Talk:Caryn Marooney: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
I am an experienced Wikipedia editor but have a conflict of interest on this article because I am a paid consultant to the Outcast Agency, a communications firm employed by Facebook. [[User:BC1278|BC1278]] ([[User talk:BC1278|talk]]) 21:35, 7 December 2017 (UTC)BC1278 |
I am an experienced Wikipedia editor but have a conflict of interest on this article because I am a paid consultant to the Outcast Agency, a communications firm employed by Facebook. [[User:BC1278|BC1278]] ([[User talk:BC1278|talk]]) 21:35, 7 December 2017 (UTC)BC1278 |
||
:: good job... checking < Pages that link to "Caryn Marooney" > there is a bunch of unrelevant guy who works for Facebook.. good karma marketing :P [[Special:Contributions/79.32.40.247|79.32.40.247]] ([[User talk:79.32.40.247|talk]]) 22:42, 15 March 2019 (UTC) |
:: good job... checking < Pages that link to "Caryn Marooney" > there is a bunch of unrelevant guy who works for Facebook.. good karma marketing :P [[Special:Contributions/79.32.40.247|79.32.40.247]] ([[User talk:79.32.40.247|talk]]) 22:42, 15 March 2019 (UTC) |
||
== Request Edit -- Remove Contentious Material re: BLP == |
|||
{{Request Edit}} |
|||
Hi, |
|||
I had a disclosed [[WP: COI]] for this article, but I am not being paid for this. |
|||
'''Remove:''' |
|||
"In March 2019, [[HuffPost]] reported that Facebook hired Ed Sussman, a "paid [[Wikipedia community|Wikpedia editor]]," to allegedly "create" the [[Wikipedia]] page for Marooney. HuffPost alleged that this effort took Sussman "over a year", and that he had gotten around Wikipedia's rules regarding paid editing by replying to "nearly every single bit of pushback with walls of text arguing his case," which HuffPost claims discourages Wikipedia editors from "dealing with Sussman’s arguments," allowing him to usually "get his way."<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/wikipedia-paid-editing-pr-facebook-nbc-axios_n_5c63321be4b03de942967225|title=Facebook, Axios And NBC Paid This Guy To Whitewash Wikipedia Pages|last=Feinberg|first=Ashley|date=March 14, 2019|work=Huffington Post|access-date=March 15, 2019|language=en-US}}</ref>" |
|||
'''Why?''' |
|||
1. [[WP: Coatrack]] Discussion of Wikipedia policy in the media is not relevant to the bio of the subject of this article. Most of this paragraph is about Sussman (me), not Malrooney. The editor could try [[Wikipedia]] and see how it flies. |
|||
2. ''Administrative Noticeboard has already reviewed this HuffPo article in-depth and found it to be an unreliable source:'' [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#HuffPost_article_on_WP_COI_editing] "The article itself seems to quietly concede that he doesn't actually violate any policies. In fact, it comes across as extremely misleading and obviously written by someone who doesn't understand Wikipedia at all. He "spent over a year lobbying" for the creation of Caryn Marooney? Come on, he created it as a draft and got it approved through the AfC process, not because he's some relentless lobbyist... This article seems to be little more than an unfortunate piece of trumped-up clickbaity garbage, and I actually feel bad for the paid editor here. I hope both the editor and the Foundation will push back in some way." This is from the admin [[User: Swarm]], and was concurred with by [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]]. No one disputes in this string disputes these the AN investigative findings. |
|||
3. ''Factually inaccurate summary.'' None of the following section (poorly summarizing HuffPo) refers to the Maroonet article: "...and that he had gotten around Wikipedia's rules regarding paid editing by replying to "nearly every single bit of pushback with walls of text arguing his case," which HuffPost claims discourages Wikipedia editors from "dealing with Sussman’s arguments," allowing him to usually "get his way." |
|||
Aside from the inaccurate attribution of this accusation to this article, it is self-evident, by this Talk page, that there is no "pushback" or "wall of text" leading to its approval. The exact [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Caryn_Marooney&diff=816624715&oldid=816624452 dif] showing the approval shows barely any discussion. |
|||
4. ''Contentious material alleging violation of the law.'' As Wikipedia warns in [[WP: COI]], covert editing potentially violates FTC law, and is certainly a serious violation of Wikipedia policy. [[WP: COI]]. Sussman disputes any wrongdoing in the article: "Everything he does is aboveboard." As per BLP policy, weakly sourced contentious material should be removed immediately. |
|||
5. Article is also inaccurate in alleging a declared paid editor using AfC can "create" an article in mainspace. Only a reviewing volunteer editor can move a proposed draft to mainspace, as is evident by the above dif above. |
|||
6. Undermines [[WP: COI]] and [[WP: Paid Editing]]. Official policy of Wikipedia is to encourage editors with a COI to disclose and to post to Talk or AfC. Inserting discussion of WP: COI and WP: PAID into a BLP is a great way to undermine anyone ever wanting to abide by these policies. Again, this is a matter for [[WP: AN]], if the editor of this section wishes to report me for more invesigation, and/or for the [[Wikipedia]] article. [[User:BC1278|BC1278]] ([[User talk:BC1278|talk]]) 22:44, 17 March 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:44, 17 March 2019
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | Biography Redirect‑class | ||||||
|
![]() | United States Redirect‑class | ||||||
|
![]() | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. |
![]() | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
![]() | This talk page has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
I am an experienced Wikipedia editor but have a conflict of interest on this article because I am a paid consultant to the Outcast Agency, a communications firm employed by Facebook. BC1278 (talk) 21:35, 7 December 2017 (UTC)BC1278
- good job... checking < Pages that link to "Caryn Marooney" > there is a bunch of unrelevant guy who works for Facebook.. good karma marketing :P 79.32.40.247 (talk) 22:42, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Request Edit -- Remove Contentious Material re: BLP
![]() | It is requested that an edit be made to the fully protected redirect at Caryn Marooney. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, so that an editor unfamiliar with the subject matter could complete the requested edit immediately.
