Jump to content

Jay–Gardoqui Treaty: Difference between revisions

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎top: it covers the United States, Spain, France and Britain – the major powers in the in the world
→‎top: Spanish American trade issues
Line 1: Line 1:


The '''Jay–Gardoqui Treaty''' (also known as the '''Liberty Treaty with Spain''') of 1786 between the United States and Spain was not ratified. It would have guaranteed Spanish exclusive right to navigate the [[Mississippi River]] for 25 years.<ref name="TreatyDate">{{Citation | accessdate = 11 June 2018 |last=Yoo |first=John | year=2005 | location = Chicago | publisher = University of Chicago Press | title = The Powers of War and Peace : The Constitution and Foreign Affairs After 9/11 | quote = From 1785 to 1786, [[John Jay]], as secretary for foreign affairs, negotiated with Spain concerning various boundary disputes with Spain’s North American territories. Chief among these issues was the right of American settlers to navigate the southern reaches of the Mississippi River, which passed through Spanish territory on its way to the sea. Spain had closed its portion of the Mississippi to American commerce in 1784; Congress specifically instructed Jay that any treaty with Spain had to win back that right. Spain’s ambassador, [[Don Diego de Gardoqui]], refused to accede to this demand out of Spanish fears of America’s westward expansion. | url = https://adams.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=260261&site=eds-live&scope=site | page=77}}</ref> It also opened Spain's [[Europe]]an and [[Caribbean|West Indian]] [[seaport]]s to American [[shipping]]. However, the Treaty was not ratified under the [[Articles of Confederation]].
The '''Jay–Gardoqui Treaty''' (also known as the '''Liberty Treaty with Spain''') of 1786 between the United States and Spain was not ratified. It would have guaranteed Spanish exclusive right to navigate the [[Mississippi River]] for 25 years.<ref name="TreatyDate">{{Citation | accessdate = 11 June 2018 |last=Yoo |first=John | year=2005 | location = Chicago | publisher = University of Chicago Press | title = The Powers of War and Peace : The Constitution and Foreign Affairs After 9/11 | quote = From 1785 to 1786, [[John Jay]], as secretary for foreign affairs, negotiated with Spain concerning various boundary disputes with Spain’s North American territories. Chief among these issues was the right of American settlers to navigate the southern reaches of the Mississippi River, which passed through Spanish territory on its way to the sea. Spain had closed its portion of the Mississippi to American commerce in 1784; Congress specifically instructed Jay that any treaty with Spain had to win back that right. Spain’s ambassador, [[Don Diego de Gardoqui]], refused to accede to this demand out of Spanish fears of America’s westward expansion. | url = https://adams.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=260261&site=eds-live&scope=site | page=77}}</ref> It also opened Spain's [[Europe]]an and [[Caribbean|West Indian]] [[seaport]]s to American [[shipping]]. However, the Treaty was rejected by the Continental Congress.


American foreign-policy was confused, with a weak central government, and the 13 states each having their own policies on trade and tariffs. European powers looked at the new nation is a weakling,, and tried to run roughshod over it. American nationalists realized the problem, and use the weakness in dealing with foreign powers as a reason to install a new constitution in 1789.<ref>Lawrence S. Kaplan, ''Colonies into Nation: American Diplomacy 1763 – 1801 (1972) pp 145-81</ref> Spain had numerous schemes to keep the new nation we, including closing the Mississippi River to its traffic, and forming alliances with Indian tribes along its southern border. On the other hand, Spanish merchants welcomed trade with the new nation, which had been impossible when it was a British colony. it therefore encourage the United States to set up consulates in Spain's New World colonies<ref>Roy F. Nichols, "Trade Relations and the Establishment of the United States Consulates in Spanish America, 1779-1809." ''The Hispanic American Historical Review'' 13.3 (1933): 289-313.</ref> American merchants and Eastern cities likewise wanted to open trade with the Spanish colonies which had been forbidden before 1775. <ref>Arthur P. Whitaker, "Reed and Forde: Merchant Adventurers of Philadelphia: Their Trade with Spanish New Orleans." ''Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography'' 61.3 (1937): 237-262. [https://journals.psu.edu/pmhb/article/download/29406/29161 online] </ref> a new line
Congress commanded so little, and had so little power over the states of the Union and therefore over foreign policy, that other nations either ignored the young United States or ran roughshod over its interests with little fear of retaliation. The British ignored certain provisions of the Paris agreement and kept troops on American soil long after the peace treaty and American debtors were refusing to pay British creditors, as also required by the [[Treaty of Paris (1783)|Treaty of Paris]]. American state courts generally refused suits by British plaintiffs, and there were no federal courts under the Articles.<ref>McDonald, Forrest, ''We the People: The Economic Origins of the Constitution'', Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1958, ''passim''.</ref>
of commerce involved American merchants importing goods from Britain, and then reselling them to the Spanish colonies. <ref>Javier Cuenca-Esteban, "British 'Ghost' Exports, American Middlemen, and the Trade to Spanish America, 1790–1819: A Speculative Reconstruction." ''William & Mary Quarterly'' 71.1 (2014): 63-98. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5309/willmaryquar.71.1.0063 online]</ref>


