Jump to content

Iraq and weapons of mass destruction: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
reinserting removedi nfo
Line 4: Line 4:
The [[United States]] and [[Britain]], along with many intelligence experts, believed that Saddam Hussein possessed hidden stockpiles of [[WMD]]'s, and must be prevented from building anymore. Hussein denied having any such weapons while at the same time refused to allow weapons inspectors unrestricted access to his country's various facilities. The United States and the United Nations came into conflict as a majority of members of the Security Council refused to support a military solution to the crisis, and the United States and the "Coalition of the Willing" invaded Iraq and overthrew Saddam Hussein in the spring of 2003.
The [[United States]] and [[Britain]], along with many intelligence experts, believed that Saddam Hussein possessed hidden stockpiles of [[WMD]]'s, and must be prevented from building anymore. Hussein denied having any such weapons while at the same time refused to allow weapons inspectors unrestricted access to his country's various facilities. The United States and the United Nations came into conflict as a majority of members of the Security Council refused to support a military solution to the crisis, and the United States and the "Coalition of the Willing" invaded Iraq and overthrew Saddam Hussein in the spring of 2003.


Great controversy emerged when no stockpiles of such weapons were found, leading to accusations that the United States, and in particular its President [[George W. Bush]] had deliberately inflated intelligence or lied about Iraq's weapons in order to justify an invasion of the country. While various leftover weapons components from the 1980's and 1990's have also been found, most weapons inspectors do not now believe that the WMD program proceeded after the early 1990's, though various theories continue to be put forward.
Great controversy emerged when no stockpiles of such weapons were found, leading to accusations that the United States, and in particular its President [[George W. Bush]] had deliberately inflated intelligence or lied about Iraq's weapons in order to justify an invasion of the country. As of [[June 21]], [[2006]], declassified documents show that over 500 chemical munitions containing degraded Mustard or Sarin Nerve agent built prior to 1991 have been recovered in Iraq <ref>{{cite web | author= | year=June 2006| title=National Ground Intelligence Center "Key Points" | format= | work= | url=http://santorum.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=1078 | accessdate=2006-06-26}}</ref>, though no post 1991 munitions have been found. While various leftover weapons components from the 1980's and 1990's have also been found, most weapons inspectors do not now believe that the WMD program proceeded after the early 1990's, though various theories continue to be put forward.


==Program development 1970's - 1980's==
==Program development 1970's - 1980's==

Revision as of 02:16, 11 July 2006

Iraq and weapons of mass destruction concerns the Iraqi government's use, possession, and alleged intention of acquiring more types of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) during the presidency of Saddam Hussein. During his reign of several decades, he was internationally renowned for his use of chemical weapons against civilians and in the Iran-Iraq War. Following the 1991 Gulf War he also engaged in a decade-long confrontation with the United Nations and its weapons inspectors, culminating in the 2003 invasion by the United States.

The United States and Britain, along with many intelligence experts, believed that Saddam Hussein possessed hidden stockpiles of WMD's, and must be prevented from building anymore. Hussein denied having any such weapons while at the same time refused to allow weapons inspectors unrestricted access to his country's various facilities. The United States and the United Nations came into conflict as a majority of members of the Security Council refused to support a military solution to the crisis, and the United States and the "Coalition of the Willing" invaded Iraq and overthrew Saddam Hussein in the spring of 2003.

Great controversy emerged when no stockpiles of such weapons were found, leading to accusations that the United States, and in particular its President George W. Bush had deliberately inflated intelligence or lied about Iraq's weapons in order to justify an invasion of the country. As of June 21, 2006, declassified documents show that over 500 chemical munitions containing degraded Mustard or Sarin Nerve agent built prior to 1991 have been recovered in Iraq [1], though no post 1991 munitions have been found. While various leftover weapons components from the 1980's and 1990's have also been found, most weapons inspectors do not now believe that the WMD program proceeded after the early 1990's, though various theories continue to be put forward.

Program development 1970's - 1980's

File:Chirac nuclear reactor.jpg
Saddam Hussein (middle left) and Jacque Chirac (right) examining a nuclear weapons facility

In the early 1970's, Saddam Hussein ordered the creation of a clandestine nuclear weapons program.[2] Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction programs were assisted by a wide variety of firms and governments in the 1970s and 1980s. [3][4][5][6] As part of Project 922, German firms such as Karl Kobe helped build Iraqi Chemical weapons facilities such as laboratories, bunkers, an administrative building, and first production buildings in the early 1980s under the cover of a pesticide plant. Other German firms sent 1,027 tons of precursors of Mustard gas, Sarin, Tabun, and tear gasses in all. This work allowed Iraq to produce 150 tons of mustard agent and 60 tons of Tabun in 1983 and 1984 respectively, continuing throughout the decade. Five other German firms supplied equipment to manfacture botulin toxin and mycotoxin for germ warfare. In 1988, German engineers presented centrifuge data that assisted Iraq expand its nuclear weapons program. Laboratory equipment and other information was provided, involving many German engineers. All told, 52% of Iraq's international chemical weapon equipment was of German origin. The State Establishment for Pesticide Production (SEPP) ordered culture media and incubators from Germany's Water Engineering Trading.[7]

France built Iraq’s Nuclear Osirak reactor in the late 1970s. Israel claimed that Iraq was getting close to building nuclear weapons, and so bombed it in 1981. Later, a French company built a turnkey factory which helped make nuclear fuel. France also provided glass-lined reactors, tanks, vessels, and columns used for the production of chemical weapons. Strains of dual use biological material also helped advance Iraq’s biological warfare program. Around 21% of Iraq’s international chemical weapon equipment was French.

Italy gave Iraq plutonium extraction facilities that advanced Iraq’s nuclear weapon program. 75,000 shells and rockets designed for chemical weapon use also came from Italy. Between 1979 and 1982 Italy gave depleted, natural, and low-enriched uranium. Swiss companies aided in Iraq’s nuclear weapons development in the form of specialized presses, milling machines, grinding machines, electrical discharge machines, and equipment for processing uranium to nuclear weapon grade. Brazil secretly aided the Iraqi nuclear weapon program by supplying natural uranium dioxide between 1981 and 1982 without notifying the IAEA. About 100 tons of Mustard gas also came from Brazil.

The United States exported $500 million of dual use exports to Iraq that were approved by the Commerce department.} Among them were advanced computers, some of which were used in Iraq’s nuclear program, and also material which could be used as biological weapon precursors. Through the non-profit American Type Culture Collection and the Centers for Disease Control, the U.S. government under Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush sold or sent biological samples to Iraq under Saddam Hussein up until 1989. These materials included precursors to anthrax, West Nile virus and botulism, as well as Brucella melitensis, which damages major organs, and Clostridium perfringens, which causes gas gangrene. Some of these materials were used for Iraq's biological weapons research program, while others were used for vaccine development.[8]

The United Kingdom paid for a chlorine factory that was intended to be used for manufacturing mustard gas.[9] The government secretly gave the arms company Matrix Churchill permission to supply parts for the Iraqi supergun, precipitating the Arms-to-Iraq affair when it became known.

Many other countries contributed as well; since Iraq's nuclear program in the early 1980s was officially viewed internationally as for power production, not weapons, there were no UN prohibitions against it. An Austrian company gave Iraq calutrons for enriching uranium. The nation also provided heat exchangers, tanks, condensers, and columns for the Iraqi chemical weapons infrastructure, 16% of the international sales. Singapore gave 4,515 tons of precursors for VX, sarin, tabun, and mustard gasses to Iraq. The Dutch gave 4,261 tons of precursors for sarin, tabun, mustard, and tear gasses to Iraq. Egypt gave 2,400 tons of tabun and sarin precursors to Iraq and 28,500 tons of weapons designed for carrying chemical munitions. India gave 2,343 tons of precursors to VX, tabun, Sarin, and mustard gasses. Luxembourg gave Iraq 650 tons of mustard gas precursors. Spain gave Iraq 57,500 munitions designed for carrying chemical weapons. In addition, they provided reactors, condensers, columns and tanks for Iraq’s chemical warfare program, 4.4% of the international sales. China provided 45,000 munitions designed for chemical warfare. Portugal provided yellowcake between 1980 and 1982. Niger provided yellowcake in 1981.[10]

Use of WMD's

File:Halabjaattack.jpg
Victims of the WMD attack on Halabja in 1988

The first supposed use of WMD's in Iraq may have been in the 1920's. The Royal Air Force dropped mustard gas on Bolshevik troops in 1919, and Winston Churchill, secretary of state for war and air, suggested that the RAF use it in Iraq in 1920 during a major revolt there. Historians are divided as to whether or not gas was in fact used.[11]

In 1980 the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency filed a report asserting that Iraq had been actively acquiring chemical weapons capacities for several years, which later proved to be accurate. [citation needed] In November 1980, two months into the Iran-Iraq War, the first reported use of chemical weapons took place when Tehran radio reported a poison gas attack on Susangerd by Iraqi forces.[citation needed] The United Nations reported many similar attacks occurred the following year, leading Iran to develop and deploy a mustard gas capability. By 1984, Iraq was using poison gas with great effectiveness against Iranian "human wave" attacks.[citation needed]. Chemical weapons were used extensively against Iran by Iraq. [12] On January 14th, 1991, the Defense Intelligence Agency said an Iraqi agent described, in medically accurate terms, military smallpox casualties he said he saw in 1985 or 1986. Two weeks after, the Armed Forces Medical Intelligence Center reported that eight of 69 Iraqi prisoners of war whose blood was tested showed a current immunity to smallpox, which had not occurred naturally in Iraq since 1971; the same prisoners has also been inoculated for anthrax.[13]

All of this occuring while Iraq was a party to the Geneva Protocol on September 8, 1931, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty on October 29, 1969, signed the Biological Weapons Convention in 1972, but did not ratify until June 11, 1991. Iraq has not signed to the Chemical Weapons Convention.

The Washington Post reported that in 1984 the CIA secretly started feeding intelligence to the Iraqi army. This included assistance in targeting chemical weapons strikes. The same year it was confirmed beyond doubt by European doctors and U.N. expert missions that Iraq was employing chemical weapons against the Iranians.[citation needed] Most of these occurred during the Iran-Iraq War, but WMDs were used at least once to crush the popular uprisings of 1991. While chemical weapons were used extensively, there is no proof that Iraq ever employed biological weapons in combat.

With more than 100,000 Iranian soldiers as victims of Saddam Hussein's Chemical and Biological weapons during the eight-year war with Iraq,[14] Iran today is the world's top afflicted country by Weapons of Mass Destruction, only after Japan. The official estimate does not include the civilian population contaminated in bordering towns or the children and relatives of veterans, many of whom have developed blood, lung and skin complications, according to the Organization for Veterans. Nerve gas agents killed about 20,000 Iranian soldiers immediately, according to official reports. Of the 90,000 survivors, some 5,000 seek medical treatment regularly and about 1,000 are still hospitalized with severe, chronic conditions. Many others were hit by Mustard gas. Despite the removal of Saddam and his regime by American forces, there is deep resentment and anger in Iran that it was Western companies (West Germany, France) that helped Iraq develop its chemical weapons arsenal in the first place and that the world did nothing to punish Iraq for its use of chemical weapons throughout the war.

Halabja poison gas attack -On 23 March, 1988 western media sources reported from Halabja in Iraqi Kurdistan, that several days before Iraq had launched a large scale chemical assault on the town. Later estimates were that 4000 people had been killed. The Halabja poison gas attack caused an international outcry against the Iraqis. Later that year the U.S. Senate unanimously passed the "Prevention of Genocide Act", cutting off all U.S. assistance to Iraq and stopping U.S. imports of Iraqi oil. The Reagan administration opposed the bill, calling it premature, and eventually prevented it from taking effect, partly due to a mistaken DIA assessment which blamed Iran for the attack.

The Iraqis blamed the Halabja attack on Iranian forces. This was still the position of Saddam Hussein in his December 2003 captivity. Some evidence appears to support this theory. A report at the time by the United States Defense Intelligence Agency asserted that evidence of blood agent use was found in bodies of dead Kurds. At the time of the attack Iran was reportedly using the blood agent cyanide whereas Iraq was employing mustard gas.[15]Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and Physicians for Human Rights disagree with this, since the symptoms they found all corresponded to both mustard and sarin gas, and there was little evidence to suggest cyanide poisoning. [citation needed]

WMD attacks

Location WMD used Date Casualties
Haij Umran Mustard August 1983 fewer than 100 Iranian/Kurdish
Panjwin Mustard October-November 1983 3,000 Iranian/Kurdish
Majnoon Island Mustard February-March 1984 2,500 Iranians
al-Basrah Tabun March 1984 50-100 Iranians
Hawizah Marsh Mustard & Tabun March 1985 3,000 Iranians
al-Faw Mustard & Tabun February 1986 8,000 to 10,000 Iranians
Um ar-Rasas Mustard December 1986 1,000s Iranians
al-Basrah Mustard & Tabun April 1987 5,000 Iranians
Sumar/Mehran Mustard & nerve agent October 1987 3,000 Iranians
Halabjah Mustard & nerve agent March 1988 1,000s Kurdish/Iranian
al-Faw Mustard & nerve agent April 1988 1,000s Iranians
Fish Lake Mustard & nerve agent May 1988 100s or 1,000s Iranians
Majnoon Islands Mustard & nerve agent June 1988 100s or 1,000s Iranians
South-central border Mustard & nerve agent July 1988 100s or 1,000s Iranians
an-Najaf -
Karbala area
Nerve agent & CS March 1991 Shi’a casualties not known

(Source:[6])

The 1991 Gulf War

On 2 August 1991 Iraq invaded Kuwait and was widely condemned internationally.[16]The policy of the United States on Hussein's government changed rapidly, as it was feared Saddam intended to dominate other oil-rich nations in the region such as Saudi Arabia.[citation needed] As stories of atrocities from the occupation of Kuwait diseminated, several of which later proved false, older atrocities and his WMD arsenal were also given attention.[citation needed] , as of 1991, Iraq was within one to three years of developing nuclear weapons. However, others say that Iraq's nuclear weapons program suffered a serious setback in 1981 when the reactor used to generate source material for its bomb was bombed by Israel.[citation needed] The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists concurs with this view: there were far too many technological challenges unsolved, they say.[17] An international coalition of nations, led by the United States, liberated Kuwait in 1991.[18]

In the terms of the UN ceasefire were set out in Security Council Resolution 686, and in Resolution 687 was forbidden from developing, possessing or using chemical, biological and nuclear weapons by resolution 686. Other items proscribed by the treaty included missiles with a range of more than 150 kilometres and the creation of the UN Special Commission on weapons (UNSCOM), extends sanctions on the country, and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was to verify the destruction of Iraq's nuclear program.[19][20]

Between Gulf Wars

UNSCOM inspections 1991-1998

The United Nations Special Commission on Iraq (UNSCOM) was headed by Rolf Ekéus and later Richard Butler. During several visits to Iraq by United Nations Special Committee (UNSCOM), set up after the 1990 invasion of Kuwait to inspect Iraqi weapons facilities, weapons inspectors interviewed British educated Iraqi biologist Rihab Rashid Taha. According to a 1999 report from the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency, the normally mild-mannered Taha exploded into violent rages whenever UNSCOM questioned her about al-Hakam, shouting, screaming and, on one occasion, smashing a chair, while insisting that al-Hakam was a chicken-feed plant.[21] "There were a few things that were peculiar about this animal-feed production plant," Charles Duelfer, UNSCOM's deputy executive chairman, later told reporters, "beginning with the extensive air defenses surrounding it." The facility was destroyed by UNSCOM in 1996.[citation needed]

In 1995, UNSCOM's principle weapons inspector, Dr. Rod Barton from Australia, showed Taha documents obtained by UNSCOM that showed the Iraqi government had just purchased 10 tons of growth medium from a British company called Oxoid. Growth media is a mixture of sugars, proteins and minerals that provides nutrients for microorganisms to growth. It can be used in hospitals and microbiology/molecular biology research laboratories, in hospitals swabs from patients are placed in dishes containing growth medium for diagnostic purposes. Iraq's hospital consumption of growth medium was just 200 kg a year; yet in 1988, Iraq imported 39 tons of it. Shown this evidence by UNSCOM, Taha admitted to the inspectors that she had grown 19,000 litres of botulism toxin;[22]] 8,000 litres of anthrax; 2,000 litres of aflatoxins, which can cause liver failure; Clostridium perfringens, a bacterium that can cause gas gangrene; and ricin, a castor-bean derivative which can kill by impeding circulation. She also admitted conducting research into cholera, salmonella, foot and mouth disease, and camel pox, a disease that uses the same growth techniques as smallpox, but which is safer for researchers to work with. It was because of the discovery of Taha's work with camel pox that the U.S. and British intelligence services feared Saddam Hussein may have been planning to weaponize the smallpox virus. Iraq had a smallpox outbreak in 1971 and the Weapons Intelligence, Nonproliferation and Arms Control Center (WINPAC) believed the Iraqi government retained contaminated material.[13]

UNSCOM also learned that, In August 1990, after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, Taha's team was ordered to set up a program to weaponize the biological agents. By January 1991, a team of 100 scientists and support staff had filled 157 bombs and 16 missile warheads with botulin toxin, and 50 bombs and five missile warheads with anthrax. In an interview with the BBC, Taha denied the Iraqi government had weaponized the bacteria. "We never intended to use it," she told journalist Jane Corbin of the BBC's Panorama program. "We never wanted to cause harm or damage to anybody." However, UNSCOM found the munitions dumped in a river near al-Hakam. UNSCOM also discovered that Taha's team had conducted inhalation experiments on donkeys from England and on beagles from Germany. The inspectors seized photographs showing beagles having convulsions inside sealed containers.

The inspectors feared that Taha's team had experimented on human beings. During one inspection, they discovered two primate-sized inhalation chambers, one measuring 5 cubic metres, though there was no evidence the Iraqis had used large primates in their experiments. According to former weapons inspector Scott Ritter in his 1999 book Endgame: Solving the Iraq Crisis, UNSCOM learned that, between July 01 and August 15, 1995, 50 prisoners from the Abu Ghraib prison were transferred to a military post in al-Haditha, in the northwest of Iraq.[citation needed] Iraqi opposition groups say that scientists sprayed the prisoners with anthrax, though no evidence was produced to support these allegations. During one experiment, the inspectors were told, 12 prisoners were tied to posts while shells loaded with anthrax were blown up nearby. Ritter's team demanded to see documents from Abu Ghraib prison showing a prisoner count. Ritter writes that they discovered the records for July and August 1995 were missing. Asked to explain the missing documents, the Iraqi government charged that Ritter was working for the CIA and refused UNSCOM access to certain sites like Baath Party headquarters.[23] Although Ekéus has said that he resisted attempts at such espionage, many allegations have since been made against the agency commission under Butler, charges which Butler has denied.[citation needed]

In August 1998, Ritter resigned his position as UN weapons inspector and sharply criticized the Clinton administration and the U.N. Security Council for not being vigorous enough about insisting that Iraq's weapons of mass destruction be destroyed. Ritter also accused U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan of assisting Iraqi efforts at impeding UNSCOM's work. "Iraq is not disarming," Ritter said on August 27, 1998, and in a second statement, "Iraq retains the capability to launch a chemical strike." In 1998 the UNSCOM weapons inspectors were withdrawn from Iraq. They were not expelled from the country by Iraq as has often been reported (and as George W. Bush alleged in his infamous "axis of evil" speech). Rather, according to Butler himself in his book Saddam Defiant, it was U.S. Ambassador Peter Burleigh, acting on instructions from Washington, who suggested Butler pull his team from Iraq in order to protect them from the forthcoming U.S. and British airstrikes which eventually took place from from December 16-December 19, 1998.

Between the Inspections: 1998-2002

Scott Ritter later accused some UNSCOM personnel of spying.[24] On August 31, 1998, Ritter said: "Iraq still has proscribed weapons capability. There needs to be a careful distinction here. Iraq today is challenging the special commission to come up with a weapon and say where is the weapon in Iraq, and yet part of their efforts to conceal their capabilities, I believe, have been to disassemble weapons into various components and to hide these components throughout Iraq. I think the danger right now is that without effective inspections, without effective monitoring, Iraq can in a very short period of time measure the months, reconstitute chemical biological weapons, long-range ballistic missiles to deliver these weapons, and even certain aspects of their nuclear weaponization program."[25]

In June, 1999, Ritter responded to an interviewer saying: "When you ask the question, 'Does Iraq possess militarily viable biological or chemical weapons?' the answer is no! It is a resounding NO. Can Iraq produce today chemical weapons on a meaningful scale? No! Can Iraq produce biological weapons on a meaningful scale? No! Ballistic missiles? No! It is 'no' across the board. So from a qualitative standpoint, Iraq has been disarmed. Iraq today possesses no meaningful weapons of mass destruction capability."[26]

In 2002, Ritter stated that, as of 1998, 90–95% of Iraq's nuclear, biological, and chemical capabilities, and long-range ballistic missiles capable of delivering such weapons, had been verified as destroyed. Technical 100% verification was not possible, said Ritter, not because Iraq still had any hidden weapons, but because Iraq had preemptively destroyed some stockpiles and claimed they had never existed. Many people were surprised by Ritter's "bizarre turnaround" in his view of Iraq during a period when no inspections were made.[27] In 2000, Ritter produced a film that portrayed Iraq as fully disarmed. The film was funded by an Iraqi-American businessman who had received Oil-for-Food coupons from Saddam Hussein that he sold for $400,000.[28][29] During the 2002–2003 build-up to war Ritter criticized the Bush administration and maintained that it had provided no credible evidence that Iraq had reconstituted a significant WMD capability. In an interview with Time in September 2002. In the same interview Ritter said there were attempts to used UNSCOM being for spying on Iraq.[30]

UNSCOM encountered various difficulties and a lack of cooperation by the Iraqi government. In 1998, UNSCOM was withdrawn at the request of the United States before Operation Desert Fox. Despite this, UNSCOM's own estimate was that 90-95% of Iraqi WMD's had been successfully destroyed before its 1998 withdrawal. After that Iraq remained without any outside weapons inspectors for five years. During this time speculations arose that Iraq had actively resumed its WMD programmes. In particular, various figures in the George W. Bush administration as well as Congress went so far as to express concern about nuclear weapons:

There is dispute about whether Iraq still had WMD programs after 1998 and whether its cooperation with the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) was complete. UN Chief Weapons Inspector said in January 2003 that Iraq has, "...not genuinely accepted U.N. resolutions demanding that it disarm." On 7 March, in an address to the Security Council, Hans Blix, the head of UNMOVIC, appeared to take a more positive view describing current Iraqi level of cooperation as "active or even proactive". Attributing increased Iraqi initiative to "outside pressure" he stated his estimate that it would take several months for all outstanding WMD issues to be resolved. United States officials treated Blix's report dismissively.


There were no weapon inspections in Iraq for nearly four years after the U.N. departed from Iraq in 1998, and Iraq asserted that they would never be invited back.[31] In addition, Saddam issued a secret order that Iraq did not have to abide by any U.N. Resolution since in his view the U.S. had broken international law.[32]

In 2001 Saddam stated that "we are not at all seeking to build up weapons or look for the most harmful weapons . . . however, we will never hesitate to possess the weapons to defend Iraq and the Arab nation".[33] The International Institute for Strategic Studies in Britain published in September 2002 a review of Iraq's military capability, and concluded that Iraq could assemble nuclear weapons within months if fissile material from foreign sources were obtained.[34] However, it concluded that without such foreign sources, it would take years at a bare minimum. The numbers were viewed as overly optimistic by many critics (such as the Federation of American Scientists and the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists).[citation needed]

Runup to the 2003 Iraq War

In late 2002 Saddam Hussein, in a letter to Hans Blix, invited UN weapons inspectors back into the country. Subsequently the Security Council issued resolution 1441 authorizing new inspections in Iraq. The carefully-worded U.N. resolution put the burden on Iraq, not U.N. inspectors, to prove that they no longer had weapons of mass destruction. The US claimed that Iraq's weapons report which was filed with the U.N. leaves weapons and materials unaccounted for; the Iraqis claimed that it was destroyed, something that had been confirmed years earlier by Iraq's highest profile defector, Hussein Kamel. According to reports from the previous U.N. inspection agency, UNSCOM, Iraq produced 600 metric tons of chemical agents, including mustard gas, VX and sarin, and nearly 25,000 rockets and 15,000 artillery shells, with chemical agents, that are still unaccounted for. In fact, in 1995, Iraq told the United Nations that it had produced at least 30,000 liters of biological agents, including anthrax and other toxins it could put on missiles, but that all of it had been destroyed.

In January 2003, United Nations weapons inspectors reported that they had found no indication that Iraq possessed nuclear weapons or an active program. Some former UNSCOM inspectors disagree about whether the United States could know for certain whether or not Iraq had renewed production of weapons of mass destruction. Robert Gallucci said, "If Iraq had [uranium or plutonium], a fair assessment would be they could fabricate a nuclear weapon, and there's no reason for us to assume we'd find out if they had." Similarly, former inspector Jonathan Tucker said, "Nobody really knows what Iraq has. You really can't tell from a satellite image what's going on inside a factory." However, Hans Blix said in late January 2003 that Iraq had "not genuinely accepted U.N. resolutions demanding that it disarm."[35] He claimed there were some materials which had not been accounted for. Since sites had been found which evidenced the destruction of chemical weaponry, UNSCOM was actively working with Iraq on methods to ascertain for certain whether the amounts destroyed matched up with the amounts that Iraq had produced.[36] [37] In the next quarterly report, after the war, the total amount of proscribed items destroyed by UNMOVIC in Iraq can be gathered.[38] Those include:

  • 50 deployed Al Samoud 2 missiles
  • Various equipment, including vehicles, engines and warheads, related to the AS2 missiles
  • 2 large propellant casting chambers
  • 14 155 mm shells filled with mustard gas, the mustard gas totalling approximately 49 litres and still at high purity
  • Approximately 500 ml of thiodiglycol
  • Some 122 mm chemical warheads
  • Some chemical equipment
  • 224.6 kg of expired growth media

Scott Ritter stated that the WMDs Saddam had in his possession all those years ago has long since turned to harmless substances. Sarin and tabun have a shelf life of five years, VX lasts a bit longer (but not much longer), and finally botulinum toxin and liquid anthrax last about three years. [39] On March 7, 2003, Hans Blix's last report to the UN security Council prior to the US led invasion of Iraq, described Iraq as actively and proactively cooperating with UNMOVIC, though not necessarily in all areas of relevance and had been frequently uncooperative in the past, but that it was within months of resolving key remaining disarmament tasks.[40]

The 2003 war

Iraq's refusal to allow inspections stipulated under UN Resolutions and the threat of operational, banned WMD in the hands of Saddam Hussein was given as the chief of several reasons for the decision of the United States and its coalition to invade Iraq and topple his government in the 2003 invasion of Iraq.[citation needed]

On 17 March 2003, Peter Goldsmith, Attorney General of the UK, set out his government's legal justification for an invasion of Iraq. He said that Security Council resolution 678 authorised force against Iraq, which was suspended but not terminated by resolution 687, which imposed continuing obligations on Iraq to eliminate its weapons of mass destruction. A material breach of resolution 687 would revive the authority to use force under resolution 678. In resolution 1441 the Security Council determined that Iraq was in material breach of resolution 687 because it had not fully carried out its obligations to disarm. Although resolution 1441 had given Iraq a final chance to comply "it is plain that Iraq has failed so to comply". Most member governments of the United Nations Security Council made clear that after resolution 1441 there still was no authorization for the use of force.

Speaking on FOX News Sunday, David Kay said "We know there were terrorist groups in state [Iraq] still seeking WMD capability. Iraq, although I found no weapons, had tremendous capabilities in this area. A marketplace phenomenon was about to occur, if it did not occur; sellers meeting buyers. And I think that would have been dangerous if the war had not intervened."[41]

Prior to the invasion of Iraq, the United States stated that Saddam Hussein had 48 hours to step down and leave Iraq.[42] As the deadline approached, the US announced that forces would be sent to verify his disarmament and a transition to a new government.[citation needed] There were media reports that American forces were prepared to be attacked with WMD's, but although various protective gear was found, WMD's were not used against American troops.[43] On May 1st, 2003, American President George W. Bush declared major combat operations to have ceased.[44]

Theories in the aftermath of the 2003 war

File:10 jan 2004 EOD mortar rounds iraq.jpg
Photographed 10 January 2004. An Icelandic or Danish EOD wearing what is known as “ABC Svær”, a double protected ABC suit (Normal camouflage ABC-suit with another layer on top of that) while examining mortar rounds that were suspected to contain illegal chemicals.

Stockpiles were being built post-1991

Transported to another country

Rumors from top governmental officials have abounded of possible transportation of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction to foreign countries, namely Syria and Lebanon, right before Operation Iraqi Freedom began.

Former Iraqi general Georges Sada stated that in late summer 2002, Saddam had ordered all of his stockpiles to be moved to Syria. The former number two in the Iraqi Air Force stated that with the arrival of inspectors on November 1st, he took the occasion of Syria’s broken dam and made an “air bridge”, bringing by air and by ground, moved them into cargo aircraft and moved them into Syria.[45][46] He also claimed that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi’s attempt to use 20 tons of chemical weapons in Amman, Jordan and kill 80,000 civilians came from a large cache in Syria, originally transported from Iraq. [47] [48][49] Another Iraqi general, Ali Ibrahim al-Tikriti who defected before the 1991 Gulf War, claimed in 2006 that weapons are in Syria because of long military deals going back to the late 1980’s, where contingency plans would be activated if either country were threatened.[50]] The credibility of both men was brought into question by Alex Koppelman who questions the closeness of Syria and Iraq after Syria fought against Iraq in the 1991 Gulf War.[51]

Claims were also made by Lieutenant General Moshe Yaalon, a former Israeli officer who served as chief of staff of the Israel Defense Forces from July 2002 to June 2005. The General told the New York Sun in December 2005 that “[Saddam] transferred the chemical agents from Iraq to Syria.”[52] He had previous said in April 2004 that "perhaps" they had been transferred to Syria. [citation needed] Even Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said that “Chemical and biological weapons which Saddam is endeavoring to conceal have been moved from Iraq to Syria.”[53] These claims were considered by the Iraq Survey Group Duelfer report addenda, and stated that because of worsening violence in Iraq they were forced to stop after several months, and results remain inconclusive. It appeared that no official transportation of WMD’s took place, though a limited amount of unofficial movement could not be rule out.[54] They did note that Saddam Hussein periodically removed guards from the Syrian border and replaced them with intelligence officers who would then supervise the movement of banned materials between Syria and Iraq. There was also particularly heavy traffic in large trucks on the border before the United States invasion.[55] In testimony before a Senate panel in October 2004, Charles Duelfer stated that this was true, but it was not possible to say if they were WMD-related, and later other officials concurred that there was no information that would indicate what they contained.[56]

Former Deputy Undersecretary of Defense John A. Shaw has also alleged that the Russians played an extensive role in transporting materials into Syria and Lebanon, and he claims he found that trucks were transporting materials to Syria and returning empty. Also, containers with warnings painted on them were moved to a Beirut hospitals basement. Russia and China were also alleged to have helped arm and then move WMD equipment.[57]

In one of the Saddam tapes released in 2006 of a conversation with one of his aides, he is asked "Where was the nuclear material transported to?" He then says, "A number of them were transported out of Iraq."[58] Reports claim Saddam discusses WMD and links to terrorists on these tapes. US Congressman Pete Hoekstra called for the U.S. government to put the remaining 35,000 boxes of documents on the internet so Arabic speakers around the world can help translate the documents.[59] The U.S. government is in the process of releasing these documents called the Operation Iraqi Freedom documents.

Still hidden

Some experts, such as former Pentagon investigator Dave Gaubatz, allege that not all of the potential sites that may have WMD's have been searched. On February 12, 2006, he appeared on Fox News Channel and claimed he and fellow military investigators identified four underground bunkers with five foot thick concrete walls in southern Iraq believed to hold WMD. Iraqi informants had brought these sites to the attention of Gaubatz and his colleagues. Gaubatz claims that, for various reasons, these sites have never been inspected by the Iraq Survey Group or the CIA, and made a plea the sites be inspected.[60]

On August 14, 2005, The Washington Post published an article reporting a raid on a suspected chemical weapons facility in Iraq where (according to the US military) chemical weapons had been uncovered and were now in the process of being classified. The Post reported that "the suspected lab was new, dating from some time after the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003."[61]

The Washington Times editorialized on a moment on the "Saddam tapes" that revealed "Saddam was actively working on a plan to enrich uranium using a technique known as plasma separation. This is particularly worrisome because of the date of the conversation: It took place in 2000, nearly five years after Iraq's nuclear programs were thought to have stopped."[62]

Stockpiles weren't created post-1991

Coalition inflated intelligence

In an interview with BBC in June 2004 David Kay, former head of the Iraq Survey Group, made the following comment:

"Anyone out there holding — as I gather Prime Minister Blair has recently said — the prospect that, in fact, the Iraq Survey Group is going to unmask actual weapons of mass destruction, [is] really delusional."

A year after Bush administration claims about Iraqi "bioweapons trailers" were discredited by American experts, a biological weapons specialist from Australia has claimed that U.S. officials were still suppressing the findings, and that a CIA officer told him it was "politically not possible" to report that the White House claims (about WMD) were untrue.[63] On 4 June 2003, U.S. Senator Pat Roberts announced that the U.S. Select Committee on Intelligence that he chaired would "as a part of its ongoing oversight of the intelligence community...conduct a Review of intelligence on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. On 9 July 2004, the Committee released the Senate Report of Pre-war Intelligence on Iraq. On July 17, 2003, the British Prime Minister Tony Blair said in an address to the US congress, that history would forgive the United States and United Kingdom, even if they were wrong about weapons of mass destruction. He still maintained that "with every fiber of instinct and conviction" Iraq did have weapons of mass destruction.

On May 30, 2003, Paul Wolfowitz stated in an interview with Vanity Fair magazine that the issue of weapons of mass destruction was the point of greatest agreement among Bush's team among the reasons to remove Saddam Hussein from power. In Vanity Fair, he said, "The truth is that for reasons that have a lot to do with the U.S. government bureaucracy, we settled on the one issue that everyone could agree on, which was weapons of mass destruction as the core reason..." The remainder of the quote, which was not included in the article, is as follows, according to a Pentagon transcript: "...but, there have always been three fundamental concerns. One is weapons of mass destruction, the second is support for terrorism, the third is the criminal treatment of the Iraqi people. Actually I guess you could say there's a fourth overriding one which is the connection between the first two."[64] The same day, General James T. Conway, senior Marine commander in Iraq, expressed similar thoughts in a satellite interview with reporters at the Pentagon.

"It was to do with information management. The intention was to dramatise it."[65] On 3 February 2004, British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw announced an independent inquiry, to be chaired by Lord Butler of Brockwell, to examine the reliability of British intelligence relating to alleged weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.[66]

The Butler Review was published 14 July 2004.

One notable excerpt:

"We conclude that, on the basis of the intelligence assessments at the time, covering both Niger and the Democratic Republic of Congo, the statements on Iraqi attempts to buy uranium from Africa in the Government's dossier, and by the Prime Minister in the House of Commons, were well-founded. By extension, we conclude also that the statement in President Bush's State of the Union Address of 28 January 2003 that 'The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa' was well-founded."[67]

In the build up to the 2003 war the New York Times published a number of stories claiming to prove that Iraq possessed WMD. One story in particular, written by Judith Miller helped persuade the American public that Iraq had WMD: in September 2002 she wrote about an intercepted shipment of aluminum tubes which the NYT said were to be used to develop nuclear material. It is now clear that they could not be used for that purpose. The story was followed up with television appearances by Colin Powell, Donald Rumsfeld and Condoleezza Rice all pointing to the story as part of the basis for taking military action against Iraq. Miller's sources were introduced to her by Ahmed Chalabi, an Iraqi exile favourable to a US invasion of Iraq. Miller is also listed as a speaker for The Middle East Forum, an organization which openly declared support for an invasion. In May 2004 the New York Times published an editorial which stated that its journalism in the build up to war had sometimes been lax. It appears that in the cases where Iraqi exiles were used for the stories about WMD were either ignorant as to the real status of Iraq's WMD or lied to journalists to achieve their own ends.

Despite the intelligence lapse, Bush stood by his decision to invade Iraq stating:

But what wasn't wrong was Saddam Hussein had invaded a country, he had used weapons of mass destruction, he had the capability of making weapons of mass destruction, he was firing at our pilots. He was a state sponsor of terror. Removing Saddam Hussein was the right thing for world peace and the security of our country.

In a speech before the World Affairs Council of Charlotte, NC, on April 7, 2006, President Bush stated that he "fully understood that the intelligence was wrong, and [he was] just as disappointed as everybody else" when U.S. troops failed to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.[68]

Intelligence shortly before the 2003 invasion of Iraq was heavily used as support arguments in favor of military intervention with the October 2002 C.I.A. report on Iraqi WMD's considered to be the most reliable one available at that time.[69]

"According to the CIA's report, all U.S. intelligence experts agree that Iraq is seeking nuclear weapons. There is little question that Saddam Hussein wants to develop nuclear weapons." Senator John Kerry (D-Mass.) - Congressional Record, October 9, 2002[70]

On May 29, 2003, Andrew Gilligan appears on the BBC's Today program early in the morning. Among the contentions he makes in his report are that the government "ordered (the September Dossier, a British Government dossier on WMD) to be sexed up, to be made more exciting, and ordered more facts to be...discovered." The broadcast is not repeated.[71]

On May 27, 2003, a secret Defense Intelligence Agency fact-finding mission in Iraq reported unanimously to intelligence officials in Washington that two trailers captured in Iraq by Kurdish troops "had nothing to do with biological weapons." The trailers had been a key part of the argument for the 2003 invasion; Secretary of State Colin Powell had told the United Nations Security Council, "We have firsthand descriptions of biological weapons factories on wheels and on rails. We know what the fermenters look like. We know what the tanks, pumps, compressors and other parts look like." The Pentagon team had been sent to investigate the trailers after the invasion. The team of experts unanimously found "no connection to anything biological"; one of the experts told reporters that they privately called the trailers "the biggest sand toilets in the world." The report was classified, and the next day, the CIA publicly released the assessment of its Washington analysts that the trailers were "mobile biological weapons production." The White House continued to refer to the trailers as mobile biological laboratories throughout the year, and the Pentagon field report remained classified. It is still classified, but a Washington Post report of 12 April 2006 disclosed some of the details of the report. According to the Post:

A spokesman for the DIA asserted that the team's findings were neither ignored nor suppressed, but were incorporated in the work of the Iraqi Survey Group, which led the official search for Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. The survey group's final report in September 2004 -- 15 months after the technical report was written -- said the trailers were "impractical" for biological weapons production and were "almost certainly intended" for manufacturing hydrogen for weather balloons.[72] "No one was more surprised than I that we didn't find (WMD's)." General Tommy Franks December 2nd 2005.[73]

On 6 February 2004, U.S. President George W. Bush named an Iraq Intelligence Commission, chaired by Charles Robb and Laurence Silberman, to investigate United States intelligence, specifically regarding the 2003 invasion of Iraq and Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. On 8 February 2004, Dr Hans Blix, in an interview on BBC TV, accused the US and British governments of dramatising the threat of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, in order to strengthen the case for the 2003 war against the government of Saddam Hussein. Quote:

Saddam was misled

A rumor originating among the British intelligence community was the Saddam had been lied to about his biological and chemical weapons capabilities. And as most of the informers for British intelligence were high level informers close to Saddam, the British were also fooled. Doctor Gary Samore of the International Institute for Strategic Studies noted that during the 2003 invasion, there was "chatter" among Iraqi forces that was interpreted to mean that a chemical weapons attack was ordered. Whether they really had these weapons, whether it was bluster to frighten the coalition or fool Saddam is unclear.[74]

Only retained old weapons and equipment to develop later

On 30 May 2003, The U.S. Department of Defense briefed the media that it was ready to formally begin the work of the Iraq Survey Group (ISG), a fact finding mission from the coalition of the Iraq occupation into the WMD programs developed by Iraq, taking over from the British-American 75th Exploitation Task Force.

On October 6, 2004, the head of the Iraq Survey Group (ISG), Charles Duelfer, announced to the United StatesSenate Armed Services Committee that the group found no evidence that Iraq under Saddam Hussein had produced and stockpiled any weapons of mass destruction since 1991, when UN sanctions were imposed.[75]

Bill Tierney, former UNSCOM inspector and Arabic linguist had stated that he believed Iraq could very well have produced enough weapons grade uranium to make weapons, and their past attempts make this a strong possibility.[76]

Various nuclear facilities, including the Baghdad Nuclear Research Facility and Tuwaitha Nuclear Research Center, were found looted in the month following the invasion. (Gellman, 3 May 2003) On June 20, 2003, the International Atomic Energy Agency reported that tons of uranium, as well as other radioactive materials such as thorium, had been recovered, and that the vast majority had remained on site. There were several reports of radiation sickness in the area. By June 7, 2003, many American and British media sources[77]began questioning the credibility of the Bush administration, and John Dean even brought up the possibility of impeachment[78] for "lying to Congress and the American people", although this idea has largely fallen by the wayside since some members of Congress had access to much of the same information as the White House. It has been suggested that the documents and suspected weapons sites were looted and burned in Iraq by looters in the final days of the war.[79]

The reason for the high false positive rates is that field tests using the ICAM (Improved Chemical Agent Monitor) are very inaccurate, and even the more time consuming field tests have shown themselves to be poor at determining whether something is a chemical weapon. According to Donald Rumsfeld, ""Almost all first reports we get turn out to be wrong," he said. "We don't do first reports and we don't speculate."[80] Many chemicals used in explosives, such as phosphorus, show up as blister agents. Other chemicals, such as pesticides (especially organophosphates such as malathion), routinely show up as nerve agents. Chemically, they are quite similar — the main difference is that some organophosphates kill only insects, and are consequently used as insecticides.

On May 2 2004 a shell containing mustard gas, was found in the middle of street west of Baghdad. The Iraq Survey Group investigation reported that it had been previously "stored improperly", and thus the gas was "ineffective" as a useful chemical agent. Officials from the Defense Department commented that they were not certain if use was to be made of the device as a bomb.[81]

On May 16 2004 a 152mm artillery shell was used as an improvised bomb.("Iraq's Chemical Warfare Program Annex F". Retrieved 2005-06-29.) The shell exploded and two U.S. soldiers were treated for minor exposure to a nerve agent (nausea and dilated pupils). On May 18 it was reported by U.S. Department of Defense intelligence officials that tests showed the two-chambered shell contained the chemical agent sarin, the shell being "likely" to have contained three to four liters of the substance (in the form of its two unmixed precursor chemicals prior to the aforementioned explosion that had not effectively mixed them).[81] Former U.S. weapons inspector David Kay told the Associated Press that "he doubted the shell or the nerve agent came from a hidden stockpile, although he didn't rule out that possibility." Kay also considered it possible that the shell was "an old relic overlooked when Saddam said he had destroyed such weapons in the mid-1990s."[82] It is likely that the insurgents who planted the bomb did not know it contained sarin, according to Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt, and another U.S. official confirmed that the shell did not have the markings of a chemical agent.[82] The Iraq Survey Group later concluded that the shell "probably originated with a batch that was stored in a Al Muthanna CW complex basement during the late 1980s for the purpose of leakage testing." ("Iraq's Chemical Warfare Program Annex F". Retrieved 2005-06-29.)

On 29 October U.S. intelligence spokesmen claimed that Iraqi WMDs and programs had been comprehensively hidden before or immediately after the fall of Bagdhad, with some elements of the programs being shipped out of the country.

Tom, an imminent threat is a political judgment. It’s not a technical judgment. I think Baghdad was actually becoming more dangerous in the last two years than even we realized. Saddam was not controlling the society any longer. In the marketplace of terrorism and of WMD, Iraq well could have been that supplier if the war had not intervened.'

In a July 2 2004 article published by The Associated Press and reported by Fox News that more WMD not destroyed by the Iraqi Regime were discovered in South Central Iraq by Polish Allies. Sarin Gas warheads dating back to the last Iran-Iraq war were trying to be purchased by terrorists for $5000 a warhead. The Polish troops secured munitions on June 23, 2004.[83] After being tested, it turned out that the warheads did not in fact contain sarin gas. The Coalition Press Information Center in Baghdad announced that the munitions "were all empty and tested negative for any type of chemicals."[84] The US abandoned its search for WMDs in Iraq on January 12 2005.

On September 30, 2004, the U.S. Iraq Survey Group Final Report concluded that, "ISG has not found evidence that Saddam Husayn (sic) possessed WMD stocks in 2003, but the available evidence from its investigation—including detainee interviews and document exploitation—leaves open the possibility that some weapons existed in Iraq although not of a militarily significant capability."[85] Among the key findings of the final ISG report were:

  1. Evidence of the maturity and significance of the pre-1991 Iraqi Nuclear Program but found that Iraq's ability to reconstitute a nuclear weapons program progressively decayed after that date;
  2. Concealment of nuclear program in its entirety, as with Iraq's BW program. Aggressive UN inspections after Desert Storm forced Saddam to admit the existence of the program and destroy or surrender components of the program;
  3. After Desert Storm, Iraq concealed key elements of its program and preserved what it could of the professional capabilities of its nuclear scientific community;
  4. Saddam's ambitions in the nuclear area were secondary to his prime objective of ending UN sanctions; and
  5. A limited number of post-1995 activities would have aided the reconstitution of the nuclear weapons program once sanctions were lifted.

The report found that "The ISG has not found evidence that Saddam possessed WMD stocks in 2003, but [there is] the possibility that some weapons existed in Iraq, although not of a militarily significant capability." It also concluded that there was a possible intent to restart all banned weapons programs as soon as multilateral sanctions against it had been dropped, with Hussein pursuing WMD proliferation in the future : "There is an extensive, yet fragmentary and circumstantial, body of evidence suggesting that Saddam pursued a strategy to maintain a capability to return to WMD after sanctions were lifted..."[86] No senior Iraqi official interviewed by the ISG believed that Saddam had forsaken WMD forever.

In the Saddam tapes, one of Saddams aides insist the inspections are meaningless, since Iraq retained the technical skill and personele to reconstitute the program at a later date.[87]

After he was captured by U.S. forces in Baghdad in 2003, Dr. Mahdi Obeidi, who ran Saddam's nuclear centrifuge program until 1997, handed over blueprints for a nuclear centrifuge along with some actual centrifuge components, stored at his home — buried in the front yard — awaiting orders from Baghdad to proceed. He said, "I had to maintain the program to the bitter end." In his book, "The Bomb in My Garden," the Iraqi physicist explains that his nuclear stash was the key that could have unlocked and restarted Saddam's bombmaking program.

On October 3, 2003, the world digests David Kay's Iraq Survey Group report that finds no stockpiles of WMD in Iraq, although it states the government intended to develop more weapons with additional capabilities. Weapons inspectors in Iraq do find some "biological laboratories" and a collection of "reference strains", including a strain of botulinum bacteria, "ought to have been declared to the UN." Kay testifies that Iraq had not fully complied with UN inspections. In some cases, equipment and materials subject to UN monitoring had been kept hidden from UN inspectors. "So there was a WMD program. It was going ahead. It was rudimentary in many areas," Kay would say in a later interview.[88] In other cases, Iraq had simply lied to the UN in its weapons programs.[89] The US-sponsored search for WMD had at this point cost $300 million and was projected to cost around $600 million more.

According to Kay, Iraq worked on WMDs right under the noses of UNMOVIC. Kay said that Iraq had tried to weaponize ricin "right up until" Operation Iraqi Freedom. [88][90]

In David Kay's statement on the interim report of the ISG[91] the following paragraphs are found:

"We have not yet found stocks of weapons, but we are not yet at the point where we can say definitively either that such weapon stocks do not exist or that they existed before the war and our only task is to find where they have gone. We are actively engaged in searching for such weapons based on information being supplied to us by Iraqis."

"With regard to delivery systems, the ISG team has discovered sufficient evidence to date to conclude that the Iraqi regime was committed to delivery system improvements that would have, if OIF had not occurred, dramatically breached UN restrictions placed on Iraq after the 1991 Gulf War."

"ISG has gathered testimony from missile designers at Al Kindi State Company that Iraq has reinitiated work on converting SA-2 Surface-to-Air Missiles into ballistic missiles with a range goal of about 250km. Engineering work was reportedly underway in early 2003, despite the presence of UNMOVIC. This program was not declared to the UN."

"ISG has developed multiple sources of testimony, which is corroborated in part by a captured document, that Iraq undertook a program aimed at increasing the HY-2's range and permitting its use as a land-attack missile. These efforts extended the HY-2's range from its original 100km to 150-180km. Ten modified missiles were delivered to the military prior to OIF and two of these were fired from Umm Qasr during OIF -- one was shot down and one hit Kuwait."

Another notable statement is the following:

"We have discovered dozens of WMD-related program activities and significant amounts of equipment that Iraq concealed from the United Nations during the inspections that began in late 2002."

The phrase of 'WMD-related program activities' was later used in George Bush's state of the union speech. Bush's critics, often not realizing the origin of the statement, derided Bush for unclear wording and trying to "lower the bar" on confirming his pre-war WMD-claims.


In a January 26, 2004 interview with Tom Brokaw of NBC news, Mr. Kay described Iraq's nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons programs as being in a "rudimentary" stage. He also stated that "What we did find, and as others are investigating it, we found a lot of terrorist groups and individuals that passed through Iraq."[92] In responding to a question by Mr. Brokaw as to whether Iraq was a "gathering threat" as President Bush had asserted before the invasion, Mr. Kay answered:

In June of 2004, the United States removed 2 tons of low-enriched uranium from Iraq. Ivan Oelrich, a physicist at the Federation of American Scientists concludes that 2 tons of low-enriched uranium can be enriched and be made into a nuclear weapon.[93]

Since the 2003 invasion of Iraq, several reported finds of chemical weapons were announced. During the invasion itself, there were half a dozen incidents in which the US military announced that it had found chemical weapons. All of these claims were based on field reports, and were later retracted. After the war, many cases — most notably on April 7, 2003 when several large drums tested positive — continued to be reported in the same way.

Another such post-war case occurred on January 9, 2004, when Icelandic munitions experts and Danish military engineers discovered 36 120-mm mortar rounds containing liquid buried in Southern Iraq. While initial tests suggested that the rounds contained a blister agent, a chemical weapon banned by the Geneva Convention,[citation needed] subsequent analysis by American and Danish experts showed that no chemical agent was present.[94] It appears that the rounds have been buried, and most probably forgotten, since the Iran-Iraq war. Some of the munitions were in an advanced state of decay and most of the weaponry would likely have been unusable.

Demetrius Perricos, then head of UNMOVIC, stated that the Kay report contained little information not already known by UNMOVIC.[95] Many organizations, such as the journal Biosecurity and Bioterrorism, have claimed that Kay's report is a "worst case analysis"[96]

On June 21, 2006 Rick Santorum claimed that "we have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons," citing a June 6th letter to Pete Hoekstra saying that "approximately 500 weapons munitions" containing "degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent" had been found since 2003. [97] "Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq's pre-Gulf War chemical munitions," it said, "filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War munitions are assessed to still exist." [98]

The Washington Post reported that "the U.S. military announced in 2004 in Iraq that several crates of the old shells had been uncovered and that they contained a blister agent that was no longer active." It said the shells "had been buried near the Iranian border, and then long forgotten, by Iraqi troops during their eight-year war with Iran, which ended in 1988."

Saddam lied to stay in power

On 14 December Saddam Hussein was captured by U.S. forces. Time Online Edition reports that in his first interrogation he was asked whether Iraq had any WMDs. According to an official, his reply was: "'No, of course not, the U.S. dreamed them up itself to have a reason to go to war with us.' The interrogator continued along this line, said the official, asking: 'if you had no weapons of mass destruction then why not let the U.N. inspectors into your facilities?' Saddam’s reply: 'We didn’t want them to go into the presidential areas and intrude on our privacy.'"[99] Later interviews with Saddam's military leaders indicated that Saddam didn't want it demonstrated through inspections that he didn't possess WMDs in certain places in order to pose a threat against those who might attempt a coup.[citation needed]

