Jump to content

Template talk:Infobox scientist: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Template talk:Infobox scientist/Archive 9) (bot
Line 94: Line 94:
}}
}}
::{{ping|Primefac}} I'm afraid that I'm not sure what you mean by your second question, could you clarify? But with respect to your first, it's different in that the "Scientific career" header in this infobox is styled differently than the "Personal details" header in {{tl|Infobox officeholder}}. I've transcluded an example using the sandbox to the right. An example of the existing template can be seen at [[Ernest Rutherford]]. [[Special:Contributions/207.161.217.209|207.161.217.209]] ([[User talk:207.161.217.209|talk]]) 01:59, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
::{{ping|Primefac}} I'm afraid that I'm not sure what you mean by your second question, could you clarify? But with respect to your first, it's different in that the "Scientific career" header in this infobox is styled differently than the "Personal details" header in {{tl|Infobox officeholder}}. I've transcluded an example using the sandbox to the right. An example of the existing template can be seen at [[Ernest Rutherford]]. [[Special:Contributions/207.161.217.209|207.161.217.209]] ([[User talk:207.161.217.209|talk]]) 01:59, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
:::To be honest, I answered my own questions, but your post here and my own digging have prompted some more (so don't worry about the earlier questions):
:::As near as I can tell {{t|infobox officeholder}} is rather unusual in colouring their headers. All of the examples found at [[WP:IEmbed]] do not colour their headers. This makes me wonder - is IB officeholder the only one that colours their header? If there are more IBs that colour their headers, then we'd have to assign a different colour scheme for ''every'' one of them. This is both tedious and bad coding. If it is the only one that colours the headers, then we'd still have to go and change every transclusion of {{t|infobox scientist}} being used as a child to use this new parameter.
:::At this point in time I'm not convinced that changing the code simply for the means of affecting one infobox combination is worth it. I'll leave the TPER open, though, in case others want to chime in. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 02:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:57, 31 October 2016

Template-protected edit request on 14 July 2016


209.197.139.178 (talk) 05:04, 14 July 2016 (UTC) need to add his religion.[reply]

 Not done That attribute is not directly related to the general profession of "scientist", you would need to establish a consensus amongst editors that it is relevant (by continuing this discussion below) before it can be added. — xaosflux Talk 14:03, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Parents

Can someone add the code so "parents" displays. I see the data in about 50 templates, but it is not displaying. We have the odd situation where we link to children, but once there we are not linking back to parents. Every other biographical template includes it. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 02:19, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

H-index

I would like to suggest that the H-index be added to the template, since H-index or i10-index are significantly more important than the personal information for a living or recent died scientist.--Sahehco (talk) 15:12, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Embedding in {{Infobox officeholder}}

When the template is embedded in {{Infobox officeholder}}, the heading ("Scientific career") displays with a different style of heading than those used by the main template (for, e.g, "Personal details"). I've made a correction in the template's sandbox that should resolve this through the use of the parameter embed_officeholder. 207.161.217.209 (talk) 20:04, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How is this any different than just setting |embed=yes? In other words, why not add the |headerstyle= #if statement to trigger off the embed param? Primefac (talk) 23:33, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sir Mark Oliphant
Oliphant in 1939
27th Governor of South Australia
In office
1 December 1971 – 30 November 1976
MonarchElizabeth II
PremierDon Dunstan
Lieutenant Governor
Preceded bySir James Harrison
Succeeded bySir Douglas Nicholls
Personal details
Born(1901-10-08)8 October 1901
Kent Town, Adelaide, Australia
Died14 July 2000(2000-07-14) (aged 98)
Canberra, Australia
Residences
  • Australia
  • United Kingdom
  • United States
Sir Mark Oliphant
Alma mater
Known for
Awards
Scientific career
Institutions
ThesisThe Neutralization of Positive Ions at Metal Surfaces, and the Emission of Secondary Electrons (1929)
Doctoral advisorErnest Rutherford
Doctoral studentsErnest Titterton
@Primefac: I'm afraid that I'm not sure what you mean by your second question, could you clarify? But with respect to your first, it's different in that the "Scientific career" header in this infobox is styled differently than the "Personal details" header in {{Infobox officeholder}}. I've transcluded an example using the sandbox to the right. An example of the existing template can be seen at Ernest Rutherford. 207.161.217.209 (talk) 01:59, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
To be honest, I answered my own questions, but your post here and my own digging have prompted some more (so don't worry about the earlier questions):
As near as I can tell {{infobox officeholder}} is rather unusual in colouring their headers. All of the examples found at WP:IEmbed do not colour their headers. This makes me wonder - is IB officeholder the only one that colours their header? If there are more IBs that colour their headers, then we'd have to assign a different colour scheme for every one of them. This is both tedious and bad coding. If it is the only one that colours the headers, then we'd still have to go and change every transclusion of {{infobox scientist}} being used as a child to use this new parameter.
At this point in time I'm not convinced that changing the code simply for the means of affecting one infobox combination is worth it. I'll leave the TPER open, though, in case others want to chime in. Primefac (talk) 02:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]