When Spain closed the port of New Orleans to American commerce in 1784, Congress sent [[John Jay]] to Madrid to achieve terms to open the Mississippi to Americans. Gardoqui, however, arrived in New York in June 1785 and Spanish-American treaty negotiations began that soon after.<ref name="GardoquiLetters">{{Citation | last1=Robertson | first1=James Alexander | title=List of Documents in Spanish Archives relating to the History of the United States which have been Printed or of which Transcripts are Preserved in American Libraries | publisher=Carnegie Institution of Washington | place= Washington, D.C. | volume= | edition= | year=1910 | quote=June 30 [1785]. New York. Gardoqui to Floridablanca (confidential no I) | page=195 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1vpZAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA195#v=onepage&q&f=false}}</ref> A year's worth of diplomacy resulted in the ambassadors signing an agreement that ignored the problem of the Mississippi in exchange for commercial advantages benefiting the Northeast (the Jay–Gardoqui Treaty). Congress rejected the treaty, and the issue smoldered for ten more years. Congress also claimed lands in the west still occupied by the British and Spaniards, but could not forcefully challenge those nations for control of the land.
When Spain closed the port of New Orleans to American commerce in 1784, Congress sent [[John Jay]] to Madrid to achieve terms to open the Mississippi to Americans. Gardoqui, however, arrived in New York in June 1785 and Spanish-American treaty negotiations began that soon after.<ref name="GardoquiLetters">{{Citation | last1=Robertson | first1=James Alexander | title=List of Documents in Spanish Archives relating to the History of the United States which have been Printed or of which Transcripts are Preserved in American Libraries | publisher=Carnegie Institution of Washington | place= Washington, D.C. | volume= | edition= | year=1910 | quote=June 30 [1785]. New York. Gardoqui to Floridablanca (confidential no I) | page=195 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1vpZAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA195#v=onepage&q&f=false}}</ref> A year's worth of diplomacy resulted in the ambassadors signing an agreement that ignored the problem of the Mississippi in exchange for commercial advantages benefiting the Northeast (the Jay–Gardoqui Treaty). Congress rejected the treaty, and the issue smoldered for ten more years. Congress also claimed lands in the west still occupied by the British and Spaniards, but could not forcefully challenge those nations for control of the land.

Revision as of 12:24, 27 May 2019

The Jay–Gardoqui Treaty (also known as the Liberty Treaty with Spain) of 1786 between the United States and Spain was not ratified. It would have guaranteed Spanish exclusive right to navigate the Mississippi River for 25 years.[1] It also opened Spain's European and West Indian seaports to American shipping. However, the Treaty was rejected by the Continental Congress.