See also

References

  1. ^ "National Ground Intelligence Center "Key Points"". June 2006. Retrieved 2006-06-26.
  2. ^ Hamza, Khidhir (September/October 1998). "Inside Saddam's secret nuclear program". The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Retrieved 2006-06-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  3. ^ "What Iraq Admitted About its Chemical Weapons Program" (GIF). Retrieved 2006-04-28.
  4. ^ "Iraq's Purchases in the A-Bomb Supermarket" (PDF). The New York Times: E5. 1993. Retrieved 2006-04-28. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  5. ^ "Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq's WMD, Chapter 4 - Nuclear". September 30, 2004. Retrieved 2006-04-28.
  6. ^ a b "Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq's WMD, Chapter 5 - Iraq's Chemical Warfare Program". September 30, 2004. Retrieved 2006-04-28.
  7. ^ McGee, Maggie (October 10th, 1990). "We Have Surprises". Der Spiegel. pp. 1148–152. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  8. ^ Associated Press (October 1st, 2002). "Iraq got seeds for bioweapons from U.S." Baltimore Sun. Retrieved 2006-06-09. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  9. ^ The Guardian (March 6, 2003). "Britain's dirty secret". Retrieved 2006-07-04.
  10. ^ Copley, Gregory R. (September 8th, 2004). "Reports of French Involvement in Niger-Iraq Uranium Case Not Reliable". GIS Special Topical Studies. Retrieved 2006-06-09. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  11. ^ Hopwood, Derek (October 2nd, 2003). "British Relations with Iraq". BBC. Retrieved 2006-06-09. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  12. ^ Fassihi, Farnaz (October 27th, 2002). "In Iran, grim reminders of Saddam's arsenal". The Star-Ledger. Retrieved 2006-06-09. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  13. ^ a b Gellman, Barton (November 5th, 2002). "4 Nations Thought To Possess Smallpox". Washington Post. Retrieved 2006-04-28. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  14. ^ Hughes, Paul (January 21st, 2003). "'It's like a knife stabbing into me'". The Star. Retrieved 2006-06-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  15. ^ Hirst, David (March 22nd, 1988). "The Kurdish victims caught unaware by cyanide". The Guardian. Retrieved 2006-06-09. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  16. ^ "1990: Iraq invades Kuwait". BBC. August 2nd, 1990. Retrieved 2006-06-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  17. ^ Albright, David (1991). "Iraq and the bomb: Were they even close?". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 47 (2): 16–25. Retrieved 2006-04-28. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  18. ^ "Kuwait (11/05)". US State Department. November, 2005. Retrieved 2006-06-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  19. ^ "Security Council Resolution 686" (PDF). The United Nations. March 2nd, 1991. Retrieved 2006-06-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  20. ^ "Security Council Resolution 687" (PDF). The United Nations. April 3rd, 1991. Retrieved 2006-06-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  21. ^ "The Inspections Maze". Christian Science Monitor. 2002. Retrieved 2006-04-28.
  22. ^ Corbin, Jane (9 February 2003). "Iraqi bio-scientist breaks silence". BBC One Panorama. Retrieved 2006-04-28.
  23. ^ "Baghdad prevents inspections at Baath party headquarters". Arabic News.com. 12/11/1998. Retrieved 2006-04-28. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  24. ^ "Unscom 'infiltrated by spies'". BBC News. March 23, 1999. Retrieved 2006-04-28.
  25. ^ "Smoking Gun on Scott Ritter Transcript August 31st, 1998". Free Republic. 01/20/2003. Retrieved 2006-04-28. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  26. ^ Arons, Nicholas (June 24th, 1999). "Interview with Scott Ritter". Fellowship of Reconciliation. Retrieved 2006-04-28. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  27. ^ Lynch, Colum (2000). "Ex-U.N. Inspector Ritter to Tour Iraq, Make Documentary". The Washington Post: A18. Retrieved 2006-04-28. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  28. ^ Hayes, Stephen F. (2001). "Saddam Hussein's American Apologist". The Weekly Standard. 7 (10). Retrieved 2006-04-28. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  29. ^ Hayes, Stephen F. (2003). "Saddam's Cash". The Weekly Standard. 8 (33). Retrieved 2006-04-28. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  30. ^ Calabresi, Massimo (September 12th, 2002). "Exclusive: Scott Ritter in His Own Words". Time Magazine. Retrieved 2006-06-09. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  31. ^ King, Kyle (December 20th, 1998). "U-S OFFICIALS SAY THEY UNDERSTAND THAT SADDAM HUSSEIN MAY NEVER ALLOW U-N WEAPONS INSPECTORS BACK IN THE COUNTRY". Voice of America. Retrieved 2006-06-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help); line feed character in |title= at position 55 (help)
  32. ^ "Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq's WMD Chapter 1: Regime Strategic Intent - Section 7: Realizing Saddam's Veiled WMD Intent". September 30 2004. Retrieved 2006-04-28. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  33. ^ "Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq's WMD Chapter 1: Regime Strategic Intent". September 30 2004. Retrieved 2006-04-28. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  34. ^ "Iraq Dossier:Director's press statement" (PDF). The International Institute for Strategic Studies. September 9th, 2002. Retrieved 2006-06-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  35. ^ "Blix: Iraq can't account for deadly gas, germs". CNN.com. January 27, 2003. Retrieved 2006-04-28.
  36. ^ Blix, Hans (28 February 2003). "Twelfth quarterly report of the Executive Chairman of the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission" (PDF). UNMOVIC. Retrieved 2006-04-28.
  37. ^ Karon, Tony (Feb. 24, 2003). "Why Saddam Might Destroy His Missiles". Time.com. Retrieved 2006-04-28. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  38. ^ Blix, Hans (30 May 2003). "Thirteenth quarterly report of the Executive Chairman of the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission" (PDF). UNMOVIC. Retrieved 2006-04-28.
  39. ^ "'Even if Iraq managed to hide these weapons, what they are now hiding is harmless goo'". The Guardian. September 19, 2002. Retrieved 2006-04-28.
  40. ^ Blix, Hans (7 March 2003). "Oral introduction of the 12th quarterly report of UNMOVIC". Retrieved 2006-04-28.
  41. ^ "Transcript: David Kay on 'Fox News Sunday'". FOX News. February 1, 2004. Retrieved 2006-04-29.
  42. ^ Bush, George W. (May 13th, 2003). "President Says Saddam Hussein Must Leave Iraq Within 48 Hour". whitehouse.gov. Retrieved 2006-06-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  43. ^ "Chemical Suits, Gas Masks Are Some Signs Iraq Planning Chemical Strike". Associated Press. March 25th, 2003. Retrieved 2006-04-29. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  44. ^ Bush, George W. (May 1st, 2003). "President Bush Announces Major Combat Operations in Iraq Have Ended". whitehouse.gov. Retrieved 2006-06-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  45. ^ "Exclusive! Former Top Military Aide to Saddam Reveals Dictator's Secret Plans". Hannity & Colmes, FOX News. January 25, 2006. Retrieved 2006-04-29.
  46. ^ "Saddam ordered WMD strike on Israel". The Jerusalem Post. Jan. 28, 2006. Retrieved 2006-04-29. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  47. ^ "Iraqi General: Syria Gave Al-Qaida Saddam's WMDs". Newsmax. Jan. 29, 2006. Retrieved 2006-04-29. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  48. ^ "Jordan says major al Qaeda plot disrupted". CNN.com. April 26, 2004. Retrieved 2006-04-29.
  49. ^ "Jordan Airs Confessions of Suspected Terrorists". FOX News. April 27, 2004. Retrieved 2006-04-29.
  50. ^ "The Changed Baathist: Interview with Ali Ibrahim Al-Tikriti". WorldThreats.com. Feb. 15, 2006. Retrieved 2006-06-17. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  51. ^ "Lions, Tigers and WMD Conspiracies, Oh My!". Dragonfire.org. February 2006. Retrieved 2006-06-17.
  52. ^ Stoll, Ira (December 15, 2005). "Saddam's WMD Moved to Syria, An Israeli Says". New York Sun. Retrieved 2006-04-29.
  53. ^ "The Middle East Quarterly". Fall 2005. Retrieved 2006-06-30.
  54. ^ "Comprehensive Report - Addendums to the of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq's WMD" (PDF). March 2005. Retrieved 2006-04-29.
  55. ^ "Saddam agents on Syria border helped move banned materials". Washington Times. August 16th, 2004. Retrieved 2006-04-29. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  56. ^ "No Basis For WMD Smuggling Claims". CBS News. Jan. 17, 2005. Retrieved 2006-04-29. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  57. ^ Timmerman, Kenneth R. (February 19th, 2006). "Ex-Official: Russia Moved Saddam's WMD". News Max. Retrieved 2006-04-29. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  58. ^ "Need to Know". The Weekly Standard. 11 (23). 2006. Retrieved 2006-04-29. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  59. ^ "Pete Hoekstra on MSNBC" (WMV). Retrieved 2006-04-29.
  60. ^ "Dave Gaubatz on Fox News" (WMV). Retrieved 2006-04-29.
  61. ^ Knickmeyer, Ellen (2005). "Iraqi Chemical Stash Uncovered". Washington Post: A18. Retrieved 2006-04-29. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  62. ^ "New questions on Saddam, WMD". Washington Times. February 20th, 2006. Retrieved 2006-04-29. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  63. ^ The Associated Press (May 14th, 2006). "Inspector: Politics stunted 'biotrailer' findings". The Register=Guard. Retrieved 2006-06-09. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  64. ^ "Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz Interview with Sam Tannenhaus, Vanity Fair". May 9, 2003. Retrieved 2006-04-28.
  65. ^ "Blix doubts on Iraq intelligence". BBC News. 8 February, 2004. Retrieved 2006-04-29. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  66. ^ "Iraq WMD inquiry details unveiled". BBC News. 3 February 2004. Retrieved 2006-04-28.
  67. ^ "Saddam, Uranium and Africa - What two investigations say about Bush's statements on Iraq, yellowcake and Niger". Wall Street Journal. July 15, 2004. Retrieved 2006-04-28.
  68. ^ Curl, Joseph (April 7, 2006). "Bush 'disappointed' data on prewar Iraq were wrong". The Washington Times. Retrieved 2006-04-29.
  69. ^ "Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction Programs". CIA. October 2002. Retrieved 2006-04-28.
  70. ^ "Setting the Record Straight: Sen. Levin On Iraq". White House. November 14th, 2005. Retrieved 2006-04-28. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  71. ^ "BBC/Blair Battle Timeline". PBS.org. Retrieved 2006-04-28.
  72. ^ Warrick, Joby (2006). "Lacking Biolabs, Trailers Carried Case for War". Washington Post: A01. Retrieved 2006-04-28. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  73. ^ Warrick, Joby (August 16th, 2004). "Retired general 'surprised' no WMD found". Retrieved 2006-04-28. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help); Unknown parameter |word= ignored (help)
  74. ^ Norton-Taylor, Richard and Borger, Julian (December 24th, 2003). "New theory for Iraq's missing WMD: Saddam was fooled into thinking he had them". The Guardian. Retrieved 2006-06-20. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  75. ^ "Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq's WMD - Chapter 1: Nuclear - Key Findings". Retrieved 2006-04-29.
  76. ^ Glazov, Jamie (November 16, 2005). "Where the WMDs Went". FrontPageMagazine.com. Retrieved 2006-04-29.
  77. ^ "No weapons in Iraq? We'll find them in Iran". Sunday Herald. 1 June 2003. Retrieved 2006-04-28.
  78. ^ Dean, John W. (June 6, 2003). "Is lying about the reason for a war an impeachable offense?". CNN.com. Retrieved 2006-04-28.
  79. ^ "President's Radio Address". Whitehouse.gov. June 21, 2003. Retrieved 2006-04-28.
  80. ^ "Preliminary Tests Show Chemical Weapons at Iraqi Site". FOX News. April 7, 2003. Retrieved 2006-04-29.
  81. ^ a b Porteus, Liza (May 19, 2004). "Tests Confirm Sarin in Iraqi Artillery Shell". FOX News. Retrieved 2006-04-29.
  82. ^ a b "Iraq Sarin Find Worries U.S." CBS News. May 17, 2004. Retrieved 2006-04-29.
  83. ^ "Polish Troops Find Sarin Warheads". FOX News. July 02, 2004. Retrieved 2006-04-29. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  84. ^ Pincus, Walter (2004). "Chemicals Not Found in Iraq Warheads". Washington Post: A21. Retrieved 2006-04-29. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  85. ^ "Iraq Survey Group Final Report". Global Security.org. Retrieved 2006-04-29.
  86. ^ "Report concludes no WMD in Iraq". BBC News. 7 October, 2004. Retrieved 2006-04-28. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  87. ^ Ensor, David, Nasr, Octavia, Redman, Justine and de Sola, David (February 19th, 2006). "On tape, Hussein talks of WMD's". cnn.com. Retrieved 2006-06-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  88. ^ a b Leo, John (2/9/2004). "Kay's say and the CIA". USNews.com. Retrieved 2006-04-28. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  89. ^ "Text of David Kay's unclassified statement". CNN.com. October 2, 2003. Retrieved 2006-04-28.
  90. ^ "What we know today". Chicago Tribune. November 20, 2005. Retrieved 2006-04-28.
  91. ^ Kay, David (2 October 2003). "Statement by David Kay on the interim progress report on the activities of the Iraq Survey Group". The White House. Retrieved 2006-04-28.
  92. ^ Brokaw, Tom (Jan. 26, 2004). "David Kay: Exclusive interview - Chemical, biological, nuclear programs 'rudimentary'". NBC News. Retrieved 2006-04-29. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  93. ^ "U.S. Removes Two Tons of Uranium From Iraq". FOXNews.com. July 07, 2004. Retrieved 2006-04-28. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  94. ^ "Mortar shells from Iraq had no chemical agents". January 19, 2004. Retrieved 2006-04-29.
  95. ^ Pincus, Walter (14 December 2003). "U.N. inspector: Little new in U.S. probe for Iraq arms". Retrieved 2006-04-28.
  96. ^ Binder, Patrice (2003). "The Kay Report to Congress on the Activities of the Iraq Survey Group: Former Bioweapons Inspectors Comment". Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science. 1 (4): 239–246. Retrieved 2006-04-28. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  97. ^ "Report: Hundreds of WMDs Found in Iraq". Fox News. June 21st, 2006. Retrieved 2006-04-29. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  98. ^ "De-classified Report" (PDF). House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. June 21st, 2006. Retrieved 2006-04-29. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  99. ^ Bennett, Brian (14 December 2003). "Time exclusive: Notes from Saddam in custody". Time Online Edition. Retrieved 2006-04-28.

External links