Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Mishmar HaEmek/1: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit
Line 9: Line 9:
*'''Comment''': I (the original GA nominater) will be home only in two weeks. So either someone take upon himself to fix the issue, or just remove the GA status until I'll have a computer.--[[User:Bolter21|'''Bolter21''']] <small>''([[User talk:Bolter21|talk to me]])''</small> 21:49, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
*'''Comment''': I (the original GA nominater) will be home only in two weeks. So either someone take upon himself to fix the issue, or just remove the GA status until I'll have a computer.--[[User:Bolter21|'''Bolter21''']] <small>''([[User talk:Bolter21|talk to me]])''</small> 21:49, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
**@[[User:Bolter21|Bolter21]]: Do you have time to have a look at this? [[User:TheDragonFire|TheDragonFire]] ([[User talk:TheDragonFire|talk]]) 12:54, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
**@[[User:Bolter21|Bolter21]]: Do you have time to have a look at this? [[User:TheDragonFire|TheDragonFire]] ([[User talk:TheDragonFire|talk]]) 12:54, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
***I'll be home next friday. Until then I am available through phobe app.--[[Special:Contributions/2.53.27.173|2.53.27.173]] ([[User talk:2.53.27.173|talk]]) 16:07, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
***I'll be home next friday. Until then I am available through the phone app.--[[User:Bolter21|'''Bolter21''']] <small>''([[User talk:Bolter21|talk to me]])''</small> 16:09, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:09, 22 April 2018

Mishmar HaEmek

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result pending

I'm opening this GAR due to issues with close paraphrasing and sourcing. See some examples in the DYK nom. Some of the issues have been fixed, but given the extent I think a GAR is warranted. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:02, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment from reviewer Looks like I dropped the ball on this one. I find it particularly worrying that the lead was copied as during the review I asked for it to be expanded and it is relatively easy to do so from the actual article itself. I am more than experienced as a reviewers and should have picked this up myself. Apologies for inconveniencing everyone. AIRcorn (talk) 17:56, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I (the original GA nominater) will be home only in two weeks. So either someone take upon himself to fix the issue, or just remove the GA status until I'll have a computer.--Bolter21 (talk to me) 21:49, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]