American foreign-policy was confused, with a weak central government, and the 13 states each having their own policies on trade and tariffs. European powers looked at the new nation is a weakling,, and tried to run roughshod over it. American nationalists realized the problem, and use the weakness in dealing with foreign powers as a reason to install a new constitution in 1789.[2] Spain had numerous schemes to keep the new nation we, including closing the Mississippi River to its traffic, and forming alliances with Indian tribes along its southern border. On the other hand, Spanish merchants welcomed trade with the new nation, which had been impossible when it was a British colony. it therefore encourage the United States to set up consulates in Spain's New World colonies[3] American merchants and Eastern cities likewise wanted to open trade with the Spanish colonies which had been forbidden before 1775. [4] a new line of commerce involved American merchants importing goods from Britain, and then reselling them to the Spanish colonies. [5]

When Spain closed the port of New Orleans to American commerce in 1784, Congress sent John Jay to Madrid to achieve terms to open the Mississippi to Americans. Gardoqui, however, arrived in New York in June 1785 and Spanish-American treaty negotiations began that soon after.[6] A year's worth of diplomacy resulted in the ambassadors signing an agreement that ignored the problem of the Mississippi in exchange for commercial advantages benefiting the Northeast (the Jay–Gardoqui Treaty). Congress rejected the treaty, and the issue smoldered for ten more years. Congress also claimed lands in the west still occupied by the British and Spaniards, but could not forcefully challenge those nations for control of the land.

The American armed forces, except for state militias, over which Congress had little control, were for all practical purposes disbanded after the war. (The U.S. Army numbered less than 100 men in 1784.)[citation needed] For good or ill, foreign affairs would come to dominate American public life and politics between 1790 and 1815—as Europe became steeped in the wars of the French Revolution and Empire. However, even in the immediate postwar years, America carried little weight in the world despite having successfully gained its independence during the American Revolutionary War.

United States' problems with Great Britain and Spain:[citation needed]

  • Boundaries: The British refused to abandon forts in Northwest.
  • The Royal Navy remains in American Waters, a threat to American independence of action.
  • The issue of unpaid debts persisted, though some thought they should be renounced (George Mason: "What were we fighting for?").
  • The Port of New Orleans and the Mississippi River were closed to Americans, being territory of Spain restored to her by the Treaties of 1783.
  • The Spanish and British were also suspected of riling up the Indians against settlers in the west.
  • The Confederation Government lacked power and authority and was unable to pass a treaty with Spain over the Florida boundary, etc.

See also

References

  1. ^ Yoo, John (2005), The Powers of War and Peace : The Constitution and Foreign Affairs After 9/11, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, p. 77, retrieved 11 June 2018, From 1785 to 1786, John Jay, as secretary for foreign affairs, negotiated with Spain concerning various boundary disputes with Spain's North American territories. Chief among these issues was the right of American settlers to navigate the southern reaches of the Mississippi River, which passed through Spanish territory on its way to the sea. Spain had closed its portion of the Mississippi to American commerce in 1784; Congress specifically instructed Jay that any treaty with Spain had to win back that right. Spain's ambassador, Don Diego de Gardoqui, refused to accede to this demand out of Spanish fears of America's westward expansion.
  2. ^ Lawrence S. Kaplan, Colonies into Nation: American Diplomacy 1763 – 1801 (1972) pp 145-81
  3. ^ Roy F. Nichols, "Trade Relations and the Establishment of the United States Consulates in Spanish America, 1779-1809." The Hispanic American Historical Review 13.3 (1933): 289-313.
  4. ^ Arthur P. Whitaker, "Reed and Forde: Merchant Adventurers of Philadelphia: Their Trade with Spanish New Orleans." Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography 61.3 (1937): 237-262. online
  5. ^ Javier Cuenca-Esteban, "British 'Ghost' Exports, American Middlemen, and the Trade to Spanish America, 1790–1819: A Speculative Reconstruction." William & Mary Quarterly 71.1 (2014): 63-98. online
  6. ^ Robertson, James Alexander (1910), List of Documents in Spanish Archives relating to the History of the United States which have been Printed or of which Transcripts are Preserved in American Libraries, Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Institution of Washington, p. 195, June 30 [1785]. New York. Gardoqui to Floridablanca (confidential no I)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jay–Gardoqui_Treaty&oldid=899028739"