Legal science: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v1.6.1) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== External links == |
== External links == |
||
* [http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/lhr/17.3/schweber.html The "Science" of Legal Science: The Model of the Natural Sciences in Nineteenth-Century American Legal Education] |
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20070813083013/http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/lhr/17.3/schweber.html The "Science" of Legal Science: The Model of the Natural Sciences in Nineteenth-Century American Legal Education] |
||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Legal Science}} |
{{DEFAULTSORT:Legal Science}} |
||
Revision as of 02:34, 20 December 2017
 | This article is missing information about Error: you must specify what information is missing.. (August 2017) |
Legal science is one of the main components in the civil law tradition (after Roman law, canon law, commercial law, and the legacy of the revolutionary period).
Legal science is primarily the creation of German legal scholars of the middle and late nineteenth century, and it evolved naturally out of the ideas of Friedrich Carl von Savigny. Savigny argued that German codification should not follow the rationalist and secular natural law thinking that characterized the French codification but should be based on the principles of law that had historically been in force in Germany.[1]
References
- ^ John H. Merryman et al., The Civil Law Tradition: Europe, Latin America, and East Asia, Cases and Materials 481 (LexisNexis ed., 1994) (reprinted 2000).
Books
- Black's Law Dictionary, Abridged Seventh Edition, Bryan A. Garner
- Sabino Cassese, Recensione a J.H. Merryman, “The Italian Style, Doctrine, Law, Interpretation”, in “Stanford Law Review”, 1965–66, in “Rivista trimestrale di diritto pubblico”, 1966, n. 2, pp. 419–424.
External links
 | This law-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |