Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer

Reviewer

(add request • view requests)

User:David Condrey

• David Condrey (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

I'd like to become more actively involved in moderating Wikipedia. I've had an account since 2007 and have recently gotten more involved, focusing most of my attention on expanding existing articles, and improving references; most focused on the subjects related to internet technologies which is my profession, being a web developer by trade. Thank you. David Condrey (talk) 00:06, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

 Done -- Lord Roem ~ (talk) 23:43, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

User:Johnsmith2116

• Johnsmith2116 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

I've been editing for two years and have gotten to know the ins-and-outs fairly well. I know how to tell the difference between a good edit, good faith but unnecessary edit, and vandalistic edit. I can dedicate about an hour per day to reviewing, perhaps a little more on weekends if time allows. Currently I edit regularly at the rate of about 15-20 edits per week, mostly on the golf-related pages, and occasionally what I see on the professional golfer pages is that there is vandalistic behavior on those pages soon after the player has gotten a win - that's one of the reasons I'd like to be a reviewer when there are changes waiting. Another reason is that I've not taken on any kind of tasks in Wikipedia as long as I've been on, and I thought this would be a nice thing to do. I'm not limited to golf, either - I think I can possibly be a reviewer for pages ranging in topics. No doubt that there are a plentiful supply of reviewers, but if you could use another, I may be right for it. Thank you. Johnsmith2116 (talk) 22:49, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

User:Arfæst Ealdwrítere

• Arfæst Ealdwrítere (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

I am a regular editor who fights vandalism with Twinkle and I have permission for STiki. I most often patrol Recent Changes, New Pages, and New Account feeds which is where much of the vandalism may be found although I know that there is much that I have not found, particularly those within the pending review section. I would like to be a reviewer because it would allow me to expand the horizons on which I combat vandalism. I already have rollback rights. I have read and understood WP:REVIEWER. Edit: I have changed my username to Arfæst Ealdwrítere since making this request. Arfæst Ealdwrítere 11:27, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

 Done -- Lord Roem ~ (talk) 23:50, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

User:Lwarrenwiki

• Lwarrenwiki (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

I have been actively editing since last summer. It's less than a year, but I hope that the articles that I've expanded or created, as well as my activity in disambiguation and some AfD/CfD discussions, provide a good track record by which to judge my potential as a reviewer. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 15:51, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

 Done -- Lord Roem ~ (talk) 23:48, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

User:Toolen

• Toolen (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

I've been a member for a few years now, and I am quite familiar with the policies concerning editing. I may not be the best editor, or the most active, but I am devoted to factual accuracy and eliminating vandalism on this site. Becoming a reviewer will help me combat vandalism and protect both my own contributions and those of other like-minded contributors. Thanks! Toolen (talk) 20:55, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

User:Presidentman

• Presidentman (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

Hello. I would like to become a reviewer in order to ensure that the encyclopedia stays free of incorrect and unsourced information, as well as to prevent vandalism. I have been editing for seven years, and have made over fifteen thousand edits. I will respond to any questions or comments you may have. Thank you. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 18:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

 Done Granted. — xaosflux ^Talk 14:07, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

User:Abhinav

• Abhinav (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

I would like to be able to review Wikipedia articles & pending changes using this right. I am already familiar with WP:BLP,WP:NPOV, WP:VAND and WP:NOTVAND as I've spent quite some time now as a rollbacker. Since then, I have gradually come to learn the difference between the edits that are deemed acceptable on WP and the ones that are not. I have also read the guidelines at WP:RVW.

The reviewer right would provide a convenient option for me to keep a check on edits to articles in the pending changes zone. Thank you. Abhinav—Ŧ—� 17:41, 18 June 2014 (UTC)