Jump to content

Lam government: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 352: Line 352:
The proposed "co-location arrangement" of the [[Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail Link]] has sparked concerns that it might constitute a breach of the [[Hong Kong Basic Law]] and undermine Hong Kong's autonomy of "one country, two systems", participially with immigration control. Under the arrangement, mainland customs officers will be allowed to set up checkpoints and exercise jurisdiction at the [[West Kowloon Station]].<ref name=ejinsight20151205>{{cite web|url=http://www.ejinsight.com/20151205-why-we-shouldnt-stick-to-the-colocation-system/|title=Why we shouldn’t stick to the co-location arrangement|work=EJ Insight}}</ref>
The proposed "co-location arrangement" of the [[Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail Link]] has sparked concerns that it might constitute a breach of the [[Hong Kong Basic Law]] and undermine Hong Kong's autonomy of "one country, two systems", participially with immigration control. Under the arrangement, mainland customs officers will be allowed to set up checkpoints and exercise jurisdiction at the [[West Kowloon Station]].<ref name=ejinsight20151205>{{cite web|url=http://www.ejinsight.com/20151205-why-we-shouldnt-stick-to-the-colocation-system/|title=Why we shouldn’t stick to the co-location arrangement|work=EJ Insight}}</ref>


On 28 December 2017, The [[Hong Kong Bar Association]] criticised the arrangement for distortion of the Basic Law, stating it damages the rule of law in Hong Kong as Article 18 was clearly written and leaves no room for any interpretation which would allow Chinese law to apply in any certain part of HKSAR. Since there is no legal basis, confidence in the "one country, two systems" principle will decline.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/12/28/beijings-distortion-hong-kong-basic-law-greatly-undermines-rule-law-legal-experts-warn/|title=Beijing’s ‘distortion’ of Hong Kong Basic Law greatly undermines rule of law, legal experts warn|work=Hong Kong Free Press|date=28 December 2017}}</ref> The Hong Kong government has defended the co-location agreement, stating that rule of law isn't damaged nor does undermine the Basic Law.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/12/29/govt-advisor-ronny-tong-beijings-joint-checkpoint-justification-not-harm-rule-law/|title=Gov’t advisor Ronny Tong: Beijing’s joint checkpoint justification does not harm rule of law|date=29 December 2017|work=Hong Kong Free Press}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/regional/2018-01/08/content_35457067.htm|title=Prescribed boundaries ensure joint checkpoint's legitimacy|newspaper=China Daily|date=8 January 2018}}</ref> Carrie Lam responded to criticism by stating "some Hong Kong legal professionals have an elitist mentality or double standards, that is, they think that Hong Kong’s legal system is supreme, and that the mainland legal system – a big country with a 1.3 billion population – is wrong." Her statement prompted widespread disbelief as she appeared to defend China's legal system being better than Hong Kong's legal system, hypocrisy as she herself is seen as an elite out of touch with society, damaged the One Country, two systems principle and for attacking the character rather the arguments of Hong Kong's top lawyers.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.hongkongfp.com/2018/01/02/rule-without-law-hong-kong-lawyers-hit-back-leader-carrie-lam-attacks-elitist-mentality/|title=‘Rule without law’: Hong Kong lawyers hit back as leader Carrie Lam attacks ‘elitist mentality’|work=Hong Kong Free Press|date=2 January 2018}}</ref>
On 28 December 2017, the [[Hong Kong Bar Association]] criticised the arrangement for distortion of the Basic Law, stating it damages the rule of law in Hong Kong as Article 18 was clearly written and leaves no room for any interpretation which would allow Chinese law to apply in any certain part of HKSAR. Since there is no legal basis, confidence in the "one country, two systems" principle will decline.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/12/28/beijings-distortion-hong-kong-basic-law-greatly-undermines-rule-law-legal-experts-warn/|title=Beijing’s ‘distortion’ of Hong Kong Basic Law greatly undermines rule of law, legal experts warn|work=Hong Kong Free Press|date=28 December 2017}}</ref> The Hong Kong government has defended the co-location agreement, stating that rule of law isn't damaged nor does undermine the Basic Law.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/12/29/govt-advisor-ronny-tong-beijings-joint-checkpoint-justification-not-harm-rule-law/|title=Gov’t advisor Ronny Tong: Beijing’s joint checkpoint justification does not harm rule of law|date=29 December 2017|work=Hong Kong Free Press}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/regional/2018-01/08/content_35457067.htm|title=Prescribed boundaries ensure joint checkpoint's legitimacy|newspaper=China Daily|date=8 January 2018}}</ref> Carrie Lam responded to criticism by stating "some Hong Kong legal professionals have an elitist mentality or double standards, that is, they think that Hong Kong’s legal system is supreme, and that the mainland legal system – a big country with a 1.3 billion population – is wrong." Her statement prompted widespread disbelief as she appeared to defend China's legal system being better than Hong Kong's legal system, hypocrisy as she herself is seen as an elite out of touch with society, damaged the One Country, two systems principle and for attacking the character rather the arguments of Hong Kong's top lawyers.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.hongkongfp.com/2018/01/02/rule-without-law-hong-kong-lawyers-hit-back-leader-carrie-lam-attacks-elitist-mentality/|title=‘Rule without law’: Hong Kong lawyers hit back as leader Carrie Lam attacks ‘elitist mentality’|work=Hong Kong Free Press|date=2 January 2018}}</ref>

==National Anthem Bill==
{{main|National Anthem Bill}}
The Hong Kong government has proposed the local implementation of the National Anthem Law of the People's Republic of China.


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 19:39, 22 March 2018

Carrie Lam Government

5th Government of the Hong Kong
Special Administrative Region
Date formed1 July 2017 (2017-07-01)
People and organisations
Head of stateXi Jinping
Head of governmentCarrie Lam
No. of ministers16
Member partiesDAB, BPA, FTU, LP, NPP
Status in legislaturePro-Beijing majority
Opposition partyPro-democracy camp
History
Election2017 Chief Executive election
Legislature term6th Legislative Council
PredecessorLeung government

The administration of Carrie Lam as Chief Executive of Hong Kong, officially referred to as "The 5th term Chief Executive of Hong Kong" relates to the period of governance of Hong Kong since the transfer of sovereignty of Hong Kong headed by Chief Executive Carrie Lam, between 1 July 2017 and 30 June 2022.

Election

In the 2017 Chief Executive election, Lam received 777 votes in the 1,194-member Election Committee, beating former Financial Secretary John Tsang's 365 votes and retired judge Woo Kwok-hing's 21 votes. Lam was the first female Chief Executive in history, higher than Leung's 689 votes in the last election. She also became the first Chief Executive elected without being the most popular candidate, as she had been trailing behind Tsang in the polls. She pledged to "heal the social divide" and "unite our society to move forward" in her victory speech.[1]

Lam received the appointment from Chinese Premier Li Keqiang on 11 April 2017.

Transitional period

The Hong Kong government established the Office of the Chief Executive-elect ahead of the election with a controversial decision to site the temporary office in Hong Kong’s most expensive business area in Champion Tower on Garden Road, Central. Former postmaster general Jessie Ting Yip Yin-mei was appointed as the head of the office, who Internet users said looked similar to Carrie Lam.[2]

One day after Lam vowed to "heal the social divide" in her victory speech, Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying's government pressed charges against nine key players in the 2014 Occupy protests, immediately sparking controversy whether Leung embarrassed Lam. Leung also blocked Carrie Lam’s pledge to scrap Territory-wide System Assessment (TSA) for Primary Three pupils.[3]

On 4 May 2017, former Director of Immigration Eric Chan was appointed the Director of the Office of the Chief Executive-elect as well as the Office of the Chief Executive she was sworn in after 1 July.[4]

Cabinet

Carrie Lam announced her cabinet on 21 June 2017.

Carrie Lam announced her new cabinet on 21 June 2017, with six incumbent ministers keep their portfolios including the three top secretaries.[5]

Ministry

Portfolio Minister Took office Left office Party
Chief Executive1 July 2017Incumbent Nonpartisan
Chief Secretary for Administration16 January 2017Incumbent Nonpartisan
Financial Secretary16 January 2017Incumbent Nonpartisan
Secretary for Justice1 July 20126 January 2018 Nonpartisan
6 January 2018Incumbent Nonpartisan
Secretary for the Civil Service1 July 2017Incumbent Nonpartisan
Secretary for Commerce and Economic Development1 July 2017Incumbent Nonpartisan
Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs1 July 2017Incumbent Nonpartisan
Secretary for Development1 July 2017Incumbent Nonpartisan
Secretary for Education1 July 2017Incumbent Nonpartisan
Secretary for the Environment1 July 2012Incumbent Nonpartisan
Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury1 July 2017Incumbent Nonpartisan
Secretary for Food and Health1 July 2017Incumbent Nonpartisan
Secretary for Home Affairs21 July 2015Incumbent DAB
Secretary for Innovation and Technology20 November 2015Incumbent Nonpartisan
Secretary for Labour and Welfare1 July 2017Incumbent Nonpartisan
Secretary for Security1 July 2017Incumbent Nonpartisan
Secretary for Transport and Housing1 July 2017Incumbent Nonpartisan

Executive Council non-official members

Members Affiliation Portfolio Assumed Office Left Office Born In Ref
bgcolor="Template:Nonpartisan/meta/color"| Bernard Chan Nonpartisan Non-official Convenor of the ExCo 1 July 2012 Incumbent 1951
bgcolor="Template:Nonpartisan/meta/color"| Laura Cha Nonpartisan Chairman of the Financial Services Development Council 19 October 2004 Incumbent 1949
bgcolor="Template:Nonpartisan/meta/color"| Arthur Li Nonpartisan Chairman of the Council of the University of Hong Kong 1 July 2012 Incumbent 1945
bgcolor="Template:Nonpartisan/meta/color"| Chow Chung-kong Nonpartisan Chairman of the Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing 1 July 2012 Incumbent 1950
bgcolor="Template:Nonpartisan/meta/color"| Fanny Law Nonpartisan Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks 1 July 2012 Incumbent 1953
bgcolor="Template:Business and Professionals Alliance for Hong Kong/meta/color"| Jeffrey Lam BPA Legislative Council Member & Vice-Chairman of BPA 17 October 2012 Incumbent 1951
bgcolor="Template:DABHK/meta/color"| Ip Kwok-him DAB Hong Kong Deputy to the National People's Congress &

former Vice-Chairman of DAB

17 March 2016 Incumbent 1951
bgcolor="Template:Nonpartisan/meta/color" | Martin Liao Nonpartisan Legislative Council Member 25 November 2016 Incumbent 1957
bgcolor="Template:LPHK/meta/color"| Tommy Cheung Liberal Legislative Council Member, Chairman of Liberal Party 25 November 2016 Incumbent 1949
bgcolor="Template:Nonpartisan/meta/color"| Joseph Yam Nonpartisan Executive Vice President of the China Society for Finance and Banking 1 July 2017 Incumbent 1948
bgcolor="Template:Nonpartisan/meta/color" | Lam Ching-choi Nonpartisan Chairman of the Elderly Commission 1 July 2017 Incumbent 1960
bgcolor="Template:New People's Party (Hong Kong)/meta/color"| Regina Ip NPP Legislative Council Member & Chairperson of NPP 1 July 2017 Incumbent 1950
bgcolor="Template:Path of Democracy/meta/color"| Ronny Tong Path of Democracy Senior Counsel & Convenor of Path of Democracy 1 July 2017 Incumbent 1950
bgcolor="Template:HKFTU/meta/color"| Wong Kwok-kin FTU Legislative Council Member & former Chairman of FTU 1 July 2017 Incumbent 1952
bgcolor="Template:BPAHK/meta/color"| Kenneth Lau BPA Legislative Council Member & Chairman of Heung Yee Kuk 1 July 2017 Incumbent 1966
bgcolor="Template:DABHK/meta/color"| Horace Cheung DAB Legislative Council Member & Vice-Chairman of DAB 1 July 2017 Incumbent 1974

Oath-taking controversy

The legal action by the former Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying and Secretary for Justice Rimsky Yuen had resulted in the unseating of four more pro-democracy legislators, Leung Kwok-hung, Nathan Law, Yiu Chung-yim and Lau Siu-lai on 14 July 2017 after two pro-independence legislators Sixtus Leung and Yau Wai-ching were ousted from the legislature earlier in November 2016. The event caused the quick deterioration of the relations between the pro-democracy camp and the government after the strained relations had been improved compared to Lam's predecessor.[6] Lam pledged she would not target more pro-democrats in oath-taking controversy.[7]

The proposed "co-location arrangement" of the Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hong Kong Express Rail Link has sparked concerns that it might constitute a breach of the Hong Kong Basic Law and undermine Hong Kong's autonomy of "one country, two systems", participially with immigration control. Under the arrangement, mainland customs officers will be allowed to set up checkpoints and exercise jurisdiction at the West Kowloon Station.[8]

On 28 December 2017, the Hong Kong Bar Association criticised the arrangement for distortion of the Basic Law, stating it damages the rule of law in Hong Kong as Article 18 was clearly written and leaves no room for any interpretation which would allow Chinese law to apply in any certain part of HKSAR. Since there is no legal basis, confidence in the "one country, two systems" principle will decline.[9] The Hong Kong government has defended the co-location agreement, stating that rule of law isn't damaged nor does undermine the Basic Law.[10][11] Carrie Lam responded to criticism by stating "some Hong Kong legal professionals have an elitist mentality or double standards, that is, they think that Hong Kong’s legal system is supreme, and that the mainland legal system – a big country with a 1.3 billion population – is wrong." Her statement prompted widespread disbelief as she appeared to defend China's legal system being better than Hong Kong's legal system, hypocrisy as she herself is seen as an elite out of touch with society, damaged the One Country, two systems principle and for attacking the character rather the arguments of Hong Kong's top lawyers.[12]

National Anthem Bill

The Hong Kong government has proposed the local implementation of the National Anthem Law of the People's Republic of China.

References

  1. ^ "'The work of uniting society begins now': Carrie Lam pledges to heal Hong Kong's divide". South China Morning Post. 26 March 2017.
  2. ^ "Hong Kong government finally sets up office for chief executive-elect after controversy over cost". South China Morning Post. 20 March 2017.
  3. ^ "Hong Kong Chief Executive CY Leung blocks Carrie Lam's pledge to scrap TSA". South China Morning Post. 28 March 2017.
  4. ^ "Hong Kong chief executive-elect Carrie Lam puts former head of immigration in charge of office". South China Morning Post. 4 May 2017.
  5. ^ "Next Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam announces her new cabinet". South China Morning Post. 21 June 2017.
  6. ^ "Hong Kong pan-democrats warn of Legislative Council turmoil". South China Morning Post. 18 July 2017.
  7. ^ "I won't target more Hong Kong pan-democrats in oath-taking saga, Carrie Lam says". South China Morning Post. 15 July 2017.
  8. ^ "Why we shouldn't stick to the co-location arrangement". EJ Insight.
  9. ^ "Beijing's 'distortion' of Hong Kong Basic Law greatly undermines rule of law, legal experts warn". Hong Kong Free Press. 28 December 2017.
  10. ^ "Gov't advisor Ronny Tong: Beijing's joint checkpoint justification does not harm rule of law". Hong Kong Free Press. 29 December 2017.
  11. ^ "Prescribed boundaries ensure joint checkpoint's legitimacy". China Daily. 8 January 2018.
  12. ^ "'Rule without law': Hong Kong lawyers hit back as leader Carrie Lam attacks 'elitist mentality'". Hong Kong Free Press. 2 January 2018.
Preceded by Government of Hong Kong
2017–present
Succeeded by
Incumbent