she decides to stay the night. The morning after Claire tells Robert that they will never see each other again.

The wedding is held as planned a day later, but when Claire sees Robert as one of the guests, she realizes that he is the one she loves and fakes fainting again. In the turmoil that follows, Claire disappears and is nowhere to be found. She sails away with Robert on his boat, and throws her wedding dress into the Mississippi river.[3]

Cast

Production

Development

The star was Marlene Dietrich who had revived her career at Universal appearing in Destry Rides Again (1939) produced by Joe Pasternak. In May 1940 Universal announced it would make two Dietrich films over the following year: Seven Sinners and The Countess of New Orleans. Both were to be among the studio's bigger budgeted productions.[4]

In October 1940 Universal announced the director of Countess would be Rene Clair, who had arrived in Lisbon from France in August. It was Clair's first Hollywood movie although he had directed two English-language films in England.[5] Dietrich later said Clair's hiring was Pastenak's idea and "at first I resisted, but finally out of loyalty to my old principle that doing your duty was all that mattered, I yielded."[6] Pasternak wrote in his memoirs that he suggested Clair, asked Dietrich "What do you say?" and she said "I think it'd be wonderful."Cite error: The <ref> tag has too many names (see the help page). However this did not happen. In December Universal said the film would now be called The Flame of New Orleans and star Andy Devine, Roland Young and Broderick Crawford alongside Dietrich.[7]

Bruce Cabot's casting was announced in January 1941.[8] "Bruce is all right but I don't think he's Dietrich calibre," wrote Hedda Hopper. "However I can be convinced. But I'll wait til the picture's finished."[9]

Shooting

Filming started 6 January 1941.[10] Dietrich and Cabot reportedly feuded during production.[11] She later called him "an awfully stupid actor, unable to remember his lines or cues. Nor could Clair, who didn’t speak a word of English, lend him a helping hand. Besides, Cabot was very conceited. He wouldn’t accept any help. I finally resigned myself to paying for his lessons, so that he would at least know his lines. The crew loathed Clair (surely because of the language barrier) to such an extent that the technicians almost pushed me off the set the moment they heard the order: “Pack up your things”."[6]

During filming the New York Times reported that the Hays Office were concerned about the movie, in part because Clair was French, and it starred Dietrich as a woman of ill repute in "a colorful city during the most colorful period of its career."[12] In particular, the Hays Office was worried about several specific scenes. Clair offered to shoot the scenes in two different ways so if the Hays Office objected Joe Pasternak would have an alternative.[12] Krasna was on set and reworked the script constantly with Clair in order to help it get past the censors.[13]

Krasna later said he felt that Marlene Dietrich could not play comedy and needed experienced comedic actors to play opposite her like Cary Grant and Adolphe Menjou; he thought Bruce Cabot and Roland Young were miscast. He also relates that the Hays Office insisted that two reels of the film be removed for censorship reasons.[14]

Reception

Critical

Hedda Hopper said the film was like "molasses in January... Clair's direction lacks the zip we demand... the flame simmered down to a slow burn."[15] The film received poor reviews on the whole.[16]

Pasternak wrote "the critics were, I thought, unfair to Rene. It is my firm conviction that if Clair had made this same picture in France and it had come over here with a French soundtrack and the usual subtitles, the critical ladies and gentlemen would have been talking about "Gallic wit," "the deft French touch," and "Latin sauci- ness." As it was, they jumped on us hard for trying to do something a little different. And— I'm sure unconsciously— they berated Rene Clair for making films in this country instead of France, not realizing that Rene had come here in search of that freedom which his pictures have always sung."[17]

Pasternak also felt "the critics were most cruel to" Dietrich "chiding her for being mannered again and all the rest of it. She thought she was spoofing her old self, but apparently the gentle satire was lost." Pasternak wrote "Marlene didn't mind" because the war was going badly for the Allies "and Marlene's heart was not entirely centered on making motion pictures. She was thinking about the war and her adopted country's imminent part in it. Myself, I was trying to get out of my contract with Universal."[17]

Box Office

Clair called the film "a big flop, and a great handicap in my American career. When I started in Hollywood, they were enthusiastic about welcoming people they knew in Europe. We really had great possibilities. But you know how Hollywood is. If they get too much on you and you fail, finish; that happened to me in Flame of New Orleans. Maybe it was a little too subtle for that time."[18]

Dietrich said the film "was a flop. I played a double role (sisters) and, as always, wore lavish costumes, but that wasn’t enough. I didn’t particularly like Rend Clair, but I didn’t hate him as much as the rest did."[6]

Pasternak wrote "I did not think it made the bookkeepers at Universal very happy."[17]

The box office disappointment of the movie, along with other Pasternak productions Nice Girl and A Little Bit of Heaven led to Universal being difficult with the budgets of Pasternak's movies - and contributed to the producer leaving Universal and going to MGM.[19]

Notes

  1. ^ Pasternak p 207
  2. ^ "NY Times: The Flame of New Orleans". NY Times. Retrieved 2008-12-13.
  3. ^ http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/75093/The-Flame-of-New-Orleans/
  4. ^ UNIVERSAL PLANS TO MAKE 59 FILMS New York Times 13 May 1940: 23.
  5. ^ SCREEN NEWS HERE AND IN HOLLYWOOD New York Times 1 Oct 1940: 34.
  6. ^ a b c McClelland, Doug (1989). Hollywood Talks Turkey - The Screen's Greatest Flops. Starbrite. p. 136-137.
  7. ^ NEWS OF THE SCREEN New York Times 23 Dec 1940: 25.
  8. ^ Warners Will End Suspension of George Raft and Star Him in 'Danger Zone' New York Times 3 Jan 1941: 13.
  9. ^ Hedda Hopper's HOLLYWOOD Los Angeles Times 6 Jan 1941: A14.
  10. ^ SCREEN NEWS HERE AND IN HOLLYWOOD New York Times 6 Jan 1941: 11.
  11. ^ Hedda Hopper's HOLLYWOOD Los Angeles Times 6 Apr 1941: C3.
  12. ^ a b Churchill, Douglas W. (19 Jan 1941). "ORSON WELLES SCARES HOLLYWOOD: His 'Citizen Kane' Draws the Fire of W.R. Hearst, and Thereby Hangs a Tale". New York Times. p. X5.
  13. ^ TOWN CALLED HOLLYWOOD Scheuer, Philip K. Los Angeles Times 26 Jan 1941: C3.
  14. ^ *McGilligan, Patrick, "Norman Krasna: The Woolworth's Touch", Backstory: Interviews with Screenwriters of Hollywood's Golden Age, University of California Press, 1986 p. 223
  15. ^ Hedda Hopper's HOLLYWOOD Los Angeles Times 26 Apr 1941: A9.
  16. ^ Dietrich's 'Flame' or Rene Clair's? Critics Fall Out Griffith, Richard. Los Angeles Times 6 May 1941: 12.
  17. ^ a b c Pasternak, Joe (1956). Easy the Hard Way. Putnam. p. 208.
  18. ^ McClelland, Doug (1989). Hollywood Talks Turkey - The Screen's Greatest Flops. Starbrite. p. 59-60.
  19. ^ Mr. Pasternak's Farewell to Universal -- Short Feature Production Begins By DOUGLAS W. CHURCHILL. New York Times15 June 1941: X3.

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Flame_of_New_Orleans&oldid=921515883"