Jump to content

European Union–NATO relations: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m stub sort
Line 10: Line 10:
===Tensions and mutual gains as EU gains autonomous defence structures===
===Tensions and mutual gains as EU gains autonomous defence structures===
{{Main|Berlin Plus agreement}}
{{Main|Berlin Plus agreement}}
Following the establishment of the ESDI and the St. Malo declaration, [[United States Secretary of State|US Secretary of State]] [[Madeleine Albright]] were among others who voiced concern that an independent European security pillar could undermine NATO, as she put forth the three famous D's:
{{Cquote
|text=Our [...] task is working together to develop [the ESDI] within [NATO], which the United States has strongly endorsed. We enthusiastically support any such measures that enhance European capabilities. The United States welcomes a more capable European partner, with modern, flexible military forces capable of putting out fires in Europe's own back yard and working with us through [NATO] to defend our common interests. The key to a successful initiative is to focus on practical military capabilities. Any initiative must avoid preempting [NATO] decision-making by <u>'''d'''</u>e-linking ESDI from NATO, avoid <u>'''d'''</u>uplicating existing efforts, and avoid <u>'''d'''</u>iscriminating against non-EU members. [...]
|author=[[United States Secretary of State|US Secretary of State]] [[Madeleine Albright|Albright]] |source= [[North Atlantic Council]] (8 December 1998)<ref>https://1997-2001.state.gov/statements/1998/981208.html</ref>
}}


==Present cooperation agreements==
==Present cooperation agreements==

Revision as of 22:10, 11 October 2019

European Union–NATO relations
Map indicating locations of European Union and NATO

European Union

NATO

The EU does not have a permanent military command structure similar to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's (NATO) Allied Command Operations (ACO), although it has been agreed that ACO resources may be used for the conduct of the EU's CSDP missions under the Berlin Plus agreement. The MPCC, established in 2017 and to be strengthened in 2020, does however represent the EU's first step in developing a permanent military OHQ. In parallel, the newly established European Defence Fund (EDF) marks the first time the EU budget is used to finance multinational defence projects.

History

Common origins, where NATO cannibalises intra-European initiatives

Tensions and mutual gains as EU gains autonomous defence structures

Following the establishment of the ESDI and the St. Malo declaration, US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright were among others who voiced concern that an independent European security pillar could undermine NATO, as she put forth the three famous D's:

Our [...] task is working together to develop [the ESDI] within [NATO], which the United States has strongly endorsed. We enthusiastically support any such measures that enhance European capabilities. The United States welcomes a more capable European partner, with modern, flexible military forces capable of putting out fires in Europe's own back yard and working with us through [NATO] to defend our common interests. The key to a successful initiative is to focus on practical military capabilities. Any initiative must avoid preempting [NATO] decision-making by de-linking ESDI from NATO, avoid duplicating existing efforts, and avoid discriminating against non-EU members. [...]

Present cooperation agreements

Comparison of command structures

European Union

The EU command and control (C2) structure is directed by political bodies composed of member states' representatives, and generally requires unanimous decisions. As of April 2019:[2]

Liaison:       Advice and recommendations       Support and monitoring       Preparatory work     
Political strategic level:[5]
ISSEUCO Pres. (EUCO)Chain of command
Coordination/support
SatCenCIVCOMHR/VP (FAC)
INTCENHR/VP (PMG)HR/VP (PSC)[6]

CEUMC (EUMC)
CMPD

DGEUMS[3] (EUMS)
Military/civilian strategic level:


Dir MPCC[3] (MPCC)
JSCCCiv OpCdr CPCC[1]
Operational level:
MFCdr[4] (MFHQ)HoM[1]
Tactical level:
CC[2] LandCC[2] AirCC[2] MarOther CCs[2]
ForcesForcesForcesForces


1 In the event of a CSDP Civilian Mission also being in the field, the relations with the Civilian Planning and Conduct Capability (CPCC) and its Civilian Operation Commander (Civ OpCdr), as well as the subordinate Head of Mission (HoM), are coordinated as shown.
2 Other Component Commanders (CCs) and service branches which may be established.
3 The MPCC is part of the EUMS and Dir MPCC is double-hatted as DGEUMS. Unless the MPCC is used as Operation Headquarters (OHQ), either a national OHQ offered by member states or the NATO Command Structure (NCS) would serve this purpose. In the latter instance, Deputy Supreme Allied Commander Europe (DSACEUR), rather than Dir MPCC, would serve as Operation Commander (OpCdr).
4 Unless the MPCC is used as Operation Headquarters (OHQ), the MFCdr would be known as a Force Commander (FCdr), and direct a Force Headquarters (FHQ) rather than a MFHQ. Whereas the MFHQ would act both on the operational and tactical level, the FHQ would act purely on the operational level.
5 The political strategic level is not part of the C2 structure per se, but represents the political bodies, with associated support facilities, that determine the missions' general direction. The Council determines the role of the High Representative (HR/VP), who serves as Vice-President of the European Commission, attends European Council meetings, chairs the Foreign Affairs Council (FAC) and may chair the Political and Security Committee (PSC) in times of crisis. The HR/VP proposes and implements CSDP decisions.
6 Same composition as Committee of Permanent Representatives (COREPER) II, which also prepares for the CSDP-related work of the FAC.