Edit requests to fully protected pages should only be used for edits that are either uncontroversial or supported by consensus. If the proposed edit might be controversial, discuss it on the protected page's talk page before using this template. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request. When the request has been completed or denied, please add the |
Hi,
I had a disclosed WP: COI for this article, but I am not being paid for this.
Remove:
"In March 2019, HuffPost reported that Facebook hired Ed Sussman, a "paid Wikpedia editor," to allegedly "create" the Wikipedia page for Marooney. HuffPost alleged that this effort took Sussman "over a year", and that he had gotten around Wikipedia's rules regarding paid editing by replying to "nearly every single bit of pushback with walls of text arguing his case," which HuffPost claims discourages Wikipedia editors from "dealing with Sussman’s arguments," allowing him to usually "get his way."[1]"
Why?
1. WP: Coatrack Discussion of Wikipedia policy in the media is not relevant to the bio of the subject of this article. Most of this paragraph is about Sussman (me), not Malrooney. The editor could try Wikipedia and see how it flies.
2. Administrative Noticeboard has already reviewed this HuffPo article in-depth and found it to be an unreliable source: [1] "The article itself seems to quietly concede that he doesn't actually violate any policies. In fact, it comes across as extremely misleading and obviously written by someone who doesn't understand Wikipedia at all. He "spent over a year lobbying" for the creation of Caryn Marooney? Come on, he created it as a draft and got it approved through the AfC process, not because he's some relentless lobbyist... This article seems to be little more than an unfortunate piece of trumped-up clickbaity garbage, and I actually feel bad for the paid editor here. I hope both the editor and the Foundation will push back in some way." This is from the admin User: Swarm, and was concurred with by Barkeep49. No one disputes in this string disputes these the AN investigative findings.
3. Factually inaccurate summary. None of the following section (poorly summarizing HuffPo) refers to the Maroonet article: "...and that he had gotten around Wikipedia's rules regarding paid editing by replying to "nearly every single bit of pushback with walls of text arguing his case," which HuffPost claims discourages Wikipedia editors from "dealing with Sussman’s arguments," allowing him to usually "get his way."
Aside from the inaccurate attribution of this accusation to this article, it is self-evident, by this Talk page, that there is no "pushback" or "wall of text" leading to its approval. The exact dif showing the approval shows barely any discussion.
4. Contentious material alleging violation of the law. As Wikipedia warns in WP: COI, covert editing potentially violates FTC law, and is certainly a serious violation of Wikipedia policy. WP: COI. Sussman disputes any wrongdoing in the article: "Everything he does is aboveboard." As per BLP policy, weakly sourced contentious material should be removed immediately.
5. Article is also inaccurate in alleging a declared paid editor using AfC can "create" an article in mainspace. Only a reviewing volunteer editor can move a proposed draft to mainspace, as is evident by the above dif above.
6. Undermines WP: COI and WP: Paid Editing. Official policy of Wikipedia is to encourage editors with a COI to disclose and to post to Talk or AfC. Inserting discussion of WP: COI and WP: PAID into a BLP is a great way to undermine anyone ever wanting to abide by these policies. Again, this is a matter for WP: AN, if the editor of this section wishes to report me for more invesigation, and/or for the Wikipedia article. BC1278 (talk) 22:44, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
- ^ Feinberg, Ashley (March 14, 2019). "Facebook, Axios And NBC Paid This Guy To Whitewash Wikipedia Pages". Huffington Post. Retrieved March 15, 2019.
- Biography articles of living people
- Redirect-Class biography articles
- Redirect-Class United States articles
- NA-importance United States articles
- Redirect-Class United States articles of NA-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press
- Wikipedia fully protected edit requests
- Wikipedia edit requests possibly using incorrect templates