User talk:Doug Weller: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
Line 68: Line 68:
== Requested merge - needs an admin to execute ==
== Requested merge - needs an admin to execute ==


Doug, back in May there was a discussion at [[Talk:Alexander the Great in the Quran]] which seems to have resulted in a consensus that that article should be merged into [[Dhul-Qarnayn]], with some indications that the article [[Cyrus the Great in the Quran]] should be similarly treated. (Both Alex and Cyrus articles look like pov forks to me, no doubt with a deep history). [[User:Mathglot]] suggested this towards the end of the discussion but didn't action it because he was involved in the discussion - and in fact no one actioned it. A user called [[User:AhmadF.Cheema]] objects to this, but he's currently in an edit war with me and seems not to understand Wikipedia policy at all - he wants to treat traditional Islamic scholars as RS, which they are not. Anyway, if you don't fear getting involved, you might like to contact Mathglot (is he an admin?) with a view to actioning this. And as for me, I really, really want to get out of Wikipedia.
Doug, back in May there was a discussion at [[Talk:Alexander the Great in the Quran]] which seems to have resulted in a consensus that that article should be merged into [[Dhul-Qarnayn]], with some indications that the article [[Cyrus the Great in the Quran]] should be similarly treated. (Both Alex and Cyrus articles look like pov forks to me, no doubt with a deep history). [[User:Mathglot]] suggested this towards the end of the discussion but didn't action it because he was involved in the discussion - and in fact no one actioned it. A user called [[User:AhmadF.Cheema]] objects to this, but he's currently in an edit war with me and seems not to understand Wikipedia policy at all - he wants to treat traditional Islamic scholars as RS, which they are not. Anyway, if you don't fear getting involved, you might like to contact Mathglot (is he an admin?) with a view to actioning this. And as for me, I really, really want to get out of Wikipedia. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/121.45.209.79|121.45.209.79]] ([[User talk:121.45.209.79#top|talk]]) 05:02, 23 July 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 05:03, 23 July 2019

The current date and time is 3 June 2024 T 02:05 UTC. You can email me from this link but in the interests of Wiki-transparency, please message me on this page unless there are pressing reasons to do otherwise. Comments which I find to be uncivil, full of vulgarities, flame baiting, or that are excessively rude may be deleted without response. If I choose not to answer, that's my right; don't keep putting it back. I'll just delete and get annoyed at you.

User:Doug Weller
User:Doug Weller
User talk:Doug Weller
User talk:Doug Weller
User:Doug Weller/Workshop
User:Doug Weller/Workshop
Special:Prefixindex/User:Doug Weller
Special:Prefixindex/User:Doug Weller
User:Doug Weller/Userboxes
User:Doug Weller/Userboxes
Special:Contributions/Doug Weller
Special:Contributions/Doug Weller
Special:Emailuser/Doug Weller
Special:Emailuser/Doug Weller







Notice Coming here to ask why I reverted your edit? Read this page first...
Welcome to my talk page! I am an administrator here on Wikipedia. That means I am here to help. It does not mean that I have any special status or something, it just means that I get to push a few extra buttons to help maintain this encyclopedia.

If you need help with something, feel free to ask. Click here to start a new topic.
If I have not made any edits in a while, (check) you may get a faster response by posting your request in a more centralized place.



Edit on Sagar S

The fact that Sagar S has done 2000 recordings has clearly been cited on an official media report [1] cinecircle.com which is considered as the most popular and important online entertainment media page. Why arent u allowing that to be added? Prakashlyrics (talk) 16:10, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

Mail

Hello, Doug Weller. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 18:30, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Translated artciles

Hello DW. I have translated this article from de.wikipeda. There are additional sources and contents though. Is there a specific tag indicating that an article has been translated from x.wiki? Puduḫepa 09:09, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page gnome)@Puduḫepa: {{Translated page}} may be what you are looking for. If it's too much trouble, as long as there's a clear enough message on the talk page about the origins, this is sufficient for copyright attribution. I hope this helps, —PaleoNeonate – 23:34, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, @PaleoNeonate:. If I understand correctly, the template should not be on the mainspace but on the talk page? Puduḫepa 06:21, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Puduḫepa: absolutely. You're welcome, —PaleoNeonate – 06:52, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Duck-sock

Hi Doug. Thanks for your help on a recent SPI case. You suggested that article protection could be used. This would be quite useful, as this user jumps from IP range on a very regular basis. Their latest target is this article, a tournament that starts tomorrow. Would it be possible to protect this for the next few days, ideally for a week? No worries if not. Thanks again. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 16:18, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For your work on the Williamson-thing(s). Perhaps I should have seen that coming, but I didn't. If it goes no further I see no personal problems. I guess I'll notice if it happens. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:06, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gråbergs Gråa Sång: do let me know, by email if more appropriate. I've got reason to worry though about the Admin he targeted. Doug Weller talk 19:10, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Will do. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:13, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The article is better now though. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 06:21, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User refusing to gain consensus for their edits

Hi again. I reverted a user over at Antifa (United States) telling them to gain consensus for their edits in the talk page first, since they drastically changed the lede and other parts of the article, and they refused to do so. Can you please do something about this? Thanks, QuestFour (talk) 00:06, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fort Ancient Culture dating system

Hey, thanks for making the changes back to what the article was originally using. Someone else other than me had originally changed the headings on the various section fro CE to AD, I just changed the body to match, not knowing that the headings had recently been changed. I just want to match the manual of style and have them all be the same on an individual article. And whoever did change the headings likely is doing so elsewhere, rather haphazardly, without even changing the articles actual text. So I would advise you to look in on what he is doing, since neither of us want that, or articles to be changed from their original dating systems.NDV135 (talk) 08:17, 22 July 2019 (UTC)NDV135[reply]

This doesn't make sense

I don't understand why you changed "in order" to "out of order" here [1]. Also, you can't change your post after multiple people had already agreed with you below that a block is in order. Please go back and WP:REDACT properly -- striking old text and re-dating with ";edited ~~~~~" and hopefully adding an explanation for your change. Also fix the user link that's missing the closing brackets. Why is a block out of order if a ban is in order? Does not make sense. Thanks. Softlavender (talk) 08:23, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested merge - needs an admin to execute

Doug, back in May there was a discussion at Talk:Alexander the Great in the Quran which seems to have resulted in a consensus that that article should be merged into Dhul-Qarnayn, with some indications that the article Cyrus the Great in the Quran should be similarly treated. (Both Alex and Cyrus articles look like pov forks to me, no doubt with a deep history). User:Mathglot suggested this towards the end of the discussion but didn't action it because he was involved in the discussion - and in fact no one actioned it. A user called User:AhmadF.Cheema objects to this, but he's currently in an edit war with me and seems not to understand Wikipedia policy at all - he wants to treat traditional Islamic scholars as RS, which they are not. Anyway, if you don't fear getting involved, you might like to contact Mathglot (is he an admin?) with a view to actioning this. And as for me, I really, really want to get out of Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.209.79 (talk) 05:02, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]