NATO

POLITICAL-STRATEGIC LEVEL:
North Atlantic Council
(NAC)
NATO Headquarters, Brussels, BEL
Secretary-General
(SECGEN)
NATO Headquarters, Brussels, BEL
International Staff
(IS)
NATO Headquarters, Brussels, BEL
MILITARY-STRATEGIC LEVEL:
International Military Staff
(IMS)
NATO Headquarters, Brussels, BEL

Military Committee
(MC)
NATO Headquarters, Brussels, BEL
STRATEGIC COMMANDS:

Supreme Allied Commander Transformation
Allied Command Transformation (ACT)
Norfolk, USA

Supreme Allied Commander Europe
Allied Command Operations (ACO)
Mons, BEL
TRANSFORMATION COMMANDS:
OPERATIONAL COMMANDS:
Joint Warfare Centre
(JWC)
Stavanger, NOR
Joint Force Command Brunssum
(JFC Brunssum)
Brunssum, NLD
Allied Air Command
(AIRCOM)
Ramstein, DEU
Joint Force Training Centre
(JFTC)
Bydgoszcz, POL
Joint Force Command Naples
(JFC Naples)
Naples, ITA
Allied Land Command
(LANDCOM)
İzmir, TUR
Joint Analysis and Lessons Learned Centre
(JALLC)
Lisbon, PRT
Joint Force Command Norfolk
(JFC Norfolk)
Norfolk, Virginia, USA
Allied Maritime Command
(MARCOM)
Northwood, GBR
Joint Support and Enabling Command
(JSEC)
Ulm, DEU


Partially overlapping memberships

  Non-European countries
  Transcontinental countries
Comparison of the two main Euro-Atlantic defence organisations
   European Union
(in respect of its defence arm, the Common Security and Defence Policy)
 NATO
Mutual defence clause Article 42.7 of the consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union:

"If a Member State is the victim of armed aggression on its territory, the other Member States shall have towards it an obligation of aid and assistance by all the means in their power, in accordance with Article 51 of the United Nations Charter. This shall not prejudice the specific character of the security and defence policy of certain Member States. [...]"

Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty:

"The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them [on their territory] shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area. [...]"

  Political strategic organisation
Highest office High Representative (HR/VP) Secretary General
Principal decision-making body Foreign Affairs Council North Atlantic Council
Liaison body European External Action Service International Staff
Seat Kortenberg building (Brussels, Belgium) NATO headquarters (Brussels, Belgium)
  Military strategic organisation
Supreme commander Director of the Military Planning and Conduct Capability Supreme Allied Commander Europe
Headquarters Military Planning and Conduct Capability (Brussels, Belgium) Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (Mons, Belgium)
Chair of chiefs of defence assembly Chairman of the European Union Military Committee Chair of the NATO Military Committee
Chiefs of defence assembly European Union Military Committee NATO Military Committee
Advisory body European Union Military Staff International Military Staff
  Membership Permanent Structured Cooperation Membership
Member states of both the EU and NATO
 Belgium Founder Founder Founder
 Bulgaria 2007 Founder 2004
 Croatia 2013 Founder 2009
 Czech Republic 2004 Founder 1999
 Denmark 1973 2023 Founder
 Estonia 2004 Founder 2004
 Finland 1995 Founder 2023
 France Founder Founder Founder
 Germany Founder Founder 1955
 Greece 1981 Founder 1952
 Hungary 2004 Founder 1999
 Italy Founder Founder Founder
 Latvia 2004 Founder 2004
 Lithuania 2004 Founder 2004
 Luxembourg Founder Founder Founder
 Netherlands Founder Founder Founder
 Poland 2004 Founder 1999
 Portugal 1986 Founder Founder
 Romania 2007 Founder 2004
 Slovakia 2004 Founder 2004
 Slovenia 2004 Founder 2004
 Spain 1986 Founder 1982
 Sweden 1995 Founder 2024
Non-NATO EU member states
 Austria 1995 Founder Partnership for Peace
 Cyprus  2004 Founder No
 Ireland 1973 Founder Partnership for Peace
 Malta 2004 No Partnership for Peace
Non-EU NATO member states
 Albania Candidate 2009
 Iceland No Founder
 Montenegro Candidate 2017
 North Macedonia Candidate 2020
 Norway Defence Agency agreement Founder
 Turkey  Candidate 1952
 United Kingdom No Founder
European countries outside both the EU and NATO
 Andorra  No No
 Armenia  No Individual Partnership Action Plan
 Azerbaijan  No Individual Partnership Action Plan
 Belarus No Partnership for Peace
 Bosnia and Herzegovina Candidate Membership Action Plan
 Georgia  Candidate Intensified Dialogue
 Kazakhstan  No Individual Partnership Action Plan
 Kosovo Applicant / Potential candidate No
 Liechtenstein  No No
 Moldova Candidate Individual Partnership Action Plan
 Monaco  No No
 Russia  No Partnership for Peace
 San Marino  No No
 Serbia Candidate Individual Partnership Action Plan
  Switzerland Defence Agency agreement Partnership for Peace
 Ukraine Candidate Intensified Dialogue
 Vatican City  No No
NATO member states located in North America, which are therefore ineligible for EU membership
 Canada Founder
 United States Founder
Members of NATO's Partnership for Peace located outside Europe, which are therefore neither eligible for EU nor NATO membership
 Kyrgyzstan Partnership for Peace
 Tajikistan Partnership for Peace
 Turkmenistan Partnership for Peace
 Uzbekistan Partnership for Peace

See also